IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i6p1203-d1671652.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating Remote Sensing, Landscape Metrics, and Random Forest Algorithm to Analyze Crop Patterns, Factors, Diversity, and Fragmentation in a Kharif Agricultural Landscape

Author

Listed:
  • Surajit Banerjee

    (Department of Geography and Resources Management, Mizoram University, Aizawl 796004, India)

  • Tuhina Nandi

    (Agricultural Insurance Company of India Limited, New Delhi 110023, India
    Department of Geo-Informatics, Pandit Raghunath Murmu Smriti, Mahavidyalaya, Bankura University, Bankura 722155, India)

  • Vishwambhar Prasad Sati

    (Department of Geography and Resources Management, Mizoram University, Aizawl 796004, India
    Impact Policy Research Institute, New Delhi 110017, India)

  • Wiem Mezlini

    (Department of Geology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis 2092, Tunisia)

  • Wafa Saleh Alkhuraiji

    (Department of Geography and Environmental Sustainability, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. BOX 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia)

  • Djamil Al-Halbouni

    (Institute for Earth System Science and Remote Sensing, University of Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany)

  • Mohamed Zhran

    (Public Works Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt)

Abstract

Despite growing importance, agricultural landscapes face threats, like fragmentation, shrinkage, and degradation, due to climate change. Although remote sensing and GIS are widely used in monitoring croplands, integrating machine learning, remote sensing, GIS, and landscape metrics for the holistic management of this landscape remains underexplored. Thus, this study monitored crop patterns using random forest (94% accuracy), the role of geographical factors (such as elevation, aspect, slope, maximum and minimum temperature, rainfall, cation exchange capacity, NPK, soil pH, soil organic carbon, soil type, soil water content, proximity to drainage, proximity to market, proximity to road, population density, and profit per hectare production), diversity, combinations, and fragmentation using landscape metrics and a fragmentation index. Findings revealed that slope, rainfall, temperature, and profit per hectare production emerged as significant drivers in shaping crop patterns. However, anthropogenic drivers became deciding factors during spatial overlaps between crop suitability zones. Rice belts were the least fragmented and highly productive with a risk of monoculture. Croplands with a combination of soybean, black grams, and maize were highly fragmented, despite having high diversity with comparatively less production per field. These diverse fields were providing higher profits and low risks of crop failure due to the crop combinations. Equally, intercropping balanced the nutrient uptakes, making the practice sustainable. Thus, it can be suggested that productivity and diversity should be prioritized equally to achieve sustainable land use. The development of the PCA-weighted fragmentation index offers an efficient tool to measure fragmentation across similar agricultural regions, and the integrated approach provides a scalable framework for holistic management, sustainable land use planning, and precision agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Surajit Banerjee & Tuhina Nandi & Vishwambhar Prasad Sati & Wiem Mezlini & Wafa Saleh Alkhuraiji & Djamil Al-Halbouni & Mohamed Zhran, 2025. "Integrating Remote Sensing, Landscape Metrics, and Random Forest Algorithm to Analyze Crop Patterns, Factors, Diversity, and Fragmentation in a Kharif Agricultural Landscape," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1203-:d:1671652
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1203/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/6/1203/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fei Ju & Rui Yang & Chun Yang, 2025. "Analysis of Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Driving Factors of China’s Nationally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-36, January.
    2. Anubhab Pattanayak & Madhumitha Srinivasan & K. S. Kavi Kumar, 2023. "Crop Diversity and Resilience to Droughts: Evidence from Indian Agriculture," Review of Development and Change, , vol. 28(2), pages 166-188, December.
    3. Deininger, Klaus & Savastano, Sara & Carletto, Calogero, 2012. "Land Fragmentation, Cropland Abandonment, and Land Market Operation in Albania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(10), pages 2108-2122.
    4. Ravi Kumar Pappaka & Anusha Boya Nakkala & Pradeep Kumar Badapalli & Sakram Gugulothu & Ramesh Anguluri & Fahdah Falah Ben Hasher & Mohamed Zhran, 2025. "Machine Learning-Driven Groundwater Potential Zoning Using Geospatial Analytics and Random Forest in the Pandameru River Basin, South India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-27, April.
    5. R. Lal, 2009. "Soil degradation as a reason for inadequate human nutrition," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 1(1), pages 45-57, February.
    6. Chemeris, Anna & Liu, Yong & Ker, Alan P., 2022. "Insurance subsidies, climate change, and innovation: Implications for crop yield resiliency," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    7. Prabuddh Kumar Mishra & Aman Rai & Kamal Abdelrahman & Suresh Chand Rai & Anuj Tiwari, 2022. "Land Degradation, Overland Flow, Soil Erosion, and Nutrient Loss in the Eastern Himalayas, India," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Pradosh Nath & Bhagirath Behera, 2011. "A critical review of impact of and adaptation to climate change in developed and developing economies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 141-162, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dong, Kangyin & Zhao, Congyu & Nepal, Rabindra & Zander, Kerstin K., 2025. "Are natural disasters stumbling blocks to carbon inequality mitigation? A global perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    2. Zhihai Yang & Amin W. Mugera & Ning Yin & Yumeng Wang, 2018. "Soil conservation practices and production efficiency of smallholder farms in Central China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1517-1533, August.
    3. Tian, Guangjin & Duan, Jinlong & Yang, Lan, 2021. "Spatio-temporal pattern and driving mechanisms of cropland circulation in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    4. Massamba Diop & Ngonidzashe Chirinda & Adnane Beniaich & Mohamed El Gharous & Khalil El Mejahed, 2022. "Soil and Water Conservation in Africa: State of Play and Potential Role in Tackling Soil Degradation and Building Soil Health in Agricultural Lands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-29, October.
    5. Behera, Bhagirath & Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Sethi, Narayan, 2020. "Analysis of household access to drinking water, sanitation, and waste disposal services in urban areas of Nepal," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    6. Ning Geng & Mengyao Wang & Zengjin Liu, 2022. "Farmland Transfer, Scale Management and Economies of Scale Assessment: Evidence from the Main Grain-Producing Shandong Province in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Bhadury, Soumya & Pratap, Bhanu & Gajbhiye, Dhirendra, 2025. "Transition to a greener economy: Climate change risks and resilience in a state-space framework," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    8. Yinrong Chen & Yanqing Qin & Qingying Zhu, 2023. "Study on the Impact of Social Capital on Agricultural Land Transfer Decision: Based on 1017 Questionnaires in Hubei Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, April.
    9. Daniel H. Pope & Johan O. Karlsson & Phillip Baker & David McCoy, 2021. "Examining the Environmental Impacts of the Dairy and Baby Food Industries: Are First-Food Systems a Crucial Missing Part of the Healthy and Sustainable Food Systems Agenda Now Underway?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Lulin Shen & Fang Wang, 2024. "Can Market-Oriented Allocation of Land Factors Promote the Adoption of Cropland Quality Protection Behaviors by Farmers: Evidence from Rural China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, May.
    11. Pengjing Zhang & Tao Xiong, 2025. "Can Agricultural Subsidies Reduce Cropland Abandonment in Rural China?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    12. Céline Nauges & Sarah Ann Wheeler & Kelly S. Fielding, 2021. "The relationship between country and individual household wealth and climate change concern: the mediating role of control," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16481-16503, November.
    13. Stefano Bigiotti & Mariangela Ludovica Santarsiero & Carlo Costantino & Alvaro Marucci, 2025. "Photovoltaic Technology and Rural Landscapes: A Systematic Literature Review on Challenges and Sustainable Integration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-54, April.
    14. Somasundaram Jayaraman & Yash P. Dang & Anandkumar Naorem & Kathryn L. Page & Ram C. Dalal, 2021. "Conservation Agriculture as a System to Enhance Ecosystem Services," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-14, July.
    15. Daniel Ayalew Ali & Klaus Deininger & Loraine Ronchi, 2019. "Costs and Benefits of Land Fragmentation: Evidence from Rwanda," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 33(3), pages 750-771.
    16. Zheng, Linyi, 2024. "Big hands holding small hands: The role of new agricultural operating entities in farmland abandonment," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    17. Halberg, Niels & Panneerselvam, P. & Treyer, Sebastien, 2015. "Eco-functional Intensification and Food Security: Synergy or Compromise?," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 4(3 Special).
    18. Del Prete, Davide & Ghins, Léopold & Magrini, Emiliano & Pauw, Karl, 2019. "Land consolidation, specialization and household diets: Evidence from Rwanda," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 139-149.
    19. Paulino Martinez-Fernandez & Fernando deLlano-Paz & Anxo Calvo-Silvosa & Isabel Soares, 2018. "Pollutant versus non-pollutant generation technologies: a CML-analogous analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 199-212, December.
    20. Rao, Xudong, 2014. "Land Fragmentation with Double Bonuses -- The Case of Tanzanian Agriculture," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 169436, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:6:p:1203-:d:1671652. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.