IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i11p2816-d1666806.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Diffusion of Green Energy Technological Innovation from the Perspective of International Cooperation

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Li

    (College of Humanities and Foreign Languages, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Jun Wu

    (Shaanxi Coal Industry Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710100, China)

  • Xin-Ping Wang

    (School of Management, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China)

Abstract

The diffusion of green energy technological innovation based on international green energy cooperation is a critical pathway to achieving global low-carbon emission reductions. However, few studies have considered the innovation diffusion pathways of green energy technologies under bilateral policy uncertainties. This paper constructs an evolutionary game model for the diffusion of green energy technological innovation in a complex network environment, with a focus on analyzing the impacts of key parameters such as policy spillover effects, technological heterogeneity, technical leakage risks, and free-riding risks on the equilibrium outcomes of evolutionary strategies. The results of the study are as follows: (1) Technological synergy and technological heterogeneity have a significant role in promoting the diffusion of green energy technological innovation, but when technological heterogeneity is too high, it is difficult for the two parties to find more common interests and areas of technological interaction, and the cooperative innovation will be turned into an empty shell that has a name but no reality. (2) Policy uncertainty has a significant impact on the diffusion of green energy technology innovation, and the specific impact depends on the type of policy, policy intensity, policy spillover effects, and other key parameters. (3) The risk of technological obsolescence has prompted countries to deeply participate in green energy international cooperation to realize the “curved road overtaking” of green energy technology based on technological locking and latecomer advantages; due to the existence of the phenomenon of “free-riding”, the logic of value creation based on win–win cooperation is replaced by the opportunism of “enjoying the benefits”, and cooperative innovation may be turned into a one-time “handshake agreement”. The existence of the risk of technology leakage can turn collaborative innovation into a “witch hunt” by the underdog against the overdog, and the diffusion process of green energy technology innovation is led in the wrong direction.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Li & Jun Wu & Xin-Ping Wang, 2025. "Research on the Diffusion of Green Energy Technological Innovation from the Perspective of International Cooperation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:11:p:2816-:d:1666806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/11/2816/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/11/2816/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yaohong Yang & Shuwen Yang & Yang Yang & Xiaodan Yun & Yonghao Wang, 2024. "Study on Green Transformation Evolution of Construction Enterprises Based on Dissemination and Complex Network Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-25, November.
    2. Rennings, Klaus, 2000. "Redefining innovation -- eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 319-332, February.
    3. Corrocher, Nicoletta & Mancusi, Maria Luisa, 2021. "International collaborations in green energy technologies: What is the role of distance in environmental policy stringency?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    4. Feng, Nan & Ge, Jiamin, 2024. "How does fiscal policy affect the green low-carbon transition from the perspective of the evolutionary game?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    5. Jiang, Qichuan & Ma, Xuejiao & Wang, Yun, 2021. "How does the one belt one road initiative affect the green economic growth?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    6. Jie Gao & Qingmei Tan & Bo Cui, 2024. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of New Energy Transition Among Government, Traditional Automobile Enterprises, and Research Institutions Under the Dual Carbon Goals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Wetzel, Manuel & Gils, Hans Christian & Bertsch, Valentin, 2023. "Green energy carriers and energy sovereignty in a climate neutral European energy system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 591-603.
    8. Wei He & Rujie Liu & Tao Han & Jicheng Zhang & Yixun Lei & Shan Xu & Hongwei Yu & Zhu Li, 2024. "Cooperative Construction of Renewable Energy and Energy Storage System: Research on Evolutionary Game Model Based on Continuous Strategy and Random Disturbance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-24, November.
    9. Jennifer F. Reinganum, 1981. "Market Structure and the Diffusion of New Technology," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 12(2), pages 618-624, Autumn.
    10. Bega, François & Lin, Boqiang, 2023. "China's belt & road initiative energy cooperation: International assessment of the power projects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    11. Da Gao & Linfang Tan & Yue Chen, 2025. "Smarter is greener: can intelligent manufacturing improve enterprises’ ESG performance?," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Zhao, Dan & Ji, Shou-feng & Wang, He-ping & Jiang, Li-wen, 2021. "How do government subsidies promote new energy vehicle diffusion in the complex network context? A three-stage evolutionary game model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    13. Hanif, Waqas & El Khoury, Rim & Arfaoui, Nadia & Hammoudeh, Shawkat, 2025. "Are interconnectedness and spillover alike across green sectors during the COVID-19 and the Russia–Ukraine conflict?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    14. Veugelers, Reinhilde, 2012. "Which policy instruments to induce clean innovating?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1770-1778.
    15. Xu, Yi & Zhao, Fang, 2023. "Impact of energy depletion, human development, and income distribution on natural resource sustainability," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    16. Yihua Zhang & Xinxin Hong & Yuan Wang, 2023. "Study on the Coupled and Coordinated Development and Evolution of Digital Economy and Green Technology Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-23, May.
    17. Chen, Feng & Wu, Bin & Lou, Wen-qian & Zhu, Bo-wen, 2024. "Impact of dual-credit policy on diffusion of technology R & D among automakers: Based on an evolutionary game model with technology-spillover in complex network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    18. Morgan Bazilian & Michael Bradshaw & Johannes Gabriel & Andreas Goldthau & Kirsten Westphal, 2020. "Four scenarios of the energy transition: Drivers, consequences, and implications for geopolitics," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), March.
    19. Yu, Donghui & Gu, Baihe & Zhu, Kaiwei & Yang, Jiawen & Sheng, Yuhui, 2024. "Risk analysis of China's renewable energy cooperation with belt and road economies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    20. Rodriguez-Gonzalez, Pablo T. & Rico-Martinez, Ramiro & Rico-Ramirez, Vicente, 2018. "An integrated stochastic economic-ecological-social model with stratified-population," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 15-26.
    21. Yuan, Ning & Li, Meijuan, 2024. "Research on collaborative innovation behavior of enterprise innovation ecosystem under evolutionary game," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patricia Laurens & Christian Le Bas & Stéphane Lhuillery & Antoine Schoen, 2017. "The determinants of cleaner energy innovations of the world’s largest firms: the impact of firm learning and knowledge capital," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 311-333, May.
    2. Xu, Kunliang & Shao, Yanmin & Hu, Yiwen, 2025. "Responding to perceived environmental policy uncertainty with green technological innovation engagement: Evidence from a text-based measure," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    3. Ester Martínez‐Ros & Rasi Kunapatarawong, 2019. "Green innovation and knowledge: The role of size," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 1045-1059, September.
    4. Dewick, Paul & Maytorena-Sanchez, Eunice & Winch, Graham, 2019. "Regulation and regenerative eco-innovation: the case of extracted materials in the UK," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 38-51.
    5. Francesco Crespi & Claudia Ghisetti & Francesco Quatraro, 2015. "Environmental and innovation policies for the evolution of green technologies: a survey and a test," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 5(2), pages 343-370, December.
    6. Horbach, Jens & Rammer, Christian, 2025. "Climate change affectedness and innovation in firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    7. Alexandra Rese & Anke Kutschke & Daniel Baier, 2016. "Analyzing The Relative Influence Of Supply Side, Demand Side And Regulatory Factors On The Success Of Collaborative Energy Innovation Projects," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(02), pages 1-43, February.
    8. Shuhong Peng & Jing Qian & Xiuwei Xing & Jing Wang & Aliya Adeli & Shujie Wei, 2025. "Technological Cooperation for Sustainable Development Under the Belt and Road Initiative and the Sustainable Development Goals: Opportunities and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-27, January.
    9. Elisenda Jové‐Llopis & Agustí Segarra‐Blasco, 2018. "Eco‐innovation strategies: A panel data analysis of Spanish manufacturing firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1209-1220, December.
    10. Costa-Campi, M.T. & García-Quevedo, J. & Martínez-Ros, E., 2017. "What are the determinants of investment in environmental R&D?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 455-465.
    11. Grazia Cecere & Nicoletta Corrocher & Cédric Gossart & Muge Ozman, 2014. "Lock-in and path dependence: an evolutionary approach to eco-innovations," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 1037-1065, November.
    12. Gao, Weiyan & Wang, Yuzhang & Wang, Fengrong & Mbanyele, William, 2024. "Do environmental courts break collusion in environmental governance? Evidence from corporate green innovation in China," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 133-149.
    13. Elisenda Jové‐Llopis & Agustí Segarra‐Blasco, 2020. "Why does eco‐innovation differ in service firms? Some insights from Spain," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 918-938, March.
    14. Jana Hojnik, 2017. "In Pursuit of Eco-innovation," UPP Monograph Series, University of Primorska Press, number 978-961-7023-53-4.
    15. Claudia Ghisetti & Massimiliano Mazzanti & Susanna Mancinelli & Mariangela Zoli, 2015. "Do financial constraints make the environment worse off? Understanding the effects of financial barriers on environmental innovations," SEEDS Working Papers 0115, SEEDS, Sustainability Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies, revised Jan 2015.
    16. Peiró-Signes, Ángel & Segarra-Oña, Marival & Trull-Domínguez, Óscar & Sánchez-Planelles, Joaquín, 2022. "Exposing the ideal combination of endogenous–exogenous drivers for companies’ ecoinnovative orientation: Results from machine-learning methods," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    17. Fusillo, Fabrizio, 2023. "Green Technologies and diversity in the knowledge search and output phases: Evidence from European Patents," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(4).
    18. Borghesi, Simone & Cainelli, Giulio & Mazzanti, Massimiliano, 2015. "Linking emission trading to environmental innovation: Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 669-683.
    19. Corrocher, Nicoletta & Mancusi, Maria Luisa, 2021. "International collaborations in green energy technologies: What is the role of distance in environmental policy stringency?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    20. Katharina Friz, 2021. "A question of regulation or motivation? Environmental innovation activities in transition economies," Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation 2107, University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:11:p:2816-:d:1666806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.