IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i3p788-d203094.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Tour-Based Mode Choice Model for Commuters in Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Faza Fawzan Bastarianto

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jln. Grafika No.2 Bulaksumur, 55281 Yogyakarta, Indonesia
    Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds, 34-40 University Road, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Muhammad Zudhy Irawan

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jln. Grafika No.2 Bulaksumur, 55281 Yogyakarta, Indonesia)

  • Charisma Choudhury

    (Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds, 34-40 University Road, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • David Palma

    (Institute for Transport Studies University of Leeds, 34-40 University Road, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

  • Imam Muthohar

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Universitas Gadjah Mada, Jln. Grafika No.2 Bulaksumur, 55281 Yogyakarta, Indonesia)

Abstract

With the advent of activity-based modelling, transport planners’ focus has shifted from isolated trips to tours. Tours are series of interconnected trips that start and finish at home. There are different types of tours; we focus on two: hwh (start at home; go to work; and then go back home) and hw+wh (where + represents a non-work activity). Tour types introduce a new dimension to the traditional problem of travel mode choice, as the mode choice might be influenced by the type of tour. This study attempts to measure and compare the relationship between tour type and mode choice using three different modelling approaches: Multinomial Logit (MNL); Nested Logit (NL) and Cross-Nested Logit (CNL). We compare each approach using secondary data from a larger survey: 24-h daily activity patterns of 420 commuters between Bekasi and Jakarta; one of the busiest commuting routes in Indonesia. Among other results, we found that gender and income significantly influence commuter’s choice of mode and that reducing travel time and cost can increase the ridership of public transport. Furthermore, the NL and CNL models showed significant improvement over the simpler MNL when grouping the alternatives based on tour types. This points to a significant influence of the tour type on the mode choice. Policy recommendations to increase traveler’s wellbeing are also formulated.

Suggested Citation

  • Faza Fawzan Bastarianto & Muhammad Zudhy Irawan & Charisma Choudhury & David Palma & Imam Muthohar, 2019. "A Tour-Based Mode Choice Model for Commuters in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:788-:d:203094
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/788/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/788/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lars Lundqvist & Lars-Göran Mattsson (ed.), 2002. "National Transport Models," Advances in Spatial Science, Springer, number 978-3-662-04853-5, February.
    2. Chinh Ho & Corinne Mulley, 2013. "Tour-based mode choice of joint household travel patterns on weekend and weekday," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 789-811, July.
    3. Soltani, Ali, 2017. "Social and urban form determinants of vehicle ownership; evidence from a developing country," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 90-100.
    4. Stephane Hess & Mark Fowler & Thomas Adler & Aniss Bahreinian, 2012. "A joint model for vehicle type and fuel type choice: evidence from a cross-nested logit study," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 593-625, May.
    5. Eric Miller & Matthew Roorda & Juan Carrasco, 2005. "A tour-based model of travel mode choice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 32(4), pages 399-422, July.
    6. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555, January.
    7. Dissanayake, Dilum & Morikawa, Takayuki, 2010. "Investigating household vehicle ownership, mode choice and trip sharing decisions using a combined revealed preference/stated preference Nested Logit model: case study in Bangkok Metropolitan Region," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 402-410.
    8. Wen, Chieh-Hua & Koppelman, Frank S., 2001. "The generalized nested logit model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 627-641, August.
    9. Dimas B. E. Dharmowijoyo & Yusak O. Susilo & Anders Karlström, 2016. "Day-to-day variability in travellers’ activity-travel patterns in the Jakarta metropolitan area," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 601-621, July.
    10. David Levinson & Zhirong Jerry Zhao, 2012. "Introduction to the special issue on value capture for transportation finance," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 5(1), pages 1-3.
    11. Djoen San Santoso & Koji Tsunokawa, 2005. "Spatial Transferability and Updating Analysis of Mode Choice Models in Developing Countries," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(5), pages 341-358, July.
    12. Dharmowijoyo, Dimas B.E. & Susilo, Yusak O. & Karlström, Anders, 2017. "Analysing the complexity of day-to-day individual activity-travel patterns using a multidimensional sequence alignment model: A case study in the Bandung Metropolitan Area, Indonesia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 1-12.
    13. Olszewski, Piotr & Xie, Litian, 2005. "Modelling the effects of road pricing on traffic in Singapore," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 39(7-9), pages 755-772.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Zudhy Irawan & Prawira Fajarindra Belgiawan & Tri Basuki Joewono & Nurvita I. M. Simanjuntak, 2020. "Do motorcycle-based ride-hailing apps threaten bus ridership? A hybrid choice modeling approach with latent variables," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 207-231, March.
    2. Zhao, Chuyun & Tang, Jinjun & Kong, Xiangxin & Yu, Tianjian & Li, Zhitao, 2024. "Emission analysis of multi-mode public transportation based on joint choice model considering built environment factors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    3. Irawan, Muhammad Zudhy & Simanjuntak, Nurvita I.M. & Bastarianto, Faza Fawzan & Dwitasari, Reslyana & Herawati,, 2020. "Predicting the impact of Trans Java Toll Roads on demand for intercity air travel in Indonesia," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Hamad, Khaled & Obaid, Lubna, 2022. "Tour-based travel demand forecasting model for a university campus," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 118-137.
    5. Fariha Riska Yumita & Muhammad Zudhy Irawan & Siti Malkhamah & Muhammad Iqbal Habibi Kamal, 2021. "School Commuting: Barriers, Abilities and Strategies toward Sustainable Public Transport Systems in Yogyakarta, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bates, John J., 2024. "Pivoting from a known base when predicting choices using logit models," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    2. Zhang, Le & Duan, Peng & Jiang, Hai, 2024. "Modeling joint row- and column-wise correlation in air passenger seat selection: A cross-nested logit approach," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    3. Zhang, Le & Azadeh, Shadi Sharif & Jiang, Hai, 2025. "Exact and heuristic algorithms for cardinality-constrained assortment optimization problem under the cross-nested logit model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 324(1), pages 183-199.
    4. Paleti, Rajesh, 2018. "Generalized multinomial probit Model: Accommodating constrained random parameters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 248-262.
    5. Chetan Doddamani & M. Manoj, 2023. "Analysis of the influences of built environment measures on household car and motorcycle ownership decisions in Hubli-Dharwad cities," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 205-243, February.
    6. Dam, Tien Thanh & Ta, Thuy Anh & Mai, Tien, 2022. "Submodularity and local search approaches for maximum capture problems under generalized extreme value models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 953-965.
    7. Brücker, Herbert & Bertoli, Simone & Fernández-Huertas Moraga, Jesús, 2013. "The European Crisis and Migration to Germany: Expectations and the Diversion of Migration Flows," VfS Annual Conference 2013 (Duesseldorf): Competition Policy and Regulation in a Global Economic Order 79693, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    8. Koo, Tay T.R. & Hossein Rashidi, Taha & Park, Jin-Woo & Wu, Cheng-Lung & Tseng, Wen-Chun, 2017. "The effect of enhanced international air access on the demand for peripheral tourism destinations: Evidence from air itinerary choice behaviour of Korean visitors to Australia," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 116-129.
    9. Peter Davis & Pasquale Schiraldi, 2014. "The flexible coefficient multinomial logit (FC-MNL) model of demand for differentiated products," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 45(1), pages 32-63, March.
    10. Emerson Melo, 2021. "Learning in Random Utility Models Via Online Decision Problems," Papers 2112.10993, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    11. Picasso, Emilio & Postorino, Maria Nadia & Bonoli-Escobar, Mariano & Stewart-Harris, Maria, 2020. "Car-sharing vs bike-sharing: A choice experiment to understand young people behaviour," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 121-128.
    12. Newman, Jeffrey P. & Lurkin, Virginie & Garrow, Laurie A., 2018. "Computational methods for estimating multinomial, nested, and cross-nested logit models that account for semi-aggregate data," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 28-40.
    13. Guan, Xiaodong & Wang, Donggen, 2019. "Influences of the built environment on travel: A household-based perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 710-724.
    14. Laura Grigolon, 2021. "Blurred boundaries: A flexible approach for segmentation applied to the car market," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(4), pages 1273-1305, November.
    15. Anthony Pennington-Cross, 2010. "The Duration of Foreclosures in the Subprime Mortgage Market: A Competing Risks Model with Mixing," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 109-129, February.
    16. José-Benito Pérez-López & Margarita Novales & Francisco-Alberto Varela-García & Alfonso Orro, 2020. "Residential Location Econometric Choice Modeling with Irregular Zoning: Common Border Spatial Correlation Metric," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 785-802, September.
    17. Koppelman, Frank S. & Sethi, Vaneet, 2005. "Incorporating variance and covariance heterogeneity in the Generalized Nested Logit model: an application to modeling long distance travel choice behavior," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 825-853, November.
    18. Karlson Pfannschmidt & Pritha Gupta & Bjorn Haddenhorst & Eyke Hullermeier, 2019. "Learning Context-Dependent Choice Functions," Papers 1901.10860, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2021.
    19. Mogens Fosgerau & Julien Monardo & André de Palma, 2024. "The Inverse Product Differentiation Logit Model," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 16(4), pages 329-370, November.
    20. David Müller & Vladimir Shikhman, 2022. "Network manipulation algorithm based on inexact alternating minimization," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 627-664, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:788-:d:203094. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.