IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i16p4351-d1725104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing How Energy Policy Uncertainty, Geopolitical Risk, and R&D Investment Shapes Renewable Energy and Fossil Fuels

Author

Listed:
  • Selin Karlilar Pata

    (Department of Economics, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, 31000 Antakya, Türkiye
    Clinic of Economics, Azerbaijan State University of Economics (UNEC), 1001 Baku, Azerbaijan
    Economic Research Center (BAAU-ERC), Baku Eurasian University, 1101 Baku, Azerbaijan
    Applied Science Research Center, Applied Science Private University, Amman 11937, Jordan)

  • Ugur Korkut Pata

    (Department of Economics, Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, 31000 Antakya, Türkiye
    Clinic of Economics, Azerbaijan State University of Economics (UNEC), 1001 Baku, Azerbaijan
    Applied Science Research Center, Applied Science Private University, Amman 11937, Jordan
    Department of Economics, College of Political Science and Economics, Korea University, Seoul 02481, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study examines the comparative impact of energy policy uncertainty, geopolitical risk, and R&D expenditures on renewable and fossil fuel consumption in China from 2002m1 to 2022m12, using Fourier ADL, fully modified and dynamic ordinary least squares methods. The analysis aims to clarify how these key factors shape the country’s energy transition. The results show that energy policy uncertainty significantly promotes renewable energy but has no significant impact on fossil fuel consumption. Geopolitical risk increases the adoption of renewables, while fossil fuel consumption decreases, reflecting concerns about energy security. R&D expenditure contributes to the growth of both renewable and fossil fuel consumption, indicating a dual investment path in China’s energy strategy. These findings underscore the importance of consistent energy policies, reduced reliance on imported fossil fuels, and targeted R&D investment to support China’s transition to a low-carbon energy future. To effectively promote renewable energy and reduce dependence on fossil fuels, China should stabilize its energy policy environment, redirect R&D funding to clean technologies, and treat geopolitical risks as a strategic driver to accelerate domestic renewable energy capacity and energy self-sufficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Selin Karlilar Pata & Ugur Korkut Pata, 2025. "Comparing How Energy Policy Uncertainty, Geopolitical Risk, and R&D Investment Shapes Renewable Energy and Fossil Fuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-16, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:16:p:4351-:d:1725104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/16/4351/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/16/4351/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:16:p:4351-:d:1725104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.