IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ekm/repojs/v19y1999i1p101-128id1046.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

More instruments and broader goals: moving toward the Post-Washington Consensus

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph E. Stiglitz

Abstract

In this lecture the author acknowledges the failure of the “Washington Consensus”in promoting economic growth and proposes a new consensus where the state hasagain an active role. He starts from some lessons of the Asian crisis and concludes for theneed of broadening the goals of development. JEL Classification: O16; O11.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1999. "More instruments and broader goals: moving toward the Post-Washington Consensus," Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Center of Political Economy, vol. 19(1), pages 101-128.
  • Handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:19:y:1999:i:1:p:101-128:id:1046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org.br/repojs/index.php/journal/article/view/1046/1031
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Liberalization; economic growth; Washington consensus; determinants of development;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O16 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Financial Markets; Saving and Capital Investment; Corporate Finance and Governance
    • O11 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekm:repojs:v:19:y:1999:i:1:p:101-128:id:1046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Brazilian Journal of Political Economy (Brazil) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://centrodeeconomiapolitica.org/repojs/index.php/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.