IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i4p1694-d324600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Dynamic Model for the Financial Sustainability of the Restoration Sponsorship

Author

Listed:
  • Luigi Dolores

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano SA, Italy)

  • Maria Macchiaroli

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano SA, Italy)

  • Gianluigi De Mare

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano SA, Italy)

Abstract

The paper addresses the theme of sponsorship as the main form of public–private partnership through which to finance restoration/recovery interventions for the historical–architectural heritage. The goal is the maximization of sponsorship profitability for companies. Specifically, an existing dynamic model through which it was possible to estimate the optimal annual amount to be invested in sponsorship to maximize the current value of expected profits has been analyzed, reworked and for the first time applied to an Italian company. It was therefore assumed that the company is intent on supporting a multi-year program of sponsorship investment. It is also assumed that the corporation is a single-product company, operating in monopolistic competition and characterized by a Cobb–Douglas production function with decreasing returns to scale. The work is in continuity with a previous publication focused on the application and validation of a static model. The final goal is to provide tools for applied analysis of the financial sustainability of the sponsorship that forms incentive for companies to implement its use, facilitating the recovery of the historical–architectural heritage. Public bodies can thus benefit from the greater contribution of resources from private financiers for a zero-cost and sustainable valorization of cultural heritage.

Suggested Citation

  • Luigi Dolores & Maria Macchiaroli & Gianluigi De Mare, 2020. "A Dynamic Model for the Financial Sustainability of the Restoration Sponsorship," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-27, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1694-:d:324600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1694/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/4/1694/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luigi Dolores & Maria Macchiaroli & Gianluigi De Mare, 2017. "Sponsorship for the Sustainability of Historical-Architectural Heritage: Application of a Model’s Original Test Finalized to Maximize the Profitability of Private Investors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Nigel D. Caldwell & Jens K. Roehrich & Gerard George, 2017. "Social Value Creation and Relational Coordination in Public-Private Collaborations," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(6), pages 906-928, September.
    3. S. A. Ozga, 1960. "Imperfect Markets Through Lack of Knowledge," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 74(1), pages 29-52.
    4. Luigi L. Pasinetti, 2000. "Critique of the neoclassical theory of growth and distribution," Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 53(215), pages 383-431.
    5. Stephen Bond & Costas Meghir, 1994. "Dynamic Investment Models and the Firm's Financial Policy," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 61(2), pages 197-222.
    6. Enrico Saltari & Giuseppe Travaglini, 2001. "Barriere di prezzo, vincoli di liquidità e investimento," Rivista di Politica Economica, SIPI Spa, vol. 91(3), pages 65-90, March.
    7. Jinglu Jiang & Xin Xia & Jinqiang Yang, 2019. "Investment-based optimal capital structure," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(9), pages 972-981, February.
    8. Tsurumi, Hiroki, 1973. "A Comparison of Alternative Optimal Models of Advertising Expenditures: Stock Adjustment vs. Control Theoretic Approaches," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 55(2), pages 156-168, May.
    9. Marta Bottero & Chiara D’Alpaos & Alessandra Oppio, 2019. "Ranking of Adaptive Reuse Strategies for Abandoned Industrial Heritage in Vulnerable Contexts: A Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Laura Cavallo & Giuseppe Coco, 2002. "La remunerazione del capitale investito nelle imprese soggette a regolazione," ECONOMIA PUBBLICA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2002(4).
    11. Lyon, Randolph M., 1990. "Federal discount rate policy, the shadow price of capital, and challenges for reforms," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 29-50, March.
    12. Nicholas Argyres & Joseph T. Mahoney & Jackson Nickerson, 2019. "Strategic responses to shocks: Comparative adjustment costs, transaction costs, and opportunity costs," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 357-376, March.
    13. Abel, Andrew B., 1980. "Empirical investment equations : An integrative framework," Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 39-91, January.
    14. T. S. Breusch & A. R. Pagan, 1980. "The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 47(1), pages 239-253.
    15. Ilze Kivleniece & Bertrand Quélin, 2012. "Creating and Capturing Value in Public-Private Ties: A Private Actor's Perspective," Post-Print hal-00677772, HAL.
    16. Huang, Jian & Leng, Mingming & Liang, Liping, 2012. "Recent developments in dynamic advertising research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 591-609.
    17. Roehrich, Jens K. & Lewis, Michael A. & George, Gerard, 2014. "Are public–private partnerships a healthy option? A systematic literature review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 110-119.
    18. Francesco Calabrò & Lucia Della Spina, 2019. "The Public–Private Partnership for the Enhancement of Unused Public Buildings: An Experimental Model of Economic Feasibility Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-25, October.
    19. M. L. Vidale & H. B. Wolfe, 1957. "An Operations-Research Study of Sales Response to Advertising," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 370-381, June.
    20. Luigi L. Pasinetti, 2000. "Critique of the neoclassical theory of growth and distribution," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 53(215), pages 383-431.
    21. Mark LeClair & Kelly Gordon, 2000. "Corporate Support for Artistic and Cultural Activities: What Determines the Distribution of Corporate Giving?," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 24(3), pages 225-241, August.
    22. Alberto Bucci & Massimiliano Castellani & Paolo Figini, 2003. "L’investimento in sponsorizzazione delle imprese: un’analisi economica in termini statici e dinamici," Rivista di Politica Economica, SIPI Spa, vol. 93(3), pages 183-224, May-June.
    23. Douglas, Paul H, 1976. "The Cobb-Douglas Production Function Once Again: Its History, Its Testing, and Some New Empirical Values," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 84(5), pages 903-915, October.
    24. Yehuda Kotowitz & Frank Mathewson, 1979. "Advertising, Consumer Information, and Product Quality," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 10(2), pages 566-588, Autumn.
    25. John O'Hagan & Denice Harvey, 2000. "Why Do Companies Sponsor Arts Events? Some Evidence and a Proposed Classification," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 24(3), pages 205-224, August.
    26. Sulagna Mukherjee & Jitendra Mahakud, 2010. "Dynamic adjustment towards target capital structure: evidence from Indian companies," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(2), pages 250-266, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luigi Dolores & Maria Macchiaroli & Gianluigi De Mare, 2021. "Sponsorship’s Financial Sustainability for Cultural Conservation and Enhancement Strategies: An Innovative Model for Sponsees and Sponsors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    2. Luigi Dolores & Maria Macchiaroli & Gianluigi De Mare, 2022. "Financial Impacts of the Energy Transition in Housing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Agnese Amato & Maria Andreoli & Massimo Rovai, 2021. "Adaptive Reuse of a Historic Building by Introducing New Functions: A Scenario Evaluation Based on Participatory MCA Applied to a Former Carthusian Monastery in Tuscany, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bilal Anwar & Zhongdong Xiao & Sharmin Akter & Ramiz-Ur Rehman, 2017. "Sustainable Urbanization and Development Goals Strategy through Public–Private Partnerships in a South-Asian Metropolis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-26, October.
    2. Gordon Dugle & Stephen Debar Kpinpuo & Benjamin Baisie Ghartey, 2021. "From paper to practice: an exploratory study of policy making and implementation in alternative forms of healthcare public‐private partnership in Ghana," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 866-884, May.
    3. El Ouardighi, Fouad & Feichtinger, Gustav & Grass, Dieter & Hartl, Richard & Kort, Peter M., 2016. "Autonomous and advertising-dependent ‘word of mouth’ under costly dynamic pricing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 860-872.
    4. Gabriel Castelblanco & Jose Guevara & Harrison Mesa & Diego Flores, 2020. "Risk Allocation in Unsolicited and Solicited Road Public-Private Partnerships: Sustainability and Management Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, June.
    5. Jesus Felipe & Franklin M. Fisher, 2003. "Aggregation in Production Functions: What Applied Economists should Know," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2‐3), pages 208-262, May.
    6. Luigi Dolores & Maria Macchiaroli & Gianluigi De Mare, 2021. "Sponsorship’s Financial Sustainability for Cultural Conservation and Enhancement Strategies: An Innovative Model for Sponsees and Sponsors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-28, August.
    7. Salhab, Rabih & Le Ny, Jérôme & Malhamé, Roland P. & Zaccour, Georges, 2022. "Dynamic marketing policies with rating-sensitive consumers: A mean-field games approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(3), pages 1079-1093.
    8. Reddy, Puduru V. & Wrzaczek, Stefan & Zaccour, Georges, 2016. "Quality effects in different advertising models - An impulse control approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 255(3), pages 984-995.
    9. Pascual Berrone & Joan Enric Ricart & Ana Isabel Duch & Valeria Bernardo & Jordi Salvador & Juan Piedra Peña & Miquel Rodríguez Planas, 2019. "EASIER: An Evaluation Model for Public–Private Partnerships Contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, April.
    10. Cheng Chen & Dan Li & Caixia Man, 2018. "Toward Sustainable Development? A Bibliometric Analysis of PPP-Related Policies in China between 1980 and 2017," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, December.
    11. Chinyere Ndukwe & Adeline Nnenna Idike & Ikechukwu Ogeze Ukeje & Cornelius Ofobuisi Okorie & Johnpaul Chukwujindu Onele & Nneka Ernestina Richard-Nnabu & Clementina Kanu & Benedette Nneka Okezie & Rap, 2023. "Public Private Partnerships Dynamics in Nigeria Power Sector: Service Failure Outcomes and Consumer Dissonance Behaviour," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 623-646, June.
    12. Vicente Alcaraz Carrillo De Albornoz & Antonio Lara Galera & Juan Molina Millán, 2018. "Is It Correct to Use the Internal Rate of Return to Evaluate the Sustainability of Investment Decisions in Public Private Partnership Projects?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, November.
    13. Srivardhini K. Jha & E. Richard Gold & Laurette Dubé, 2021. "Modular Interorganizational Network Governance: A Conceptual Framework for Addressing Complex Social Problems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    14. Lizal, L., 1999. "Does a Soft Macroeconomic Environment Induce Restructuring on the Microeconomic Level during the Transition Period? Evidence from Investment Behavior of Czech Enterprises," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp147, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    15. Jacques Mairesse & Bronwyn H. Hall & Benoît Mulkay, 1999. "Firm-Level Investment in France and the United States: An Exploration of What We Have Learned in Twenty Years," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 55-56, pages 27-67.
    16. Zacharias Bragoudakis & Evangelia Kasimati & Christos Pierros & Nikolaos Rodousakis & George Soklis, 2022. "Measuring Productivities for the 38 OECD Member Countries: An Input-Output Modelling Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-21, July.
    17. DemIr, FIrat, 2009. "Capital Market Imperfections and Financialization of Real Sectors in Emerging Markets: Private Investment and Cash Flow Relationship Revisited," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 953-964, May.
    18. Avi J. Cohen, 2003. "Retrospectives: Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 17(1), pages 199-214, Winter.
    19. Stefano Lucarelli, 2023. "From the effective demand as a principle to the ownership of the capital as social responsibility. Rereading Luigi Pasinetti," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 76(307), pages 353-371.
    20. Watson, Rosina & Wilson, Hugh N. & Macdonald, Emma K., 2020. "Business-nonprofit engagement in sustainability-oriented innovation: What works for whom and why?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 87-98.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:4:p:1694-:d:324600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.