IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i7p1190-d1438758.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential and Pathways of Carbon Emission Reduction in China’s Beef Production from the Supply Chain Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Lijun Zhang

    (College of Economics and Management, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071000, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Gaofei Yin

    (College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Hebei Province Key Laboratory for Farmland Eco-Environment, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071000, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Zihao Wei

    (College of Economics and Management, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071000, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Wenchao Li

    (College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Hebei Province Key Laboratory for Farmland Eco-Environment, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071000, China)

  • Cha Cui

    (College of Economics and Management, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071000, China)

  • Mingli Wang

    (Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 10081, China)

  • Chen Zhao

    (College of Economics and Management, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071000, China)

  • Huifeng Zhao

    (College of Economics and Management, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071000, China)

  • Fengrui Xue

    (College of Economics and Management, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071000, China)

Abstract

Beef production is the primary contributor to greenhouse gas emissions in animal husbandry. But the carbon emission distribution, potential for carbon reduction, and pathways in the main links of the beef cattle industry chain are not yet clear. Balancing efficiency and fairness while taking tailored emission reduction paths according to local conditions is crucial in helping to achieve the low-carbon animal husbandry and “dual carbon” goals. This research adopts an industry chain perspective to assess four leading beef production regions’ carbon emissions, potential, and pathways in China from 2007 to 2021. We use life cycle assessment, the potential index which considers efficiency and fairness; the results are as follows: (1) The potential for carbon emission reduction in China’s beef industry showed an inverted U-shaped change trend from 2007 to 2021, and the average potential for carbon emission reduction in most provinces fluctuated around 0.500. (2) The main producing areas of China’s beef industry were divided into four areas of high efficiency and low fairness (Area A); high efficiency and high fairness (Area B); low efficiency and low fairness (Area C); and low efficiency and high fairness (Area D). (3) Differentiated emission reduction pathways were designed to reduce emissions, highlighting the need to implement region-specific carbon reduction policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Lijun Zhang & Gaofei Yin & Zihao Wei & Wenchao Li & Cha Cui & Mingli Wang & Chen Zhao & Huifeng Zhao & Fengrui Xue, 2024. "Potential and Pathways of Carbon Emission Reduction in China’s Beef Production from the Supply Chain Perspective," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-22, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:7:p:1190-:d:1438758
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/7/1190/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/7/1190/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hyland, J.J. & Styles, D. & Jones, D.L. & Williams, A.P., 2016. "Improving livestock production efficiencies presents a major opportunity to reduce sectoral greenhouse gas emissions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 123-131.
    2. Hongpeng Guo & Zixu Su & Xiao Yang & Shuang Xu & Hong Pan, 2022. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Beef Cattle Breeding Based on the Ecological Cycle Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Liu, Hongbo & Parton, Kevin A. & Zhou, Zhang-Yue & Cox, Rod, 2009. "At-home meat consumption in China: an empirical study," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 53(4), pages 1-17.
    4. Hongbo Liu & Kevin A. Parton & Zhang-Yue Zhou & Rod Cox, 2009. "At-home meat consumption in China: an empirical study ," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 53(4), pages 485-501, October.
    5. Zhang, Wei & Li, Jing & Li, Guoxiang & Guo, Shucen, 2020. "Emission reduction effect and carbon market efficiency of carbon emissions trading policy in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    6. van Selm, Benjamin & de Boer, Imke J.M. & Ledgard, Stewart F. & van Middelaar, Corina E., 2021. "Reducing greenhouse gas emissions of New Zealand beef through better integration of dairy and beef production," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    7. Wei, Chu & Ni, Jinlan & Du, Limin, 2012. "Regional allocation of carbon dioxide abatement in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 552-565.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lei, Lei & Shimokawa, Satoru, 2020. "Promoting dietary guidelines and environmental sustainability in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    2. Sara M. Torres & Emilio F. Moran & Ramon Felipe Bicudo da Silva, 2017. "Property Rights and the Soybean Revolution: Shaping How China and Brazil Are Telecoupled," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Rentsch, Dennis & Damon, Amy, 2013. "Prices, poaching, and protein alternatives: An analysis of bushmeat consumption around Serengeti National Park, Tanzania," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1-9.
    4. Jacob Hawkins & Chunbo Ma & Steven Schilizzi & Fan Zhang, 2018. "China's changing diet and its impacts on greenhouse gas emissions: an index decomposition analysis," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(1), pages 45-64, January.
    5. Vardges Hovhannisyan & Stephen Devadoss, 2020. "Effects of urbanization on food demand in China," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 699-721, February.
    6. Bai, Junfei & Seale Jr, James L. & Wahl, Thomas I., 2020. "Meat demand in China: to include or not to include meat away from home?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(01), January.
    7. Gao, Siqi & Cuffey, Joel & Li, Gucheng & Li, Wenying, 2024. "Diet in China during substantial economic growth: Quality, inequality, trends, and determinants," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    8. Paris, Quirino & Caracciolo, Francesco, 2014. "Testing the adding up condition in demand systems," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182827, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Ma, Meilin & Wang, H. Holly & Hua, Yizhou & Qin, Fei & Yang, Jing, 2021. "African swine fever in China: Impacts, responses, and policy implications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    10. Reshmita Nath & Yibo Luan & Wangming Yang & Chen Yang & Wen Chen & Qian Li & Xuefeng Cui, 2015. "Changes in Arable Land Demand for Food in India and China: A Potential Threat to Food Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-27, April.
    11. Cao, Li‐Juan & Tian, Wei‐Ming & Wang, Ji‐Min & Malcolm, Bill & Liu, Hong‐Bo & Zhou, Zhang‐Yue, 2013. "Recent Food Consumption Trends in China and Trade," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 21, pages 1-30.
    12. Xin Gu & Zhang-Yue Zhou & Yan-Rui Wu, 2019. "Understanding China’S Urban Consumption Patterns: New Estimates And Implications," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 64(04), pages 961-981, September.
    13. Hovhannisyan, Vardges & Devadoss, Stephen, 2017. "Effects of Urbanization on Food Demand in China," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258436, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Wen Lin & David L. Ortega & Danielle Ufer & Vincenzina Caputo & Titus Awokuse, 2022. "Blockchain‐based traceability and demand for U.S. beef in China," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(1), pages 253-272, March.
    15. Qiuyue Xia & Lu Li & Jie Dong & Bin Zhang, 2021. "Reduction Effect and Mechanism Analysis of Carbon Trading Policy on Carbon Emissions from Land Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    16. Ni, Jinlan & Wei, Chu & Du, Limin, 2015. "Revealing the political decision toward Chinese carbon abatement: Based on equity and efficiency criteria," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 609-621.
    17. Ying Zhang & Yingli Huang, 2023. "Killing Two Birds with One Stone or Missing One of Them? The Synergistic Governance Effect of China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme on Pollution Control and Carbon Emission Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-25, June.
    18. Yongrok Choi & Hyoungsuk Lee, 2023. "Current Advances in Green Governance and CO 2 Emissions towards Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-8, August.
    19. Yan Li & Yigang Wei & Hanxiao Xu & Huanwen Liu & Julien Chevallier, 2023. "Carbon monoxide and multi‐pollutants flow between China and India: A multiregional input–output model," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(8), pages 2514-2537, August.
    20. Du, Limin & Hanley, Aoife & Wei, Chu, 2015. "Estimating the Marginal Abatement Cost Curve of CO2 Emissions in China: Provincial Panel Data Analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 217-229.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:7:p:1190-:d:1438758. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.