IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v13y2025i10p1545-d1651564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differentiated Advertising, Heterogeneous Consumers and Suitable Design of Platform Merchant

Author

Listed:
  • Xuefeng Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, North China University of Technology, No. 5, Jinyuanzhuang Road, Beijing 100144, China)

  • Ji Luo

    (China School of Banking and Finance, University of International Business and Economics, No. 10 Huixin East Street, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Xiao Liu

    (School of Economics and Management, North China University of Technology, No. 5, Jinyuanzhuang Road, Beijing 100144, China)

Abstract

The limited endowment of initial traffic creates fierce competition among merchants for securing scarce resources in e-commerce platforms. Optimal pricing mechanisms are imperative to maximize transaction volumes and attract sustained traffic support from platforms. This study investigates merchant pricing mechanisms under two advertising strategies—broadband advertising and targeted advertising—by constructing differentiated pricing models that account for consumer preference heterogeneity. The findings reveal that, in most cases where merchants prioritize profit maximization, targeted advertising-driven pricing mechanisms outperform broadband advertising strategies. However, when merchants prioritize early-stage sales volume, broadband advertising proves to be more advantageous. Furthermore, the study shows that merchant pricing strategies evolve over their lifecycle, transitioning from offering lower prices to high-type consumers toward progressively higher prices, thus validating the underlying mechanism of “big data price discrimination” (the phenomenon of “killing loyal customers”). Additionally, this research emphasizes the importance of accurately understanding consumer preferences, as the sensitivity differential between price and advertising responses plays a crucial moderating role. When the sensitivity gap becomes excessively large, the price differential in differentiated pricing mechanisms should be proportionally reduced to maintain effectiveness. In conclusion, by integrating consumer utility, merchant profit, and platform incentives, pricing mechanisms based on targeted advertising exhibit superior capabilities in screening consumer information. When combined with advertising effectiveness and consumer preference heterogeneity, these mechanisms represent a relatively optimal strategy. However, this conclusion holds only when the proportion of high-type consumers in the market is moderate, not excessively low. This study contributes to the literature by providing a comprehensive framework for merchants to select appropriate pricing strategies under varying advertising environments and consumer structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuefeng Zhang & Ji Luo & Xiao Liu, 2025. "Differentiated Advertising, Heterogeneous Consumers and Suitable Design of Platform Merchant," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-32, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:10:p:1545-:d:1651564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/10/1545/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/13/10/1545/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bharat Anand & Ron Shachar, 2009. "Targeted advertising as a signal," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 7(3), pages 237-266, September.
    2. Roger B. Myerson, 2008. "Perspectives on Mechanism Design in Economic Theory," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(3), pages 586-603, June.
    3. Maxime C. Cohen & Adam N. Elmachtoub & Xiao Lei, 2022. "Price Discrimination with Fairness Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(12), pages 8536-8552, December.
    4. Andrew Rhodes & Jidong Zhou, 2024. "Personalized Pricing and Competition," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(7), pages 2141-2170, July.
    5. Maskin, Eric S., 2008. "Mechanism design: how to implement social objectives," Revista de Economía Política de Buenos Aires, Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas., issue 3-4, pages 9-19, December.
    6. Hariharan, Vijay Ganesh & Talukdar, Debabrata & Kwon, Changhyun, 2015. "Optimal targeting of advertisement for new products with multiple consumer segments," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 263-271.
    7. Zhijun Chen & Chongwoo Choe & Noriaki Matsushima, 2020. "Competitive Personalized Pricing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(9), pages 4003-4023, September.
    8. Eric S. Maskin, 2008. "Mechanism Design: How to Implement Social Goals," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(3), pages 567-576, June.
    9. Wilfred Amaldoss & Jinzhao Du & Woochoel Shin, 2024. "Pricing Strategy of Competing Media Platforms," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 488-505, May.
    10. Nada Ben Elhadj-Ben Brahim & Rim Lahmandi-Ayed & Didier Laussel, 2014. "Is Targeted Advertising always Beneficial?," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Kaddour Hadri & William Mikhail (ed.), Econometric Methods and Their Applications in Finance, Macro and Related Fields, chapter 20, pages 551-585, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    11. Justin P. Johnson & Thomas Jungbauer & Marcel Preuss, 2024. "Online Advertising, Data Sharing, and Consumer Control," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(11), pages 7984-8002, November.
    12. Vidyanand Choudhary & Anindya Ghose & Tridas Mukhopadhyay & Uday Rajan, 2005. "Personalized Pricing and Quality Differentiation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(7), pages 1120-1130, July.
    13. Rosa-Branca Esteves & Joana Resende, 2016. "Competitive Targeted Advertising with Price Discrimination," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 576-587, July.
    14. Anna D’Annunzio & Antonio Russo, 2024. "Intermediaries in the Online Advertising Market," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 33-53, January.
    15. Christopher A. Summers & Robert W. Smith & Rebecca Walker Reczek, 2016. "An Audience of One: Behaviorally Targeted Ads as Implied Social Labels," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 43(1), pages 156-178.
    16. Deni Mazreka & Mark D. Verhagen & Ajay Kumar & Daniel Muzio, 2025. "Does Price Personalization Ethically Outperform Unitary Pricing? : A Thought Experiment and a Simulation Study," Post-Print hal-04850420, HAL.
    17. Zhaoqing Yu & Yuyan Wang & Liang Shen & Xue Ji, 2024. "Decision Making by Trade-In Programs in the E-Commerce Supply Chain, Considering Cash Rebate Strategies and Platform Services," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-26, November.
    18. Dasu, Sriram & Tong, Chunyang, 2010. "Dynamic pricing when consumers are strategic: Analysis of posted and contingent pricing schemes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 204(3), pages 662-671, August.
    19. Xubing Zhang, 2009. "Retailers' Multichannel and Price Advertising Strategies," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(6), pages 1080-1094, 11-12.
    20. Diego Aparicio & Zachary Metzman & Roberto Rigobon, 2024. "The pricing strategies of online grocery retailers," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-21, March.
    21. Garbarino, Ellen & Maxwell, Sarah, 2010. "Consumer response to norm-breaking pricing events in e-commerce," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(9-10), pages 1066-1072, September.
    22. Jean-Pierre Dubé & Sanjog Misra, 2023. "Personalized Pricing and Consumer Welfare," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 131(1), pages 131-189.
    23. Yuxin Chen & Chakravarthi Narasimhan & Z. John Zhang, 2001. "Individual Marketing with Imperfect Targetability," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 23-41, November.
    24. Esther Gal-Or & Mordechai Gal-Or & Jerrold H. May & William E. Spangler, 2006. "Targeted Advertising Strategies on Television," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 713-725, May.
    25. Lihao Lu & Qinglong Gou & Wansheng Tang & Jianxiong Zhang, 2016. "Joint pricing and advertising strategy with reference price effect," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(17), pages 5250-5270, September.
    26. Hufnagel, Gerrit & Schwaiger, Manfred & Weritz, Louisa, 2022. "Seeking the perfect price: Consumer responses to personalized price discrimination in e-commerce," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 346-365.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qiuyu Lu & Noriaki Matsushima, 2024. "Personalized Pricing When Consumers Can Purchase Multiple Items," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(4), pages 1507-1524, December.
    2. Zhao Jiang & Dan Wu, 2022. "Targeting Precision in Imperfect Targeted Advertising: Implications for the Regulation of Market Structure and Efficiency," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    3. Wang, Wei & Li, Gang & Fung, Richard Y.K. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2019. "Mobile Advertising and Traffic Conversion: The Effects of Front Traffic and Spatial Competition," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 84-101.
    4. Zhao Jiang & Wu Dan & Liu Jie, 2020. "Distinct role of targeting precision of Internet-based targeted advertising in duopolistic e-business firms’ heterogeneous consumers market," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 453-474, June.
    5. Zhang, Jianqiang & He, Xiuli, 2019. "Targeted advertising by asymmetric firms," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 136-150.
    6. Noriaki Matsushima & Mark J. Tremblay, 2024. "Network compatibility and incumbent pricing regimes," ISER Discussion Paper 1265, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka.
    7. Chongwoo Choe & Jiajia Cong & Chengsi Wang, 2024. "Softening Competition Through Unilateral Sharing of Customer Data," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(1), pages 526-543, January.
    8. Xiuxian Li & Pengwen Hou & Shuhua Zhang, 2023. "The optimal advertising strategy with differentiated targeted effect consumers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 1295-1336, May.
    9. Simon Anderson & Alicia Baik & Nathan Larson, 2023. "Price Discrimination in the Information Age: Prices, Poaching, and Privacy with Personalized Targeted Discounts," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 90(5), pages 2085-2115.
    10. Noriaki Matsushima & Tomomichi Mizuno & Cong Pan, 2023. "Personalized pricing with heterogeneous mismatch costs," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 90(2), pages 369-388, October.
    11. Esteves, Rosa-Branca & Resende, Joana, 2019. "Personalized pricing and advertising: Who are the winners?," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 239-282.
    12. Qiuyu Lu & Noriaki Matsushima & Shiva Shekhar, 2024. "Welfare Implications of Personalized Pricing in Competitive Platform Markets: The Role of Network Effects," CESifo Working Paper Series 10994, CESifo.
    13. Li, Shichang & Wu, Jie & Li, Jingyan & Zhou, Fangkezi, 2025. "The adoption of personalized pricing in a supply chain with a common retailer," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    14. Li, Sanxi & Sun, Hailin & Yu, Jun, 2023. "Competitive targeted online advertising," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    15. Rosa Brana Esteves & Joana Resende, 2017. "Personalized Pricing with Targeted Advertising: Who are the Winners?," NIPE Working Papers 02/2017, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
    16. Karle, Heiko & Peitz, Martin, 2017. "De-targeting: Advertising an assortment of products to loss-averse consumers," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 103-124.
    17. Dror Hermel & Benny Mantin & Yossi Aviv, 2022. "Can coupons counteract strategic consumer behavior?," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(3), pages 262-273, June.
    18. Esteves, Rosa-Branca, 2022. "Can personalized pricing be a winning strategy in oligopolistic markets with heterogeneous demand customers? Yes, it can," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    19. Chen Chen & Yongrui Duan & Guiping Li, 2022. "Adoption of personalized pricing in a supply chain," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(7), pages 2715-2728, October.
    20. Andreas Leibbrandt, 2016. "Behavioral Constraints on Pricing: Experimental Evidence on Price Discrimination and Customer Antagonism," CESifo Working Paper Series 6214, CESifo.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:13:y:2025:i:10:p:1545-:d:1651564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.