IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i20p8534-d428656.html

Educated Millennials and Credence Attributes of Food Products with Genetically Modified Organisms: Knowledge, Trust and Social Media

Author

Listed:
  • Carlo Russo

    (Department of Economics and Law, University of Cassino and Lazio Meridionale, 03043 Cassino, Italy)

  • Mariarosaria Simeone

    (Department of Law, Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods (DEMM) University of Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy)

  • Maria Angela Perito

    (Faculty of Bioscience and Technology for Food, Agriculture and Environment, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy
    INRAE, UR ALISS, Université Paris-Saclay, 94205 Ivry-sur-Seine, France)

Abstract

In this paper, we investigated educated millennials’ evaluation of credence attributes in food products containing genetically modified organisms (GMO products). Our goal is to assess whether beliefs about GMO products are determined by scientific knowledge alone or if they are affected by other factors such as trust in information providers and use of social media. The focus on millennials is motivated by the increasing relevance of this social group in the public debate and by their extensive use of social media. We surveyed a sample of 215 Italian college students, confronting them with questions about safety, environmental impact and ethical issues in GMO product consumption. Using an ordered probit regression model, we found that educated millennials build their beliefs using a mix of scientific knowledge and trust in information providers. The role of the two drivers depended on the issue considered. Scientific knowledge drove beliefs in health claims, while trust in information providers was a driving factor in almost all claims. After controlling for trust effects, we did not find evidence of impact of confidence in the reliability of traditional and social media on beliefs. This result contradicts previous literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlo Russo & Mariarosaria Simeone & Maria Angela Perito, 2020. "Educated Millennials and Credence Attributes of Food Products with Genetically Modified Organisms: Knowledge, Trust and Social Media," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8534-:d:428656
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8534/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8534/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaneko, Naoya & Chern, Wen S., 2004. "Willingness To Pay For Non-Genetically Modified Food: Evidence Of Hypothetical Bias From An Auction Experiment In Japan," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20305, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Jayson L. Lusk & Jutta Roosen & Andrea Bieberstein, 2014. "Consumer Acceptance of New Food Technologies: Causes and Roots of Controversies," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 6(1), pages 381-405, October.
    3. Hanna Bäck & Marc Debus & Jale Tosun, 2015. "Partisanship, Ministers, and Biotechnology Policy," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 32(5), pages 556-575, September.
    4. Jackson, Lee Ann & Anderson, Kym, 2003. "WHY ARE US AND EU POLICIES TOWARD GMOs SO DIFFERENT?," 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia 57898, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    5. Kelvin J. Lancaster, 1966. "A New Approach to Consumer Theory," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74(2), pages 132-132.
    6. Lang, John T., 2013. "Elements of public trust in the American food system: Experts, organizations, and genetically modified food," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 145-154.
    7. Costa-Font, Montserrat & Gil, José M. & Traill, W. Bruce, 2008. "Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 99-111, April.
    8. Marco Lerro & Maria Raimondo & Marcello Stanco & Concetta Nazzaro & Giuseppe Marotta, 2019. "Cause Related Marketing among Millennial Consumers: The Role of Trust and Loyalty in the Food Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    9. Lusk, Jayson L. & Roosen, Jutta & Shogren, Jason (ed.), 2011. "The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Food Consumption and Policy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199569441.
    10. Silvia Coderoni & Maria Angela Perito, 2020. "Sustainable consumption in the circular economy. An analysis of consumers’ purchase intentions for waste-to-value food," Post-Print hal-03385002, HAL.
    11. Nadia Palmieri & Mariarosaria Simeone & Carlo Russo & Maria Angela Perito, 2020. "Profiling young consumers’ perceptions of GMO products: A case study on Italian undergraduate students," Post-Print hal-03384849, HAL.
    12. Călin Gurău & Ashok Ranchhod, 2016. "The futures of genetically-modified foods: Global threat or panacea?," Post-Print hal-02012309, HAL.
    13. Nadia Palmieri & Maria Angela Perito & Claudio Lupi, 2020. "Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: some hints from Italy," Post-Print hal-03385175, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Grzegorz Szymański, 2021. "Marketing Activities of Local Food Producers in E-Commerce," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Maria Angela Perito & Emilio Chiodo & Annalisa Serio & Antonello Paparella & Andrea Fantini, 2020. "Factors Influencing Consumers’ Attitude Towards Biopreservatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-12, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Irz, Xavier & Mazzocchi, Mario & Réquillart, Vincent & Soler, Louis-Georges, 2015. "Research in Food Economics: past trends and new challenges," Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, Editions NecPlus, vol. 96(01), pages 187-237, March.
    2. Lynn J. Frewer, 2017. "Consumer acceptance and rejection of emerging agrifood technologies and their applications," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 44(4), pages 683-704.
    3. Gina Waterfield & Scott Kaplan & David Zilberman, 2020. "Willingness to Pay versus Willingness to Vote: Consumer and Voter Avoidance of Genetically Modified Foods," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(2), pages 505-524, March.
    4. Joseph Seong & Simone Valle De Souza & April Athnos & H. Christopher Peterson, 2026. "Who is willing to pay a premium for leafy greens produced by indoor agriculture? A comparative choice experiment with US consumers," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(1), pages 3-28, January.
    5. Staudigel, Matthias & Trubnikov, Aleksej, 2022. "High price premiums as barriers to organic meat demand? A hedonic analysis considering species, cut and retail outlet," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 66(02), January.
    6. Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas & Lusk, Jayson & Magnier, Alexandre, 2018. "The price of non-genetically modified (non-GM) food," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 38-50.
    7. Dieter Pennerstorfer & Nora Schindler & Christoph Weiss & Biliana Yontcheva, 2020. "Income Inequality and Product Variety: Empirical Evidence," Economics working papers 2020-17, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    8. Tavárez, Héctor & Álamo, Carmen & Cortés,Mildred, . "Differentiated coffees and their potential markets in Puerto Rico: An economic valuation approach," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 20(02).
    9. Mirzobobo Yormirzoev & Ramona Teuber & Daniil Baranov, 2018. "Is Tajikistan a Potential Market for Genetically Modified Potatoes?," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 216-226.
    10. Marta Verza & Alberto Ceccacci & Giuseppe Frigo & Luca Mulazzani & Parthena Chatzinikolaou, 2024. "Legumes on the Rise: The Impact of Sustainability Attributes on Market Prices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-15, March.
    11. Fiore, M. & Gaviglio, A. & Demartini, E. & La Sala, P., 2018. "Sugarcoating Food Technologies and consumers’ acceptance of long-life fish," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 275971, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Joseph Seong & Simone Valle de Souza & H. Christopher Peterson, 2023. "Seeds of Industry Sustainability: Consumer Attitudes towards Indoor Agriculture Benefits versus Its Advanced Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    13. Staudigel, Matthias & Trubnikov, Aleksej, "undated". "How do organic price premiums vary across different supply and demand side factors? A hedonic analysis of the German market for fresh meat," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 273989, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Anna Kristina Edenbrandt & Sinne Smed & Léon Jansen, 2018. "A hedonic analysis of nutrition labels across product types and countries," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 45(1), pages 101-120.
    15. Alessandro Bonanno & Francesco Bimbo & Marco Costanigro & Alfons Oude Lansink & Rosaria Viscecchia, 2019. "Credence attributes and the quest for a higher price – a hedonic stochastic frontier approach," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 46(2), pages 163-192.
    16. Steven S. Vickner, 2017. "Friend or PHO? On the Marginal Valuation of Reducing the Content of Trans Fat in Processed Foods," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 1-2.
    17. Alexandre Magnier & Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes & Jayson Lusk, 2022. "Changes in Consumer Preferences toward Non‐GM Foods within an Information‐Rich Environment: The Case of the Washington State Ballot Initiative," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(1), pages 489-510, March.
    18. Lin Lin & David L. Ortega & Jiayu Sun, 2025. "The effectiveness of misinformation corrective strategies and implications for consumers' food preferences and policy attitudes," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(1), pages 217-240, March.
    19. Carole Ropars-Collet & Philippe Le Goffe & Qods Lefnatsa, 2021. "Does catch-and-release increase the recreational value of rivers? The case of salmon fishing," Post-Print hal-03342732, HAL.
    20. Norris, A. & Cranfield, J., 2018. "Consumer Preferences for Country of Origin Labelling on Dairy Products," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 275948, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8534-:d:428656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.