IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jresou/v8y2019i1p56-d215578.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Sustainability of Pasta Production Chains: An Integrated Approach for Comparing Local and Global Chains

Author

Listed:
  • Lucia Recchia

    (Department of Innovation and Information Engineering, Università degli Studi Guglielmo Marconi, via Plinio 44, 00193 Rome, Italy)

  • Alessio Cappelli

    (Department of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Systems (GESAAF), University of Florence, Piazzale delle Cascine 16, 50144 Firenze, Italy)

  • Enrico Cini

    (Department of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Systems (GESAAF), University of Florence, Piazzale delle Cascine 16, 50144 Firenze, Italy)

  • Francesco Garbati Pegna

    (Department of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Systems (GESAAF), University of Florence, Piazzale delle Cascine 16, 50144 Firenze, Italy)

  • Paolo Boncinelli

    (Department of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Systems (GESAAF), University of Florence, Piazzale delle Cascine 16, 50144 Firenze, Italy)

Abstract

Major pasta industries have started to evaluate the environmental footprint of their productions exploiting both Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and, in some cases, Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) methodologies. In this research, two different pasta production chains were considered: a “high-quality pasta” chain (referred here as “local or regional scenario”), which follows traditional procedures in a Tuscan farm that uses only ancient wheat varieties; and a “conventional pasta” one (referred here as “global or industrial scenario”), in which pasta is produced using national and international grains, following industrial processes. An integrated methodology based on both an Environmental Impacts ANalysis (EIAN) approach and the LCA has been developed, analyzing five environmental compartments (i.e., soil, water, air, resources, climate change) and a total number of ten expected environmental pressures. As a result, the high-quality pasta chain shows a better performance in terms of risk reduction of soil degradation and agrobiodiversity loss, as well as the consumption of non-renewable resources; this is mainly due to the use of lower quantity of chemicals, a lower mechanization level in the agricultural phase, and the use of ancient grains. However, the conventional pasta chain prevails in terms of a more efficient exploitation of land and water resources, due to higher yields and the use of more efficient sprayers, and also in reducing noise emitted by the overall production equipment.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucia Recchia & Alessio Cappelli & Enrico Cini & Francesco Garbati Pegna & Paolo Boncinelli, 2019. "Environmental Sustainability of Pasta Production Chains: An Integrated Approach for Comparing Local and Global Chains," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:56-:d:215578
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/8/1/56/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/8/1/56/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Babula, Ronald A. & Rich, Karl M., 2001. "A Time-Series Analysis Of The U.S. Durum Wheat And Pasta Markets," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 32(2), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Hager, Tiffany J. & Morawicki, Ruben, 2013. "Energy consumption during cooking in the residential sector of developed nations: A review," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 54-63.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eleonora Sofia Rossi & José A. Zabala & Francesco Caracciolo & Emanuele Blasi, 2023. "The Value of Crop Diversification: Understanding the Factors Influencing Consumers’ WTP for Pasta from Sustainable Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Elliot, Thomas & Levasseur, Annie, 2022. "System dynamics life cycle-based carbon model for consumption changes in urban metabolism," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 473(C).
    3. Marisa Faggini & Silvia Cosimato & Anna Parziale, 2023. "The way towards food sustainability: some insights for pasta supply chain," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 40(2), pages 679-702, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sofie Hagejärd & Anita Ollár & Paula Femenías & Ulrike Rahe, 2020. "Designing for Circularity—Addressing Product Design, Consumption Practices and Resource Flows in Domestic Kitchens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Javier Felipe-Andreu & Antonio Valero & Alicia Valero, 2022. "Territorial Inequalities, Ecological and Material Footprints of the Energy Transition: Case Study of the Cantabrian-Mediterranean Bioregion," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Malla, Sunil & Timilsina, Govinda R, 2014. "Household cooking fuel choice and adoption of improved cookstoves in developing countries : a review," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6903, The World Bank.
    4. Khandelwal, Meena & Hill, Matthew E. & Greenough, Paul & Anthony, Jerry & Quill, Misha & Linderman, Marc & Udaykumar, H.S., 2017. "Why Have Improved Cook-Stove Initiatives in India Failed?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 13-27.
    5. Besagni, Giorgio & Borgarello, Marco & Premoli Vilà, Lidia & Najafi, Behzad & Rinaldi, Fabio, 2020. "MOIRAE – bottom-up MOdel to compute the energy consumption of the Italian REsidential sector: Model design, validation and evaluation of electrification pathways," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    6. Natanael Bolson & Maxim Yutkin & Tadeusz Patzek, 2023. "Primary Power Analysis of a Global Electrification Scenario," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Tobias Engelmann & Daniel Fischer & Marianne Lörchner & Jaya Bowry & Holger Rohn, 2019. "“Doing” Sustainability Assessment in Different Consumption and Production Contexts—Lessons from Case Study Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.
    8. Leanne S. Giordono & June Flora & Chad Zanocco & Hilary Boudet, 2022. "Food Practice Lifestyles: Identification and Implications for Energy Sustainability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-19, May.
    9. Tian, Hailin & Wang, Xiaonan & Lim, Ee Yang & Lee, Jonathan T.E. & Ee, Alvin W.L. & Zhang, Jingxin & Tong, Yen Wah, 2021. "Life cycle assessment of food waste to energy and resources: Centralized and decentralized anaerobic digestion with different downstream biogas utilization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    10. Kashyap, S. Rahul & Pramanik, Santanu & Ravikrishna, R.V., 2023. "A review of solar, electric and hybrid cookstoves," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    11. Selvaraj Balachandran & Jose Swaminathan, 2022. "Advances in Indoor Cooking Using Solar Energy with Phase Change Material Storage Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-32, November.
    12. Xie, Xuan & Lin, Boqiang, 2019. "Understanding the energy intensity change in China's food industry: A comprehensive decomposition method," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 53-68.
    13. Kumaresan, G. & Santosh, R. & Raju, G. & Velraj, R., 2018. "Experimental and numerical investigation of solar flat plate cooking unit for domestic applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 436-447.
    14. Babula, Ronald A. & Newman, Douglas & Rogowsky, Robert A., 2006. "A Dynamic Model of U.S. Sugar-Related Markets: A Cointegrated Vector Autoregression Approach," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 37(2), pages 1-25, July.
    15. Martínez-Gómez, J. & Ibarra, D. & Villacis, S. & Cuji, P. & Cruz, P.R., 2016. "Analysis of LPG, electric and induction cookers during cooking typical Ecuadorian dishes into the national efficient cooking program," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 88-102.
    16. Indora, Sunil & Kandpal, Tara C., 2018. "Institutional cooking with solar energy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 131-154.
    17. Michael Martin & Miguel Brandão, 2017. "Evaluating the Environmental Consequences of Swedish Food Consumption and Dietary Choices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Banerjee, Manjushree & Prasad, Rakesh & Rehman, Ibrahim H & Gill, Bigsna, 2016. "Induction stoves as an option for clean cooking in rural India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 159-167.
    19. Malakhatka, Elena & Lundqvist, Per & Shafqat, Omar & De Bellefon, Angélique, 2022. "Identification of everyday food-related activities with potential for direct and indirect energy savings: KTH Live–in–Lab explorative case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    20. Liyew, Kassa W. & Habtu, Nigus G. & Louvet, Yoann & Guta, Dawit D. & Jordan, Ulrike, 2021. "Technical design, costs, and greenhouse gas emissions of solar Injera baking stoves," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jresou:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:56-:d:215578. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.