IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v164y2025icp160-177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding key factors affecting underground logistics systems adoption and front-end planning: A cross-sectoral investigation and insights into emerging mobility solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Hu, Wanjie
  • Dong, Jianjun
  • Yang, Kai
  • Chen, Zhilong

Abstract

Recent progress in the underground logistics systems (ULS) heralds a move closer to the prospect of low-carbon automated freight movement utilizing electrified tunnels and pneumatic pipeline technologies. However, amidst the array of novel concepts, the industry's understanding of the enablers and barriers of ULS remains incomplete. This paper introduced an analytic framework for both public and private sectors to revisit the ULS plans in a nascent stage. Through a comprehensive document review, we delineate the typical approaches to initiate ULS from the perspectives of government and consortia. Fifty-four factors characterizing the sponsors' visions, project startup prerequisites, and implementation barriers were identified. We conducted semi-structured interviews and a two-round Delphi survey with 18 experts to elucidate how these factors influence ULS adoption and explore causal relationships in new system front-end planning. Subsequently, a grounded-theory framework was constructed to interrelate multi-thematic concepts. Our research findings indicate several key points: (i) the gestation of ULS project is a collaborative effort between public and private sectors looking for shared visions and common interests; (ii) the unilateral promotion of emerging transport systems/modes could face diverse barriers and disadvantages due to the complexity, uncertainties, and lack of precedents; (iii) positioning ULS programs within a public-private partnership agreement fostered by incentive policies is crucial to achieving social, technological, and business preparedness for transformation. This paper contributes to the understanding of cross-sectoral conception and arrangements of logistics modal shift from road to underground with sustainable development goals. It also offers novel insights for freight transport system adoption and policy-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Hu, Wanjie & Dong, Jianjun & Yang, Kai & Chen, Zhilong, 2025. "Understanding key factors affecting underground logistics systems adoption and front-end planning: A cross-sectoral investigation and insights into emerging mobility solutions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 160-177.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:164:y:2025:i:c:p:160-177
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.02.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25000599
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.02.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bush, Ruth E. & Bale, Catherine S.E. & Taylor, Peter G., 2016. "Realising local government visions for developing district heating: Experiences from a learning country," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 84-96.
    2. Howgego, Timothy & Roe, Michael, 1998. "The use of pipelines for the urban distribution of goods," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 61-72, April.
    3. Zhao, Jianfeng & Greenwood, David & Thurairajah, Niraj & Liu, Henry J. & Haigh, Richard, 2022. "Value for money in transport infrastructure investment: An enhanced model for better procurement decisions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 68-78.
    4. Cassetta, Ernesto & Marra, Alessandro & Pozzi, Cesare & Antonelli, Paola, 2017. "Emerging technological trajectories and new mobility solutions. A large-scale investigation on transport-related innovative start-ups and implications for policy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-11.
    5. Sciara, Gian-Claudia, 2012. "Financing congressional earmarks: Implications for transport policy and planning," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1328-1342.
    6. Rouhani, Omid M. & Geddes, R. Richard & Gao, H. Oliver & Bel, Germà, 2016. "Social welfare analysis of investment public–private partnership approaches for transportation projects," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 86-103.
    7. Elisa Villani & Luciano Greco & Nelson Phillips, 2017. "Understanding Value Creation in Public-Private Partnerships: A Comparative Case Study," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(6), pages 876-905, September.
    8. Wiegmans, Bart W. & Visser, Johan & Konings, Rob & Pielage, Ben-Jaap A., 2010. "Review of underground logistic systems in the Netherlands: an ex-post evaluation of barriers, enablers and spin-offs," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 45, pages 34-49.
    9. Meurs, Henk & Sharmeen, Fariya & Marchau, Vincent & van der Heijden, Rob, 2020. "Organizing integrated services in mobility-as-a-service systems: Principles of alliance formation applied to a MaaS-pilot in the Netherlands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 178-195.
    10. Love, Peter E.D. & Ika, Lavagnon & Matthews, Jane & Fang, Weili, 2021. "Shared leadership, value and risks in large scale transport projects: Re-calibrating procurement policy for post COVID-19," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    11. Kayikci, Yasanur & Kabadurmus, Ozgur, 2022. "Barriers to the adoption of the mobility-as-a-service concept: The case of Istanbul, a large emerging metropolis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 219-236.
    12. Terrien, Clara & Maniak, Rémi & Chen, Bo & Shaheen, Susan, 2016. "Good Practices for Advancing Urban Mobility Innovation: A Case Study of One-Way Carsharing," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt53z3h2gt, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    13. Rong Cheng & Yu Jiang & Otto Anker Nielsen, 2023. "Integrated people-and-goods transportation systems: from a literature review to a general framework for future research," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 997-1020, September.
    14. Jeon, Christy Mihyeon & Amekudzi, Adjo A. & Guensler, Randall L., 2013. "Sustainability assessment at the transportation planning level: Performance measures and indexes," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 10-21.
    15. Clara Terrien & Rémi Maniak & Bo Chen & Susan Shaheen, 2016. "Good practices for advancing urban mobility innovation: A case study of one-way carsharing," Post-Print hal-02458822, HAL.
    16. Marletto, Gerardo, 2019. "Who will drive the transition to self-driving? A socio-technical analysis of the future impact of automated vehicles," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 221-234.
    17. Hu, Wanjie & Dong, Jianjun & Hwang, Bon-Gang & Ren, Rui & Chen, Zhilong, 2022. "Is mass rapid transit applicable for deep integration of freight-passenger transport? A multi-perspective analysis from urban China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 490-510.
    18. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2000. "Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 404-428, August.
    19. Egbunike, Obiajulu N. & Potter, Andrew T., 2011. "Are freight pipelines a pipe dream? A critical review of the UK and European perspective," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 499-508.
    20. Carter, William & Pezeshkan, Amir, 2023. "The complexity of entrepreneurial ecosystem evolution and new venture policy: The case of the U.S. commercial space ecosystem," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    21. Auvinen, Heidi & Ruutu, Sampsa & Tuominen, Anu & Ahlqvist, Toni & Oksanen, Juha, 2015. "Process supporting strategic decision-making in systemic transitions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 97-114.
    22. Gandhi, Nevil & Kant, Ravi & Thakkar, Jitesh J., 2024. "Evaluation of benefits due to adoption of enablers of unimodal road to intermodal railroad freight transportation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 295-311.
    23. Bruzzone, Francesco & Cavallaro, Federico & Nocera, Silvio, 2021. "The integration of passenger and freight transport for first-last mile operations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 31-48.
    24. Bert Vernimmen & Wout Dullaert & Erik Geens & Theo Notteboom & Bob T'Jollyn & Walter Van Gilsen & Willy Winkelmans, 2007. "Underground Logistics Systems: A Way to Cope with Growing Internal Container Traffic in the Port of Antwerp?," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 391-416, May.
    25. Sears, Sean & Moataz, Mohamed & Ferguson, Mark & Razavi, Saiedeh & Páez, Antonio, 2022. "Perceived barriers to the movement of goods in Canada: A grounded theory investigation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 27-45.
    26. Zhu, Shengda & Bell, Michael G.H. & Schulz, Veronica & Stokoe, Michael, 2023. "Co-modality in city logistics: Sounds good, but how?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    27. Mazzucato, Mariana & Robinson, Douglas K.R., 2018. "Co-creating and directing Innovation Ecosystems? NASA's changing approach to public-private partnerships in low-earth orbit," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 166-177.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hu, Wanjie & Dong, Jianjun & Hwang, Bon-Gang & Ren, Rui & Chen, Zhilong, 2022. "Is mass rapid transit applicable for deep integration of freight-passenger transport? A multi-perspective analysis from urban China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 490-510.
    2. Han Zhang & Yongbo Lv & Jianwei Guo, 2022. "New Development Direction of Underground Logistics from the Perspective of Public Transport: A Systematic Review Based on Scientometrics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-31, March.
    3. Akse, Ruben & Veeneman, Wijnand & Marchau, Vincent & Ritter, Simone, 2023. "Governance of uncertainty in implementing mobility innovations: A comparison of two Dutch cases," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. Jianjun Dong & Yuanxian Xu & Bon-gang Hwang & Rui Ren & Zhilong Chen, 2019. "The Impact of Underground Logistics System on Urban Sustainable Development: A System Dynamics Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Ringsberg, Henrik, 2023. "Sustainable FLM transport based on IPF transport by ferry in coastal rural areas: A case from Sweden," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    6. Perboli, Guido & Ferrero, Francesco & Musso, Stefano & Vesco, Andrea, 2018. "Business models and tariff simulation in car-sharing services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 32-48.
    7. Cui, Shaohua & Yang, Ying & Gao, Kun & Cui, Heqi & Najafi, Arsalan, 2024. "Integration of UAVs with public transit for delivery: Quantifying system benefits and policy implications," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    8. Mark A. Moore & Aidan R. Vining, 2023. "PPP performance evaluation: the social welfare goal, principal–agent theory and political economy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(2), pages 267-299, June.
    9. Wanjie Hu & Jianjun Dong & Bon-gang Hwang & Rui Ren & Zhilong Chen, 2019. "A Scientometrics Review on City Logistics Literature: Research Trends, Advanced Theory and Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, May.
    10. Leminen, Seppo & Rajahonka, Mervi & Wendelin, Robert & Westerlund, Mika & Nyström, Anna-Greta, 2022. "Autonomous vehicle solutions and their digital servitization business models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    11. Shokoohyar, Sina & Sobhani, Ahmad & Sobhani, Anae, 2020. "Impacts of trip characteristics and weather condition on ride-sourcing network: Evidence from Uber and Lyft," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    12. Karaca, Ferhat & Camci, Fatih & Raven, Paul Graham, 2013. "City blood: A visionary infrastructure solution for household energy provision through water distribution networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 98-107.
    13. Turienzo, Javier & Cabanelas, Pablo & Lampón, Jesús F., 2023. "Business models in times of disruption: The connected and autonomous vehicles (uncertain) domino effect," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    14. Yang, Tiannuo & Chu, Zhongzhu & Wang, Bailin, 2023. "Feasibility on the integration of passenger and freight transportation in rural areas: A service mode and an optimization model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    15. Beibei Hu & Yue Sun & Huijun Sun & Xianlei Dong, 2020. "A Contrastive Study on Travel Costs of Car-Sharing and Taxis Based on GPS Trajectory Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-28, December.
    16. Ann Kathrin Stinder & Nora Schelte & Semih Severengiz, 2022. "Application of Mixed Methods in Transdisciplinary Research Projects on Sustainable Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-25, June.
    17. Zhen Di & Hanqi Zuo & Housheng Zhou & Jianguo Qi & Shenghu Zhang, 2025. "Integrated Optimization of Train Schedules and Transportation Plans for a Passenger–Freight Metro Line," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-18, January.
    18. Jingjing Jia & Shujie Ma & Yixi Xue & Deyang Kong, 2020. "Life-Cycle Break-Even Analysis of Electric Carsharing: A Comparative Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-29, August.
    19. Pandza, Krsto & Ellwood, Paul, 2013. "Strategic and ethical foundations for responsible innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 1112-1125.
    20. Aaltonen, Aleksi Ville & Alaimo, Cristina & Kallinikos, Jannis, 2021. "The making of data commodities: data analytics as an embedded process," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110296, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:164:y:2025:i:c:p:160-177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.