IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v164y2025icp206-216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Freedom–enslavement” paradox in consumers’ adoption of smart transportation: A comparative analysis of three technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Xiaodi
  • Zhang, Dezhen
  • Nguyen, Cam Tu
  • Yuen, Kum Fai
  • Wang, Xueqin

Abstract

Rapid advancement in urbanisation has profoundly altered consumer travel using intelligent transportation technologies. However, as technological progress persists, inherent tensions in consumer–technology interactions have surfaced. Based on the technological paradox and learning tension theories, this study examines how consumers' interactions with intelligent transportation technologies influence the systems' adoption. Three representative transportation technologies–electronic toll collection systems, ride-sharing platforms and fully autonomous vehicles–are compared. Data were collected using a questionnaire administered to 524 participants. The findings revealed that, while these technologies allowed consumers’ significant freedom perception, they also introduced new dependencies, invoking a perception of enslavement. Surprisingly, the induced learning tensions showed a positive relationship with technology adoption, which suggests that the challenges encountered during the learning process can enhance user engagement and acceptance. Furthermore, the study emphasised how perceptions of freedom and enslavement evolve with technological advancement in different transportation contexts, indicating their complex interplay with technology adoption intention. The findings enhance our understanding of the technological paradox theory and elucidate the dual role of learning tensions. The results also provide theoretical and practical guidance for technology developers and policymakers to design more human-centric intelligent transportation systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Xiaodi & Zhang, Dezhen & Nguyen, Cam Tu & Yuen, Kum Fai & Wang, Xueqin, 2025. "“Freedom–enslavement” paradox in consumers’ adoption of smart transportation: A comparative analysis of three technologies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 206-216.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:164:y:2025:i:c:p:206-216
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.01.041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25000538
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.01.041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mick, David Glen & Fournier, Susan, 1998. "Paradoxes of Technology: Consumer Cognizance, Emotions, and Coping Strategies," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 25(2), pages 123-143, September.
    2. Tim Kautz & James J. Heckman & Ron Diris & Bas ter Weel & Lex Borghans, 2014. "Fostering and Measuring Skills: Improving Cognitive and Non-cognitive Skills to Promote Lifetime Success," OECD Education Working Papers 110, OECD Publishing.
    3. Park, Hyun Jung & Zhang, Yining, 2022. "Technology readiness and technology paradox of unmanned convenience store users," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    4. Horner, Hannah & Pazour, Jennifer & Mitchell, John E., 2021. "Optimizing driver menus under stochastic selection behavior for ridesharing and crowdsourced delivery," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    5. Zhu, Ge & Chen, Yuche & Zheng, Jiali, 2024. "Partially autonomous vehicles (PAVs) vs. fully autonomous vehicles (FAVs): A comparative study with adoption models," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    6. Koh, Le Yi & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2024. "The role of motivators, barriers, attractiveness, and positive emotions on consumers’ intention to adopt and resist self-driving delivery robots," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    7. Zhang, Liming & Yao, Xuejiao & Xiao, Yao & Zhang, Yingxin & Cai, Ming, 2024. "Mechanisms and implications of autonomous vehicle market penetration: Insights from a Markov forecasting model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 43-61.
    8. Adnan, Nadia & Md Nordin, Shahrina & bin Bahruddin, Mohamad Ariff & Ali, Murad, 2018. "How trust can drive forward the user acceptance to the technology? In-vehicle technology for autonomous vehicle," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 819-836.
    9. Weiling Zhuang & Maxwell K. Hsu & Kristen L. Brewer & Qian Xiao, 2013. "Paradoxes of social networking sites: an empirical analysis," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(1), pages 33-49, January.
    10. Zarbakhshnia, Navid & Ma, Zhenliang, 2024. "Critical success factors for the adoption of AVs in sustainable urban transportation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 62-76.
    11. Weiling Zhuang & Maxwell K. Hsu & Kristen L. Brewer & Qian Xiao, 2013. "Paradoxes of social networking sites: an empirical analysis," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(1), pages 33-49, January.
    12. Cai, Lanhui & Yuen, Kum Fai & Xie, Diancen & Fang, Mingjie & Wang, Xueqin, 2021. "Consumer's usage of logistics technologies: Integration of habit into the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    13. Correia, Gonçalo & Viegas, José Manuel, 2011. "Carpooling and carpool clubs: Clarifying concepts and assessing value enhancement possibilities through a Stated Preference web survey in Lisbon, Portugal," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 81-90, February.
    14. Andrew D. Foster & Mark R. Rosenzweig, 2010. "Microeconomics of Technology Adoption," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 2(1), pages 395-424, September.
    15. B.H. Schmitt & L. Zarantonello, 2013. "Consumer experience and experiential marketing: a critical review," Post-Print hal-00847411, HAL.
    16. Chou, Chun-Chen & Iamtrakul, Pawinee & Yoh, Kento & Miyata, Masato & Doi, Kenji, 2024. "Determining the role of self-efficacy in sustained behavior change: An empirical study on intention to use community-based electric ride-sharing," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    17. Koh, Le Yi & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Public acceptance of autonomous vehicles: Examining the joint influence of perceived vehicle performance and intelligent in-vehicle interaction quality," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    18. Yu Wang & Shanyong Wang & Jing Wang & Jiuchang Wei & Chenglin Wang, 2020. "An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services: using an extended technology acceptance model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 397-415, February.
    19. John Hulland & Hans Baumgartner & Keith Marion Smith, 2018. "Marketing survey research best practices: evidence and recommendations from a review of JAMS articles," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 92-108, January.
    20. Yuen, Kum Fai & Chua, Jessana & Li, Kevin X. & Wang, Xueqin, 2022. "Consumer's adoption of virtual reality technologies for marine conservation: Motivational and technology acceptance perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    21. Sun, Shanshan & Wong, Yiik Diew, 2023. "Drivers’ attention economy and adoption to autonomous vehicle," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 108-118.
    22. Chen, Xiqun (Michael) & Zheng, Hongyu & Ke, Jintao & Yang, Hai, 2020. "Dynamic optimization strategies for on-demand ride services platform: Surge pricing, commission rate, and incentives," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 23-45.
    23. Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Liu, Feng & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Consumers' paradoxical motives of co-creation: From self-service technology to crowd-sourcing platform," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    24. Bledow, Ronald & Frese, Michael & Anderson, Neil & Erez, Miriam & Farr, James, 2009. "A Dialectic Perspective on Innovation: Conflicting Demands, Multiple Pathways, and Ambidexterity," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(3), pages 305-337, September.
    25. Weiling Zhuang & Maxwell K. Hsu & Kristen L. Brewer & Qian Xiao, 2013. "Paradoxes of social networking sites: an empirical analysis," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(1), pages 33-49, January.
    26. Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Chen, Tianyi & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Co-creating consumer logistics from self-collection to crowd-sourced delivery: An examination on contextual differences in last-mile," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    27. Liu, Aiping & Urquía-Grande, Elena & López-Sánchez, Pilar & Rodríguez-López, Ángel, 2022. "How technology paradoxes and self-efficacy affect the resistance of facial recognition technology in online microfinance platforms: Evidence from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    28. Tim Gruchmann & Annika Mies & Thomas Neukirchen & Stefan Gold, 2021. "Tensions in sustainable warehousing: including the blue-collar perspective on automation and ergonomic workplace design," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 151-178, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Liu, Feng & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Consumers' paradoxical motives of co-creation: From self-service technology to crowd-sourcing platform," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    2. Aslan, Marjan & Keating, Byron W., 2025. "Providing social support in technology-based service encounters: Activating intrinsic motivations to create better outcomes," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    3. Li, Xiaolin & Zhang, Mengjie & Li, Weiwen & Chen, Juanyi, 2025. "Looking for new possibilities in emerging industries: The impact of strategic sensing capability on high-tech startups’ product innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    4. Nam, Youngwon & Lee, Sihyun & Lee, Hoyoung, 2025. "Consumer preferences for unmanned stores: A choice experiment study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Frank, Darius-Aurel & Chrysochou, Polymeros & Mitkidis, Panagiotis & Otterbring, Tobias & Ariely, Dan, 2024. "Navigating uncertainty: Exploring consumer acceptance of artificial intelligence under self-threats and high-stakes decisions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    6. Youngtak M. Kim & John R. Busenbark & Seung-Hwan Jeong & Son K. Lam, 2022. "The performance impact of marketing dualities: a response surface approach to resolving empirical challenges," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(5), pages 915-940, September.
    7. Wu, Jiangling & He, Qiang & Singh, Amit Kumar & Tian, Linjie, 2024. "What drives users to accept flying cars for urban air mobility? Findings from an empirical study," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    8. Liu, Xiaodi & Zhou, Zengze & Yuen, Kum Fai & Wang, Xueqin, 2024. "Green and gamified! An investigation of consumer participation in green last-mile from a gamification affordance perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    9. Liu, Aiping & Urquía-Grande, Elena & López-Sánchez, Pilar & Rodríguez-López, Ángel, 2022. "How technology paradoxes and self-efficacy affect the resistance of facial recognition technology in online microfinance platforms: Evidence from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    10. Elizabeth M. Caucutt & Lance Lochner & Youngmin Park, 2017. "Correlation, Consumption, Confusion, or Constraints: Why Do Poor Children Perform so Poorly?," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 119(1), pages 102-147, January.
    11. Johannes Abeler & Armin Falk & Fabian Kosse, 2021. "Malleability of Preferences for Honesty," CESifo Working Paper Series 9033, CESifo.
    12. Jinhua Xie & Gangqiao Yang & Ge Wang & Shuoyan He, 2024. "How does social capital affect farmers’ environment-friendly technology adoption behavior? A case study in Hubei Province, China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(7), pages 18361-18384, July.
    13. Mekonnen, Daniel Ayalew & Gerber, Nicolas & Matz, Julia Anna, 2018. "Gendered Social Networks, Agricultural Innovations, and Farm Productivity in Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 321-335.
    14. Syahrulanuar Ngah & Samar Rahi & Fei Long & Cecile Gabarre & Aamir Rashid & Abdul Hafaz Ngah, 2024. "Future behavioural of console gamers and mobile gamers: are they differ?," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(6), pages 5531-5557, December.
    15. Sseruyange, J. & Bulte, E., 2018. "Do Incentives matter for Knowledge Diffusion? Experimental Evidence from Uganda," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 275896, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Ryan Mullins & Raj Agnihotri, 2022. "Digital selling: organizational and managerial influences for frontline readiness and effectiveness," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 800-821, July.
    17. Fabian Kosse & Thomas Deckers & Pia Pinger & Hannah Schildberg-Hörisch & Armin Falk, 2020. "The Formation of Prosociality: Causal Evidence on the Role of Social Environment," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(2), pages 434-467.
    18. Dominik M. Wielgos & Christian Homburg & Christina Kuehnl, 2021. "Digital business capability: its impact on firm and customer performance," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 762-789, July.
    19. Michael J. Andrews, 2020. "Local Effects of Land Grant Colleges on Agricultural Innovation and Output," NBER Chapters, in: Economics of Research and Innovation in Agriculture, pages 139-175, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Bensch, Gunther & Grimm, Michael, 2024. "Behavioural constraints in energy technology uptake: Evidence from real-purchase offers in rural Rwanda and Senegal," Ruhr Economic Papers 1081, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:164:y:2025:i:c:p:206-216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.