IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i17p6827-d402723.html

Business Process Management and Digital Innovations: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Tahir Ahmad

    (Department of Business Informatics and Operations Management, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

  • Amy Van Looy

    (Department of Business Informatics and Operations Management, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium)

Abstract

Emerging technologies have capabilities to reshape business process management (BPM) from its traditional version to a more explorative variant. However, to exploit the full benefits of new IT, it is essential to reveal BPM’s research potential and to detect recent trends in practice. Therefore, this work presents a systematic literature review (SLR) with 231 recent academic articles (from 2014 until May 2019) that integrate BPM with digital innovations (DI). We position those articles against seven future BPM-DI trends that were inductively derived from an expert panel. By complementing the expected trends in practice with a state-of-the-art literature review, we are able to derive covered and uncovered themes in order to help bridge a rigor-relevance gap. The major technological impacts within the BPM field seem to focus on value creation, customer engagement and managing human-centric and knowledge-intensive business processes. Finally, our findings are categorized into specific calls for research and for action to let scholars and organizations better prepare for future digital needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Tahir Ahmad & Amy Van Looy, 2020. "Business Process Management and Digital Innovations: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-30, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6827-:d:402723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6827/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/17/6827/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Rosemann & Jan Brocke, 2015. "The Six Core Elements of Business Process Management," International Handbooks on Information Systems, in: Jan vom Brocke & Michael Rosemann (ed.), Handbook on Business Process Management 1, edition 2, pages 105-122, Springer.
    2. Michael Lubatkin & Zeki Simsek & Yan Ling & John F. Veiga, 2006. "Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms : The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration," Post-Print hal-02311781, HAL.
    3. Venkatraman, N. & Henderson, John C. & Oldach, Scott, 1993. "Continuous strategic alignment: Exploiting information technology capabilities for competitive success," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 139-149, June.
    4. Maria Guadalupe & Hongyi Li & Julie Wulf, 2014. "Who Lives in the C-Suite? Organizational Structure and the Division of Labor in Top Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 824-844, April.
    5. Hyundo Choi, 2018. "Technology-push and demand-pull factors in emerging sectors: evidence from the electric vehicle market," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(7), pages 655-674, August.
    6. Theresa Schmiedel & Jan vom Brocke, 2015. "Business Process Management: Potentials and Challenges of Driving Innovation," Management for Professionals, in: Jan vom Brocke & Theresa Schmiedel (ed.), BPM - Driving Innovation in a Digital World, edition 127, pages 3-15, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ivan Belev, 2024. "Combining digital business automation technologies," Innovative Information Technologies for Economy Digitalization (IITED), University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 1, pages 305-312, October.
    2. Aldona Jarašūnienė & Kristina Čižiūnienė & Artūras Petraška, 2022. "Sustainability Promotion by Digitalisation to Ensure the Quality of Less-Than-Truck Load Shipping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Reihaneh Hajishirzi & Carlos J. Costa & Manuela Aparicio, 2022. "Boosting Sustainability through Digital Transformation’s Domains and Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Haneen Allataifeh & Sedigheh Moghavvemi, 2021. "The Individual Dimension of Digital Innovation: The Altered Roles of Innovation Agents and Market Actors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Andi Abdul Dzuljalali Wal Ikram & Muslim Salam & M. Ramli AT & Sawedi Muhammad, 2025. "Employing Structural Equation Modeling to Examine the Determinants of Work Motivation and Performance Management in BUMDES: In Search of Key Driver Factors in Promoting Sustainable Rural Development Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-44, July.
    6. Qi Song & Xiaohong Chen & Hao Gu, 2023. "How Technological, Organizational, and Environmental Factors Drive Enterprise Digital Innovation: Analysis Based on the Dynamic FsQCA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Zhang, Yujie & Ba, Zhichao & Mao, Jin & Li, Gang, 2025. "Quantifying the impact of digital technology on enterprise processes using LLM-based causal claim networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3).
    8. Sławomir Ostrowski, 2021. "Commitment Ladder in the Relationship between Service Providers and Customers as Added Value in Sustainable Services Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    9. Siyue Zhang & Jiangtao Hong & Kwok Hung Lau & Yu Tian, 2026. "How digital transformation enhances supply chain resilience and organisational performance: a digital affordance perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 359(3), pages 2795-2828, April.
    10. Amini, Ali & Rey-Mermet, Samuel & Crettenand, Steve & Münch-Alligné, Cécile, 2025. "A hybrid methodology for assessing hydropower plants under flexible operations: Leveraging experimental data and machine learning techniques," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 383(C).
    11. Itzhak Aviv & Irit Hadar & Meira Levy, 2021. "Knowledge Management Infrastructure Framework for Enhancing Knowledge-Intensive Business Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-32, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tobias Bender, 2024. "Towards a process selection method for embedded analytics," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 501-525, September.
    2. Pravin Nath & Neeraj Bharadwaj, 2020. "Chief marketing officer presence and firm performance: assessing conditions under which the presence of other C-level functional executives matters," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 670-694, July.
    3. Jan Brocke & Marie-Sophie Baier & Theresa Schmiedel & Katharina Stelzl & Maximilian Röglinger & Charlotte Wehking, 2021. "Context-Aware Business Process Management," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 63(5), pages 533-550, October.
    4. Katharina Stelzl & Maximilian Röglinger & Katrin Wyrtki, 2020. "Building an ambidextrous organization: a maturity model for organizational ambidexterity," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(3), pages 1203-1230, November.
    5. Mahendrawathi ER & Natasha Ratna Puspita Mulyono & Ivan Althirafi Rentio & Ika Nurkasanah, 2024. "How do digital startups manage their activities? Insights and opportunities for business process management," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 557-598, September.
    6. Tomasz Helbin & Amy Van Looy, 2021. "Is Business Process Management (BPM) Ready for Ambidexterity? Conceptualization, Implementation Guidelines and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    7. Jurczuk Arkadiusz, 2021. "Barriers to implementation of business process governance mechanisms," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 13(4), pages 22-38, December.
    8. Kim, Sang-Joon & Bae, John & Oh, Hannah, 2019. "Financing strategically: The moderation effect of marketing activities on the bifurcated relationship between debt level and firm valuation of small and medium enterprises," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 663-681.
    9. Mammassis, Constantinos S. & Kostopoulos, Konstantinos C., 2019. "CEO goal orientations, environmental dynamism and organizational ambidexterity: An investigation in SMEs," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 577-588.
    10. Ali, Abdul & Mancha, Ruben & Pachamanova, Dessislava, 2018. "Correcting analytics maturity myopia," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 211-219.
    11. Francesco Ciampi & Alessandro Giannozzi & Giacomo Marzi & Edward I. Altman, 2021. "Rethinking SME default prediction: a systematic literature review and future perspectives," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(3), pages 2141-2188, March.
    12. Matsuno, Ken & Kohlbacher, Florian, 2020. "Proactive marketing response to population aging: The roles of capabilities and commitment of firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 93-104.
    13. Chang, Kuo-Hsiung & Gotcher, Donald F., 2020. "How and when does co-production facilitate eco-innovation in international buyer-supplier relationships? The role of environmental innovation ambidexterity and institutional pressures," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(5).
    14. Jiazhen Song & Xiaobao Peng & Sumran Ali & Emmanuel Mensah Horsey & Jiashun Huang, 2024. "The relationship between CEO narcissism and hybrid organising," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(5), pages 767-791, November.
    15. Gayoung Kim & Woo Jin Lee, 2021. "The Venture Firm’s Ambidexterity: Do Transformational Leaders Boost Organizational Learning for Venture Growth?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, July.
    16. Sabyasachi Sinha, 2015. "The Exploration–Exploitation Dilemma: A Review in the Context of Managing Growth of New Ventures," Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, , vol. 40(3), pages 313-323, September.
    17. Markus Menz & Sven Kunisch & Julian Birkinshaw & David J. Collis & Nicolai J. Foss & Robert E. Hoskisson & John E. Prescott, 2021. "Corporate Strategy and the Theory of the Firm in the Digital Age," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(7), pages 1695-1720, November.
    18. Mahmoona Khalil & Kausar Fiaz Khawaja & Muddassar Sarfraz, 2022. "The adoption of blockchain technology in the financial sector during the era of fourth industrial revolution: a moderated mediated model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2435-2452, August.
    19. Partanen, Jukka & Kohtamäki, Marko & Patel, Pankaj C. & Parida, Vinit, 2020. "Supply chain ambidexterity and manufacturing SME performance: The moderating roles of network capability and strategic information flow," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    20. Myriam Schaschek & Fabian Gwinner & Nicolas Neis & Christoph Tomitza & Christian Zeiß & Axel Winkelmann, 2024. "Managing next generation BP-x initiatives," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 457-500, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:6827-:d:402723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.