IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v7y2018i4p62-d140768.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Disparities in Faculty Rank: Factors that Affect Advancement of Women Scientists at Academic Medical Centers

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina M. López

    (College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA)

  • Cara Margherio

    (Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA)

  • Latecia M. Abraham-Hilaire

    (Academic Affairs Faculty, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA)

  • Carol Feghali-Bostwick

    (Center for ARROWS and College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA)

Abstract

While a significant portion of women within academic science are employed within medical schools, women faculty in these academic medical centers are disproportionately represented in lower faculty ranks. The medical school setting is a critical case for both understanding and advancing women in basic sciences. This study highlights the findings from focus groups conducted with women faculty across Assistant, Associate, and Full Professor ranks ( n = 35) in which they discussed barriers and facilitators for advancement of women basic scientists at an academic medical center. Qualitative analysis demonstrated several emergent themes that affect women’s advancement, including gendered expectation norms (e.g., good citizenship, volunteerism), work-life balance, mentorship/sponsorship, adoption of a team science approach, tenure process milestones, soft money research infrastructure, institution specific policies (or lack thereof), and operating within an MD-biased culture. These findings are compared with the extant literature of women scientists in STEM institutions. Factors that emerged from these focus groups highlight the need for evidence-based interventions in the often overlooked STEM arena of academic medical centers.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina M. López & Cara Margherio & Latecia M. Abraham-Hilaire & Carol Feghali-Bostwick, 2018. "Gender Disparities in Faculty Rank: Factors that Affect Advancement of Women Scientists at Academic Medical Centers," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:4:p:62-:d:140768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/4/62/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/4/62/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Latika Vasil, 1996. "Social Process Skills and Career Achievement among Male and Female Academics," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 67(1), pages 103-114, January.
    2. Heilman, Madeline E. & Eagly, Alice H., 2008. "Gender Stereotypes Are Alive, Well, and Busy Producing Workplace Discrimination," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(4), pages 393-398, December.
    3. Ronald G. Ehrenberg & George H. Jakubson & Mirinda L. Martin & Joyce B. Main & Thomas Eisenberg, 2009. "Do Trustees and Administrators Matter? Diversifying the Faculty Across Gender Lines," NBER Working Papers 15606, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Górska Anna, 2017. "Perception of Women in Top Managerial Positions in Poland," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 25(1), pages 16-32, March.
    2. Enrica N. Ruggs & Jennifer Ames Stuart & Linyun W. Yang, 2018. "The effect of traditionally marginalized groups in advertising on consumer response," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 319-335, September.
    3. Costa, James M., 1999. "The Impact Of Seed-Grant Funding On Extramural Research Awards," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21620, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Kristof Witte & Nicky Rogge, 2010. "To publish or not to publish? On the aggregation and drivers of research performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(3), pages 657-680, December.
    5. Adina D. Sterling & Roberto M. Fernandez, 2018. "Once in the Door: Gender, Tryouts, and the Initial Salaries of Managers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(11), pages 5444-5460, November.
    6. Brad Greenwood & Idris Adjerid & Corey M. Angst & Nathan L. Meikle, 2022. "How Unbecoming of You: Online Experiments Uncovering Gender Biases in Perceptions of Ridesharing Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 499-518, January.
    7. Julia Muschallik & Kerstin Pull, 2016. "Mentoring in higher education: does it enhance mentees’ research productivity?," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 210-223, April.
    8. Rita Goyal & Nada Kakabadse & Andrew Kakabadse & Danielle Talbot, 2023. "Female board directors' resilience against gender discrimination," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 197-222, January.
    9. Nishtha Langer & Ram D. Gopal & Ravi Bapna, 2020. "Onward and Upward? An Empirical Investigation of Gender and Promotions in Information Technology Services," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 383-398, June.
    10. Onochie Fan-Osuala, 2023. "Women’s online opinions are still not as influential as those of their male peers in buying decisions," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Daniela Wilks & Félix Neto, 2013. "Workplace Well-being, Gender and Age: Examining the ‘Double Jeopardy’ Effect," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 114(3), pages 875-890, December.
    12. Anna Gorska, 2016. "Gender Differences in Leadership (Roznice w zarzadzaniu miedzy kobietami a mezczyznami)," Research Reports, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 1(20), pages 136-144.
    13. Alka Gupta & Safal Batra & Vishal K. Gupta, 2022. "Gender, culture, and implicit theories about entrepreneurs: a cross-national investigation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 1073-1089, February.
    14. Braun, Susanne & Peus, Claudia & Frey, Dieter, 2018. "Connectionism in action: Exploring the links between leader prototypes, leader gender, and perceptions of authentic leadership," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 129-144.
    15. Dilshani Sarathchandra & Kristin Haltinner & Nicole Lichtenberg & Hailee Tracy, 2018. "“It’s Broader than Just My Work Here”: Gender Variations in Accounts of Success among Engineers in U.S. Academia," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Enav, Friedmann & Daphna, Brueller, 2018. "Is stereotypical gender targeting effective for increasing service choice?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 35-44.
    17. Anna Rakowska (Ed.) & Katarina Babnik (Ed.), 2015. "Human Resources Management Challenges: Learning \& Development," ToKnowPress Monographs, ToKnowPress, number 978-83-65020-02-4.
    18. Martin, Ashley E. & Phillips, Katherine W., 2017. "What “blindness” to gender differences helps women see and do: Implications for confidence, agency, and action in male-dominated environments," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 28-44.
    19. Sandra E. Cha & Laura Morgan Roberts, 2019. "Leveraging Minority Identities at Work: An Individual-Level Framework of the Identity Mobilization Process," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 735-760, July.
    20. Enkhzul Galsanjigmed & Tomoki Sekiguchi, 2023. "Challenges Women Experience in Leadership Careers: An Integrative Review," Merits, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-24, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:4:p:62-:d:140768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.