IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5899-d1688338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Societal Impact of the Catalan Cork Industry: Measuring Its Socioeconomic and Environmental Value

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Ayuso

    (Escola Superior de Comerç Internacional (ESCI-UPF), Pompeu Fabra University, 08003 Barcelona, Spain)

  • Albert Hereu

    (Catalan Cork Institute Foundation, 17200 Palafrugell, Spain)

  • Eduard Ventalló

    (Catalan Cork Institute Foundation, 17200 Palafrugell, Spain)

Abstract

Despite widespread recognition of the potential of cork oak forests and the cork industry to generate societal value, few comprehensive efforts have been made to quantify this value. This paper seeks to analyze and monetarily assess the overall value that the Catalan cork industry creates for society. To achieve this, it applies Integrated Social Value (ISV) analysis, a social accounting model that evaluates both the economic and social value generated by an organization for its stakeholders. Additionally, it incorporates the valuation of ecosystem services to provide a more holistic perspective. The magnitudes of the performed value estimations show that the environmental value of the analyzed Catalan cork companies is at least as high as the socioeconomic value. This study makes two key contributions. First, it extends the application of the ISV model to an entire industry—comprising interconnected companies operating within the same business sphere—while addressing specific challenges in the value calculation. Second, it integrates ISV analysis with the existing framework for valuing ecosystem services, thereby capturing the environmental value of the natural resources on which the industry relies.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Ayuso & Albert Hereu & Eduard Ventalló, 2025. "Societal Impact of the Catalan Cork Industry: Measuring Its Socioeconomic and Environmental Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5899-:d:1688338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5899/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5899/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Silvia Ayuso & Pablo Sánchez & José Luis Retolaza & Mònica Figueras-Maz, 2020. "Social value analysis: the case of Pompeu Fabra University," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(1), pages 233-252, January.
    2. Sierra-Pérez, Jorge & Boschmonart-Rives, Jesús & Gabarrell, Xavier, 2015. "Production and trade analysis in the Iberian cork sector: Economic characterization of a forest industry," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 55-66.
    3. Núria Arimany-Serrat & Elisenda Tarrats-Pons, 2021. "Integrated Social Value at Universities: A Guarantee for Public Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, May.
    4. Silvia Ayuso & Pablo Sánchez & José Luis Retolaza & Mònica Figueras-Maz, 2020. "Social value analysis: the case of Pompeu Fabra University," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(1), pages 233-252, January.
    5. Javier Mendoza Jiménez & Beatriz Guzmán Pérez & María Victoria Pérez Monteverde & Cándido Román Cervantes, 2020. "The Contribution of the Fishermen’s Guilds and the Agrarian Transformation Societies to the Sustainable Development Goals: The Case of the Canary Islands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-28, July.
    6. Jose Luis Retolaza & Leire San-Jose, 2021. "Understanding Social Accounting Based on Evidence," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, April.
    7. Luigi La Riccia & Vanessa Assumma & Marta Carla Bottero & Federico Dell’Anna & Angioletta Voghera, 2023. "A Contingent Valuation-Based Method to Valuate Ecosystem Services for a Proactive Planning and Management of Cork Oak Forests in Sardinia (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-28, May.
    8. Luigi Corvo & Lavinia Pastore & Arianna Manti & Daniel Iannaci, 2021. "Mapping Social Impact Assessment Models: A Literature Overview for a Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Hein, Lars & van Koppen, Kris & de Groot, Rudolf S. & van Ierland, Ekko C., 2006. "Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 209-228, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cornelis Leeuwen & Jos Frijns & Annemarie Wezel & Frans Ven, 2012. "City Blueprints: 24 Indicators to Assess the Sustainability of the Urban Water Cycle," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(8), pages 2177-2197, June.
    2. Brunet, Lucas & Tuomisaari, Johanna & Lavorel, Sandra & Crouzat, Emilie & Bierry, Adeline & Peltola, Taru & Arpin, Isabelle, 2018. "Actionable knowledge for land use planning: Making ecosystem services operational," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 27-34.
    3. Gerd Lupp & Bernhard Förster & Valerie Kantelberg & Tim Markmann & Johannes Naumann & Carolina Honert & Marc Koch & Stephan Pauleit, 2016. "Assessing the Recreation Value of Urban Woodland Using the Ecosystem Service Approach in Two Forests in the Munich Metropolitan Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Ping Shen & Lijuan Wu & Ziwen Huo & Jiaying Zhang, 2023. "A Study on the Spatial Pattern of the Ecological Product Value of China’s County-Level Regions Based on GEP Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Rodríguez-Ortega, T. & Olaizola, A.M. & Bernués, A., 2018. "A novel management-based system of payments for ecosystem services for targeted agri-environmental policy," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 34(PA), pages 74-84.
    6. Brendan Fisher & Stephen Polasky & Thomas Sterner, 2011. "Conservation and Human Welfare: Economic Analysis of Ecosystem Services," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 48(2), pages 151-159, February.
    7. Gema Lobillo Mora & Xavier Ginesta & Jordi de San Eugenio Vela, 2021. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Football Clubs: The Value of Environmental Sustainability as a Basis for the Rebranding of Real Betis Balompié in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Haobo Feng & Jian Hou & Jiahui Jiang & Linfang Shi, 2024. "Land Use Optimization from the Perspective of Multiple Stakeholder Groups: A Case Study in Yongsheng County, Yunnan Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, September.
    9. Bhatta, Arun & Bigsby, Hugh R. & Cullen, Ross, 2011. "Alternative to Comprehensive Ecosystem Services Markets: The Contribution of Forest-Related Programs in New Zealand," 2011 Conference, August 25-26, 2011, Nelson, New Zealand 115350, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    10. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Tobias D. Ketterer, 2012. "Do Local Amenities Affect The Appeal Of Regions In Europe For Migrants?," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 535-561, October.
    11. Lamprinakis, L. & Rodriguez, D. G. P. & Prestvik, A. S. & Veidal, A. & Klimek, B., 2017. "31 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18461/pfsd.2017.1705 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON FOOD SYSTEM DYNAMICS A Mixed Methods Approach Towards Mapping and Economic Valuation of the Divici-Pojejena Wetland Ecosystem," 2018 International European Forum (163rd EAAE Seminar), February 5-9, 2018, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 276889, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    12. Bo Yang & Ming-Han Li & Shujuan Li, 2013. "Design-with-Nature for Multifunctional Landscapes: Environmental Benefits and Social Barriers in Community Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-26, October.
    13. Stapleton, L.M. & Hanna, P. & Ravenscroft, N. & Church, A., 2014. "A flexible ecosystem services proto-typology based on public opinion," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 83-90.
    14. Gregg C. Brill & Pippin M. L. Anderson & Patrick O’Farrell, 2022. "Relational Values of Cultural Ecosystem Services in an Urban Conservation Area: The Case of Table Mountain National Park, South Africa," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-28, April.
    15. Vahid Amini Parsa & Esmail Salehi & Ahmad Reza Yavari & Peter M van Bodegom, 2019. "An improved method for assessing mismatches between supply and demand in urban regulating ecosystem services: A case study in Tabriz, Iran," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, August.
    16. Matzek, Virginia & Wilson, Kerrie A. & Kragt, Marit, 2019. "Mainstreaming of ecosystem services as a rationale for ecological restoration in Australia," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 79-86.
    17. McVittie, Alistair & Norton, Lisa & Martin-Ortega, Julia & Siameti, Ioanna & Glenk, Klaus & Aalders, Inge, 2015. "Operationalizing an ecosystem services-based approach using Bayesian Belief Networks: An application to riparian buffer strips," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 15-27.
    18. Ruiqi Zhang & Chunguang Hu & Yucheng Sun, 2024. "Decoding the Characteristics of Ecosystem Services and the Scale Effect in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Urban Agglomeration: Insights for Planning and Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-26, September.
    19. Bieling, Claudia & Plieninger, Tobias & Pirker, Heidemarie & Vogl, Christian R., 2014. "Linkages between landscapes and human well-being: An empirical exploration with short interviews," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 19-30.
    20. Min Fan & Li Chen & Qing Wang, 2019. "Assessing the high impacts of land use change: spatial characteristics of land uses and ecological compensation based on payment for ecosystem services model in a mountainous area, China," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 1431-1460, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5899-:d:1688338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.