IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i8p812-d1631083.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing Spray Technology and Nitrogen Sources for Wheat Grain Protein Enhancement

Author

Listed:
  • S. O. Abiola

    (Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Ferguson College of Agriculture, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA)

  • R. Sharry

    (Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Ferguson College of Agriculture, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA)

  • J. Bushong

    (Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Ferguson College of Agriculture, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA)

  • D. B. Arnall

    (Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Ferguson College of Agriculture, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078, USA)

Abstract

Increasing wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) grain protein concentration (GPC) without excessive nitrogen (N) inputs requires understanding the interactions between N source characteristics and application technology parameters. This study evaluated the effects of foliar N applications at anthesis on wheat grain yield and GPC across three locations over three growing seasons in Oklahoma. Treatments consisted of two N sources (urea-ammonium nitrate [UAN] and aqueous urea [Aq. urea]), three nozzle types (flat fan [FF], 3D, and twin [TW]), and two droplet types (fine and coarse). Late foliar applications increased GPC by 12% without affecting grain yield (0.5–5.8 Mg ha −1 ). During the 2020–21 growing season, a late season freeze during anthesis resulted in no significant differences in GPC across locations. UAN produced significantly higher GPC (13.7%) than Aq. urea (13.1%). Among nozzle types, the 3D nozzle consistently produced the highest GPC (13.8%), compared to FF (13.1%) and TW nozzles (13.2%). Two-way interactions revealed UAN with fine droplets achieved consistently high GPC (14.6%), as did Aq. urea with coarse droplets (14.5%) at Lake Carl Blackwell in 2021–22 as compared to Aq. Urea_Fine (13.8%). At Chickasha 2021–22 and Perkins 2020–21, a significant three-way interaction was observed, with the UAN_3D_Fine (13.2%) and UAN_3D_Coarse (12.2%) treatments producing the highest GPC, with 8% and 15% greater than the Aq. Urea_TW_Fine, respectively, which is lowest. These findings provide a foundation for precision agriculture approaches that optimize foliar N application parameters to enhance wheat quality while maintaining sustainable production practices.

Suggested Citation

  • S. O. Abiola & R. Sharry & J. Bushong & D. B. Arnall, 2025. "Optimizing Spray Technology and Nitrogen Sources for Wheat Grain Protein Enhancement," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:8:p:812-:d:1631083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/8/812/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/8/812/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neville Millar & G. Robertson & Peter Grace & Ron Gehl & John Hoben, 2010. "Nitrogen fertilizer management for nitrous oxide (N 2 O) mitigation in intensive corn (Maize) production: an emissions reduction protocol for US Midwest agriculture," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 185-204, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew Houser, 2022. "Does adopting a nitrogen best management practice reduce nitrogen fertilizer rates?," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(1), pages 79-94, March.
    2. Aurore Philibert & Chantal Loyce & David Makowski, 2012. "Quantifying Uncertainties in N2O Emission Due to N Fertilizer Application in Cultivated Areas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-9, November.
    3. Luncheng You & Gerard H. Ros & Yongliang Chen & Qi Shao & Madaline D. Young & Fusuo Zhang & Wim de Vries, 2023. "Global mean nitrogen recovery efficiency in croplands can be enhanced by optimal nutrient, crop and soil management practices," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Grace, Peter R. & Philip Robertson, G. & Millar, Neville & Colunga-Garcia, Manuel & Basso, Bruno & Gage, Stuart H. & Hoben, John, 2011. "The contribution of maize cropping in the Midwest USA to global warming: A regional estimate," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(3), pages 292-296, March.
    5. Amy W. Ando & Shibashis Mukherjee, 2012. "Benefits of pollution monitoring technology for greenhouse gas offset markets," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 32(1), pages 122-136.
    6. Hardeep Singh & Brian K. Northup & Gurjinder S. Baath & Prashanth P. Gowda & Vijaya G. Kakani, 2020. "Greenhouse mitigation strategies for agronomic and grazing lands of the US Southern Great Plains," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 819-853, May.
    7. Athanasios Balafoutis & Bert Beck & Spyros Fountas & Jurgen Vangeyte & Tamme Van der Wal & Iria Soto & Manuel Gómez-Barbero & Andrew Barnes & Vera Eory, 2017. "Precision Agriculture Technologies Positively Contributing to GHG Emissions Mitigation, Farm Productivity and Economics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-28, July.
    8. Allen G Good & Perrin H Beatty, 2011. "Fertilizing Nature: A Tragedy of Excess in the Commons," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-9, August.
    9. Zhang, Guo & Wang, Xiaoke & Sun, Binfeng & Zhao, Hong & Lu, Fei & Zhang, Lu, 2016. "Status of mineral nitrogen fertilization and net mitigation potential of the state fertilization recommendation in Chinese cropland," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1-10.
    10. Mandrini, German & Pittelkow, Cameron M. & Archontoulis, Sotirios V. & Mieno, Taro & Martin, Nicolas F., 2021. "Understanding differences between static and dynamic nitrogen fertilizer tools using simulation modeling," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    11. Claassen, Roger & Duquette, Eric & Horowitz, John & Kohei, Ueda, 2014. "Additionality in U.S. Agricultural Conservation and Regulatory Offset Programs," Economic Research Report 180414, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    12. Williamson, James M., 2010. "Does Information Matter? Assessing the Role of Information and Prices in the Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Decision," 2010 Annual Meeting, July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado 60892, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Horowitz, John K. & Just, Richard E., 2013. "Economics of additionality for environmental services from agriculture," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 105-122.
    14. Williamson, James M., 2011. "The Role of Information and Prices in the Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Decision: New Evidence from the Agricultural Resource Management Survey," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 36(3), pages 1-21.
    15. Ning, Zhuo & Hou, Yuke & Xu, Xia, 2024. "Optimized strategies for nitrogen fertilizer application in Populus plantations in the context of climate change mitigation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    16. Sunling, Yang & Shahzad, Ali & Wang, Meng & Xi, Yueling & Shaik, Mohammed Rafi & Khan, Mujeeb, 2024. "Urease and nitrification inhibitors with drip fertigation strategies to mitigate global warming potential and improve water-nitrogen efficiency of maize under semi-arid regions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    17. Francisco Rosas & Bruce Babcock & Dermot Hayes, 2015. "Nitrous oxide emission reductions from cutting excessive nitrogen fertilizer applications," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 132(2), pages 353-367, September.
    18. Hoque, Mohammad Mainul, 2015. "Essays on natural resources and labor economics," ISU General Staff Papers 201501010800005583, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    19. Izaurralde, R. César & McGill, William B. & Williams, Jimmy R. & Jones, Curtis D. & Link, Robert P. & Manowitz, David H. & Schwab, D. Elisabeth & Zhang, Xuesong & Robertson, G. Philip & Millar, Nevill, 2017. "Simulating microbial denitrification with EPIC: Model description and evaluation," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 359(C), pages 349-362.
    20. Rebecca F. Graham & Sam E. Wortman & Cameron M. Pittelkow, 2017. "Comparison of Organic and Integrated Nutrient Management Strategies for Reducing Soil N 2 O Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-14, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:8:p:812-:d:1631083. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.