IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i9p1695-d1226976.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

World Forage Import Market: Competitive Structure and Market Forces

Author

Listed:
  • Wenxin Wang

    (College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Yaowen Liang

    (College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Zhuo Ru

    (College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Haojie Guo

    (College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Bingjie Zhao

    (College of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Trade market power serves as a significant indicator of pricing power within the trade market. This paper aims to examine the market structure of global forage trade from 1997 to 2020 and assess the market power of forage exporters in major importing countries, namely Japan, China, and South Korea, by utilizing an extended G-K model based on the theory of residual elasticity of demand. The findings of this analysis provide several key insights. Firstly, it is revealed that the United States and Australia hold a monopoly on forage trade, while China has emerged as the most pivotal market for worldwide forage trade. Notably, China’s growing demand for forage imports is profoundly influencing the global forage trade landscape. Secondly, the extent and effectiveness of exporting countries’ market power in forage-importing nations, such as China, varies considerably. Lastly, the market power of forage-exporting countries is determined by various factors, including the demand for forage in importing nations, export monopoly, import structure, demand elasticity, and the level of marketization.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenxin Wang & Yaowen Liang & Zhuo Ru & Haojie Guo & Bingjie Zhao, 2023. "World Forage Import Market: Competitive Structure and Market Forces," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:9:p:1695-:d:1226976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/9/1695/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/9/1695/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pakes, Ariel, 2017. "Empirical tools and competition analysis: Past progress and current problems," Scholarly Articles 34710163, Harvard University Department of Economics.
    2. Pakes, Ariel, 2017. "Empirical tools and competition analysis: Past progress and current problems," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 241-266.
    3. Andrew Atkeson & Ariel Burstein, 2008. "Pricing-to-Market, Trade Costs, and International Relative Prices," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(5), pages 1998-2031, December.
    4. Doireann Fitzgerald & Stefanie Haller, 2014. "Pricing-to-Market: Evidence From Plant-Level Prices," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 81(2), pages 761-786.
    5. Jinho Jung & Juan Sesmero & Ralph Siebert, 2022. "A structural estimation of spatial differentiation and market power in input procurement," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(2), pages 613-644, March.
    6. Kim , Seong-Hoon & Moon , Seongman, 2014. "A Risk Map of Markups: Why We Observe Mixed Behaviors of Markups," Staff Papers 14-5, Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
    7. Song, Baohui & Marchant, Mary A. & Reed, Michael R. & Xu, Shuang, 2009. "Competitive Analysis and Market Power of China’s Soybean Import Market," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, February.
    8. Oleksandr Perekhozhuk & Thomas Glauben & Michael Grings & Ramona Teuber, 2017. "Approaches And Methods For The Econometric Analysis Of Market Power: A Survey And Empirical Comparison," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 303-325, February.
    9. Athukorala, Premachandra & Menon, Jayant, 1994. "Pricing to Market Behaviour and Exchange Rate Pass-Through in Japanese Exports," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 104(423), pages 271-281, March.
    10. Henry W. Kinnucan & Nguyen Duc Minh & Dengjun Zhang, 2017. "Trade diversion and antidumping effectiveness: insights from a residual demand model," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 61(2), pages 324-340, April.
    11. Beccarello, Massimo, 1997. "Time series analysis of market power: Evidence from G-7 manufacturing," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 123-136, February.
    12. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262232588, December.
    13. Goldberg, Pinelopi Koujianou & Knetter, Michael M., 1999. "Measuring the intensity of competition in export markets," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 27-60, February.
    14. Jakubik, Adam & Keck, Alexander & Piermartini, Roberta, 2022. "Trade policy implications of a changing world: Tariffs and import market power," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2022-14, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    15. Arthur Lewbel, 1997. "Constructing Instruments for Regressions with Measurement Error when no Additional Data are Available, with an Application to Patents and R&D," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 65(5), pages 1201-1214, September.
    16. Zhichao Guo & Feiyu Qin, 2022. "An Empirical Analysis of the Role of Forage Product Trade on Grassland Quality and Livestock Production in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Hall, Robert E, 1988. "The Relation between Price and Marginal Cost in U.S. Industry," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 96(5), pages 921-947, October.
    18. Adolfson, Malin, 2001. "Export price responses to exogenous exchange rate movements," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 91-96, April.
    19. Zsombor Pall & Oleksandr Perekhozhuk & Thomas Glauben & Sören Prehn & Ramona Teuber, 2014. "Residual demand measures of market power of Russian wheat exporters," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 45(3), pages 381-391, May.
    20. Roberta Piermartini & Adam Jakubik & Alexander Keck, 2022. "Trade Policy Implications of a Changing World: Tariffs and Import Market Power," IMF Working Papers 2022/219, International Monetary Fund.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evans, Edwardv A. & Ballen, Fredy H., 2015. "Competitive Behavior in the U.S. Green Skin Avocado Market," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 46(3), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Zhu, Xuehong & Zheng, Weihang & Zhang, Hongwei & Guo, Yaoqi, 2019. "Time-varying international market power for the Chinese iron ore markets," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    3. Silveira, Jáilison W. & Resende, Marcelo, 2020. "Competition in the international niobium market: A residual demand approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    4. Sengupta, Darpajit & Sinha Roy, Saikat, 2020. "Exchange Rate Pass-through: An exploration on India’s automobile sector," MPRA Paper 102533, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Md Deluair Hossen, 2023. "Exchange Rate Pass-Through and Data Frequency: Firm-Level Evidence from Bangladesh," Papers 2303.04101, arXiv.org.
    6. Gafarova, Gulmira & Perekhozhuk, Oleksandr & Glauben, Thomas, 2017. "Analysis Of Oligopolistic Behaviour Of Kazakh And Russian Exporters In The South Caucasus Wheat Market," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 261429, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Chen, Natalie & Juvenal, Luciana, 2022. "Markups, quality, and trade costs," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    8. Lukáš Čechura & Tinoush Jamali Jaghdani, 2021. "Market Imperfections within the European Wheat Value Chain: The Case of France and the United Kingdom," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, August.
    9. Andrew B. Bernard & J. Bradford Jensen & Stephen J. Redding & Peter K. Schott, 2018. "Global Firms," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 56(2), pages 565-619, June.
    10. Sabien Dobbelaere & Catherine Fuss & Mark Vancauteren, 2023. "Does offshoring shape labor market imperfections? A comparative analysis of Belgian and Dutch firms," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 23-006/V, Tinbergen Institute.
    11. Fontaine, François & Martin, Julien & Mejean, Isabelle, 2020. "Price discrimination within and across EMU markets: Evidence from French exporters," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    12. Kerstin Uhl & Oleksandr Perekhozhuk & Thomas Glauben, 2016. "Price Discrimination in Russian Wheat Exports: Evidence from Firm-level Data," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(3), pages 722-740, September.
    13. Sushanta Mallick & Helena Marques, 2008. "Passthrough of Exchange Rate and Tariffs into Import Prices of India: Currency Depreciation versus Import Liberalization," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(4), pages 765-782, September.
    14. Dvir, Eyal & Strasser, Georg, 2018. "Does marketing widen borders? Cross-country price dispersion in the European car market," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 134-149.
    15. Nakajima, Toru, 2012. "Estimating Time Variation of Market Power: Case of U.S. Soybean Exports," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124775, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Langlotz, Sarah & Potrafke, Niklas, 2019. "Does development aid increase military expenditure?," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 735-757.
    17. Chen Yeh & Claudia Macaluso & Brad Hershbein, 2022. "Monopsony in the US Labor Market," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(7), pages 2099-2138, July.
    18. Mary Amiti & Oleg Itskhoki & Jozef Konings, 2022. "Dominant Currencies: How Firms Choose Currency Invoicing and Why it Matters," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 137(3), pages 1435-1493.
    19. Roberto Rigobon & Brent Neiman & Alberto Cavallo, 2013. "Product Introductions, Currency Unions, and the Real Exchange Rate," 2013 Meeting Papers 1357, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    20. Harry Bloch & Michael Olive, 2001. "Pricing over the Cycle," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 19(1), pages 99-108, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:9:p:1695-:d:1226976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.