IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v11y2022i5p727-d813813.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Verifying the Synthesized Effects of Intensive Urban Land Use on Quality of Life, Ecology, and Urban-Land-Use Scale in China

Author

Listed:
  • Bingqing Li

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, No. 388, Lumo Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Zhanqi Wang

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, No. 388, Lumo Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Ji Chai

    (School of Public Administration, China University of Geosciences, No. 388, Lumo Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

Intensive urban land use has been proposed as a method to promote sustainable development in the context of rapid urban sprawl. However, a consensus has not been reached on whether this approach is beneficial for ecology and compatible with suitable living conditions. Exploring this issue in China will help promote high-quality development. Extant research has mainly explored the effects of intensive urban land use on quality of life, ecology, and urban-land-use scale separately, while a synthesized analysis in this regard is lacking. In the light of this, we establish an analysis framework by which to verify the effects of intensive urban land use on the three aspects, using data from China spanning 2005–2019, subjected to structural equation modeling. The results show that intensive urban land use has varying degrees of positive effects on quality of life, ecology, and urban-land-use scale. It had no strong effect on the three items initially, while quality of life was significantly optimized by 2010, and ecology was markedly improved from 2015. However, there was a trend toward shrinking living space and sprawling urban areas. The corresponding suggestions are formulated for policy makers to improve intensive urban-land-use policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Bingqing Li & Zhanqi Wang & Ji Chai, 2022. "Verifying the Synthesized Effects of Intensive Urban Land Use on Quality of Life, Ecology, and Urban-Land-Use Scale in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:5:p:727-:d:813813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/5/727/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/11/5/727/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Santos-Martín, F. & Zorrilla-Miras, P. & Palomo, I. & Montes, C. & Benayas, J. & Maes, J., 2019. "Protecting nature is necessary but not sufficient for conserving ecosystem services: A comprehensive assessment along a gradient of land-use intensity in Spain," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 43-51.
    2. Ruimin Yin & Zhanqi Wang & Ji Chai & Yunxiao Gao & Feng Xu, 2022. "The Evolution and Response of Space Utilization Efficiency and Carbon Emissions: A Comparative Analysis of Spaces and Regions," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Jun Yang & Gui Jin & Xianjin Huang & Kun Chen & Hao Meng, 2018. "How to Measure Urban Land Use Intensity? A Perspective of Multi-Objective Decision in Wuhan Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Golob, Thomas F., 2003. "Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Gaigné, Carl & Riou, Stéphane & Thisse, Jacques-François, 2012. "Are compact cities environmentally friendly?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 123-136.
    6. Song, Xin-Yuan & Chen, Fei & Lu, Zhao-Hua, 2013. "A Bayesian semiparametric dynamic two-level structural equation model for analyzing non-normal longitudinal data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 87-108.
    7. Song, Yang & Yeung, Godfrey & Zhu, Daolin & Xu, Yang & Zhang, Lixin, 2022. "Efficiency of urban land use in China’s resource-based cities, 2000–2018," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    8. Gaigné, Carl & Riou, Stéphane & Thisse, Jacques-François, 2012. "Are compact cities environmentally friendly?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 123-136.
    9. Carl Gaigné & Stéphane Riou & Jacques-François Thisse, 2012. "Are Compact Cities Environmentally (and Socially) Desirable ?," Cahiers de recherche CREATE 2012-4, CREATE.
    10. Hubacek, Klaus & Giljum, Stefan, 2003. "Applying physical input-output analysis to estimate land appropriation (ecological footprints) of international trade activities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 137-151, February.
    11. Lei Li & Chenzi Pan & Shuai Ling & Mingqi Li, 2022. "Ecological Efficiency of Urban Industrial Land in Metropolitan Areas: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fanchao Kong & Kaixiao Zhang & Hengshu Fu & Lina Cui & Yang Li & Tengteng Wang, 2023. "Temporal–Spatial Variations and Convergence Analysis of Land Use Eco-Efficiency in the Urban Agglomerations of the Yellow River Basin in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-20, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuaishuai Han & Bindong Sun, 2019. "Impact of Population Density on PM 2.5 Concentrations: A Case Study in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Carozzi, Felipe & Roth, Sefi, 2023. "Dirty density: Air quality and the density of American cities," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    3. Carl Gaigné & Jacques-François Thisse, 2013. "New Economic Geography and the City," Working Papers SMART 13-02, INRAE UMR SMART.
    4. Castells-Quintana, David & Dienesch, Elisa & Krause, Melanie, 2021. "Air pollution in an urban world: A global view on density, cities and emissions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    5. Lewandowska Aleksandra & Piasecki Adam, 2019. "Selected aspects of water and sewage management in Poland in the context of sustainable urban development," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 45(45), pages 149-157, September.
    6. Denant-Boemont, Laurent & Gaigné, Carl & Gaté, Romain, 2018. "Urban spatial structure, transport-related emissions and welfare," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 29-45.
    7. Stéphane De Cara & Anne Fournier & Carl Gaigné, 2011. "Feeding the cities and greenhouse gas emissions: a new economic geography approach," Working Papers 1109, Chaire Economie du climat.
    8. Xinyue Hu & Han Yan & Deng Wang & Zhuoqun Zhao & Guoqin Zhang & Tao Lin & Hong Ye, 2020. "A Promotional Construction Approach for an Urban Three-Dimensional Compactness Model—Law-of-Gravitation-Based," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-10, August.
    9. Rémy Le Boennec & Florent Sari, 2015. "Subcenters, mode choice and transport policies: evidence form Nantes [Nouvelles centralités, choix modal et politiques de déplacements : le cas nantais]," Post-Print hal-01657242, HAL.
    10. Rémy Le Boennec & Sterenn Lucas, 2020. "Does a positive density perception increase the probability of living in the ideal housing type? Evidence from the Loire-Atlantique Département in France," Working Papers hal-02441513, HAL.
    11. Wu, Jianxin & Xu, Hui & Tang, Kai, 2021. "Industrial agglomeration, CO2 emissions and regional development programs: A decomposition analysis based on 286 Chinese cities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    12. Leibowicz, Benjamin D., 2020. "Urban land use and transportation planning for climate change mitigation: A theoretical framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 604-616.
    13. Rainald Borck & Takatoshi Tabuchi, 2019. "Pollution and city size: can cities be too small?," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(5), pages 995-1020.
    14. Fan, Pengda & Qian, Xuepeng & Wang, Jian, 2023. "Does gender diversity matter? Female directors and firm carbon emissions in Japan," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    15. Poruschi, Lavinia & Ambrey, Christopher L., 2018. "Densification, what does it mean for fuel poverty and energy justice? An empirical analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 208-217.
    16. Ma, Jun & Cheng, Jack C.P., 2016. "Estimation of the building energy use intensity in the urban scale by integrating GIS and big data technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 182-192.
    17. Olga Tzanni & Paraskevas Nikolaou & Stella Giannakopoulou & Apostolos Arvanitis & Socrates Basbas, 2022. "Social Dimensions of Spatial Justice in the Use of the Public Transport System in Thessaloniki, Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-26, November.
    18. Youcef MECHOUAR & V Hovelaque & C Gaigné, 2021. "Effect of raw material substitution on the facility location decision under a carbon tax policy," Post-Print hal-04155066, HAL.
    19. Kahn, Matthew E. & Walsh, Randall, 2015. "Cities and the Environment," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: Gilles Duranton & J. V. Henderson & William C. Strange (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 405-465, Elsevier.
    20. Blaudin de Thé, Camille & Carantino, Benjamin & Lafourcade, Miren, 2021. "The carbon ‘carprint’ of urbanization: New evidence from French cities," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:11:y:2022:i:5:p:727-:d:813813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.