Systemic Risk and New International Financial Architecture: Reconciling KEYNES and Neo-Liberalism?
Facing the systemic crisis which originated in Mexico and in Asia, and spread to all financial centers, the objective of the new international financial architecture is to master the international financial instability; this means improving the transparency and the regulation of markets, as well as arousing a greater responsibility of public and private actors in the prevention and management of crises. But many interrogations subsist concerning the contours of the new architecture. Does it simply mean improving the transparency of information in order to prompt better practices? Or is it desirable to introduce new constraining rules as far as the international mobility of capital is concerned? Does it call for allocating new responsibilities, and therefore new resources, to the International Monetary Fund, or should the Bank for International Settlements, or a central banks club, be entrusted with such a mission? In fact, these questions arise mainly because there is no theoretical consensus among economists and official experts. Paradoxically this leads us to revisit the thought and theoretical inheritance of KEYNES. The growing importance, in current debates, of concepts such as confidence, liquidity, imperfection of financial markets, mimetic contagions, is striking in that respect. Furthermore, discussions about the international financial institutions remind debates that KEYNES started, in his Treatise on Money as well as during the preparation of the conference of Bretton Woods. In a nutshell, cannot one see in this new international financial architecture the revenge of KEYNES? In section 1, one replaces the project of international financial architecture in the context of systemic crisis of the 90’s. The basic principles of this architecture, as they appear in reports of the G 22 and the G7, are then reminded, in section 2. In section 3, one sheds a light on the keynesian foundations on which, according to us, this project partially rests, and draws some consequences on the responsibilities assigned to the International Financial Institutions.
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Paul Krugman, 1996. "Are Currency Crises Self-Fulfilling?," NBER Chapters, in: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1996, Volume 11, pages 345-407 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Stanley Fischer, 1999. "On the Need for an International Lender of Last Resort," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 13(4), pages 85-104, Fall.
- John Williamson, 2000. "The Role of the IMF: A Guide to the Reports," Policy Briefs PB00-5, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
- Michael Mussa & Giovanni Dell'Ariccia & Barry J. Eichengreen & Enrica Detragiache, 1998. "Capital Account Liberalization; Theoretical and Practical Aspects," IMF Occasional Papers 172, International Monetary Fund.
- Kenneth Rogoff, 1999.
"International Institutions for Reducing Global Financial Instability,"
NBER Working Papers
7265, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Kenneth Rogoff, 1999. "International Institutions for Reducing Global Financial Instability," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 13(4), pages 21-42, Fall.
- Cartapanis, Andre & Dropsy, Vincent & Mametz, Sophie, 2002. "The Asian Currency Crises: Vulnerability, Contagion, or Unsustainability," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1), pages 79-91, February.
- André Cartapanis, 2001.
"Economie politique de l'architecture financière internationale,"
Programme National Persée, vol. 52(2), pages 447-465.
- André Cartapanis, 2001. "Économie politique de l'architecture financière internationale," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 52(2), pages 447-465.
- Ruggie, John Gerard, 1982. "International regimes, transactions, and change: embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(02), pages 379-415, March.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:iv:y:2001:i:1-2:p:5-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Giorgos Zachopoulos)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.