IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/201509010700001540.html

Nitrous oxide emission reductions from cutting excessive nitrogen fertilizer applications

Author

Listed:
  • Rosas, Francisco
  • Babcock, Bruce A.
  • Hayes, Dermot J.

Abstract

Farmers may choose to apply nitrogen fertilizer at a rate that exceeds the average ex post agronomically optimal rate when the yield response to nitrogen varies across growing seasons. Negative environmental consequences such as nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and/or water pollution can result when all the applied nitrogen is not needed by the crop. Here we consider a nonlinear market instrument targeting farmers’ nitrogen use, and by solving for the optimal nitrogen reduction using a model of expected utility of farm profits, we evaluate the induced N2O emission reductions that are consistent with the instrument introduced. The market instrument is nonlinear because of the expected nonlinear relationship between N2O and nitrogen application rates. Our simulations show that, in cases where farmers apply N at rates which exceed recommendations and the N2O response is likely to be non-linear, payments will induce participation in the program and will have a significant impact on both expected and actual N2O emissions without significantly harming expected or actual yields. Failure to consider this nonlinearity would deviate the attention away from N2O pollution because it would require large N reductions (and crop yields) to achieve equivalent N2O abatement.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosas, Francisco & Babcock, Bruce A. & Hayes, Dermot J., 2015. "Nitrous oxide emission reductions from cutting excessive nitrogen fertilizer applications," ISU General Staff Papers 201509010700001540, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:201509010700001540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/afcf5f1e-8d20-4e99-8965-5978413579e1/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Francisco Rosas & Sergio H Lence, 2019. "How Reliable is Duality Theory in Empirical Work?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 101(3), pages 825-848.
    2. Mitchell E. Baum & John E. Sawyer & Emerson D. Nafziger & Michael J. Castellano & Marshall D. McDaniel & Mark A. Licht & Dermot J. Hayes & Matthew J. Helmers & Sotirios V. Archontoulis, 2025. "The optimum nitrogen fertilizer rate for maize in the US Midwest is increasing," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:201509010700001540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.