On the Bias of the Unbiased Expectation Theory

The unbiased expectation theory stipulates that long-term interest rates are determined by the market’s expectations of future short-term interest rates. According to this hypothesis, if investors have unbiased expectations about future interest rate movements, the forward interest rates should be good predictors of future spot interest rates. This hypothesis of the term structure of interest rates has long been a subject of debate due to empirical and theoretical challenges. Despite extensive research, a satisfactory explanation for the observed systematic difference between future spot interest rates and forward interest rates has not yet been identified. In this study, we approach this issue from an arbitrage theory perspective, leveraging on the connection between the expectation hypothesis and changes in probability measures. We propose that the observed bias can be explained by two adjustments: a risk premia adjustment, previously considered in the literature, and a stochastic adjustment that has been overlooked until now resulting from two measure changes. We further demonstrate that for specific instances of the Vasicek and Cox, as well as the Ingersoll and Ross, stochastic interest rate models, quantifying these adjustments reveals that the stochastic adjustment plays a significant role in explaining the bias, and ignoring it may lead to an overestimation of the required risk premia/aversion adjustment. Our findings extend beyond the realm of financial economic theory to have tangible implications for interest rate modelling. The capacity to quantify and distinguish between risk and stochastic adjustments empowers modellers to make more informed decisions, leading to a more accurate understanding of interest rate dynamics over time.