IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v200y2024ics0040162523008557.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing digital transformation paths for industrial clusters: Insights from a simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Teng, Yuanyang
  • Zheng, Jianzhuang
  • Li, Yicun
  • Wu, Dong

Abstract

Digital technologies have revolutionised industrial clusters, implementing digital transformation without careful consideration can lead to higher risks and ineffective investments. However, the existing research often focuses on enterprises in a specific position, whereas the entire supply chain or end-to-end research is rarely conducted. To fill this gap, this study proposes a sectoral innovation system. It conducts a simulation model to study the digital transformation process by considering the behaviour, knowledge learning, and innovation of upstream and downstream enterprises in different cluster types. The simulation dynamically presents production and productivity changes during the transformation process of the entire industrial cluster. The results reveal that an orderly transformation path is the most effective for Marshallian clusters, whereas a simultaneous transformation works best for central satellite clusters. In addition, the social network simulation before and after the digital transformation of the two industrial clusters shows that enterprises in central-satellite clusters communicate more frequently during digital transformation, which is ultimately conducive to a better performance of the digital transformation of industrial clusters. These findings emphasise the need for tailored digital transformation strategies based on cluster type to maximise benefits, underscoring the importance of leading firms in industrial clusters. It also guides the government's industrial policy formulation and management enlightenment regarding the digital transformation of enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Teng, Yuanyang & Zheng, Jianzhuang & Li, Yicun & Wu, Dong, 2024. "Optimizing digital transformation paths for industrial clusters: Insights from a simulation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:200:y:2024:i:c:s0040162523008557
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162523008557
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123170?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malerba, Franco, 2002. "Sectoral systems of innovation and production," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 247-264, February.
    2. Jensen, Morten Berg & Johnson, Bjorn & Lorenz, Edward & Lundvall, Bengt Ake, 2007. "Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 680-693, June.
    3. Paul M.A. Baker & Helaina Gaspard & Jerry A. Zhu, 2021. "Industry 4.0/Digitalization and networks of innovation in the North American regional context," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(9), pages 1708-1722, September.
    4. Lee, Keun & Lim, Chaisung, 2001. "Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging: findings from the Korean industries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 459-483, March.
    5. Franco Malerba, 2005. "Sectoral systems of innovation: a framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1-2), pages 63-82.
    6. Maskell, Peter, 2001. "Towards a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Geographical Cluster," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 10(4), pages 921-943, December.
    7. Ann Markusen, 1996. "Sticky Places in Slippery Space: A Typology of Industrial Districts," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(3), pages 293-313, July.
    8. Yang, Miying & Fu, Mingtao & Zhang, Zihan, 2021. "The adoption of digital technologies in supply chains: Drivers, process and impact," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    9. Akira Takeishi, 2002. "Knowledge Partitioning in the Interfirm Division of Labor: The Case of Automotive Product Development," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 321-338, June.
    10. Landini, Fabio & Lee, Keun & Malerba, Franco, 2017. "A history-friendly model of the successive changes in industrial leadership and the catch-up by latecomers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 431-446.
    11. Akter, Shahriar & Wamba, Samuel Fosso & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Dubey, Rameshwar & Childe, Stephen J., 2016. "How to improve firm performance using big data analytics capability and business strategy alignment?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 113-131.
    12. Keun Lee & Jonghoon Park & Minho Yoon, 2017. "Industry dynamics with diversity in firms’ catch-up strategies and demand conditions: a simulation approach," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(8), pages 755-778, November.
    13. Franco Malerba & Richard Nelson & Luigi Orsenigo & Sidney Winter, 2007. "Demand, innovation, and the dynamics of market structure: The role of experimental users and diverse preferences," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 371-399, August.
    14. Siachou, Evangelia & Vrontis, Demetris & Trichina, Eleni, 2021. "Can traditional organizations be digitally transformed by themselves? The moderating role of absorptive capacity and strategic interdependence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 408-421.
    15. David J. TEECE, 2008. "TRANSACTIONS COST ECONOMICS AND THE MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISE: An Assessment," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: The Transfer And Licensing Of Know-How And Intellectual Property Understanding the Multinational Enterprise in the Modern World, chapter 20, pages 427-451, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    16. Bresciani, Stefano & Ferraris, Alberto & Del Giudice, Manlio, 2018. "The management of organizational ambidexterity through alliances in a new context of analysis: Internet of Things (IoT) smart city projects," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 331-338.
    17. Anna Bergek & Ksenia Onufrey, 2014. "Is one path enough? Multiple paths and path interaction as an extension of path dependency theory," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 23(5), pages 1261-1297.
    18. Yoon-Zi Kim & Keun Lee, 2008. "Sectoral Innovation System and a Technological Catch-up: The Case of the Capital Goods Industry in Korea," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 135-155.
    19. Daitian Li & Zheng Liang & Fredrik Tell & Lan Xue, 2021. "Sectoral systems of innovation in the era of the fourth industrial revolution: an introduction to the special section [The magnitude of innovation by demand in a sectoral system: the role of indust," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(1), pages 123-135.
    20. Di Ye & Linlin Zheng & Peixu He, 2021. "Industry Cluster Innovation Upgrading and Knowledge Evolution: A Simulation Analysis Based on Small-World Networks," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    21. Keun Lee & Xudong Gao & Xibao Li, 2017. "Industrial catch-up in China: a sectoral systems of innovation perspective," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 10(1), pages 59-76.
    22. Fabio Landini & Rasmus Lema & Franco Malerba, 2020. "Demand-led catch-up: a history-friendly model of latecomer development in the global green economy," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(5), pages 1297-1318.
    23. Gianluca Capone & Franco Malerba & Richard R. Nelson & Luigi Orsenigo & Sidney G. Winter, 2019. "History friendly models: retrospective and future perspectives," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, March.
    24. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & Alireza Abdollahi & Suhaiza Zailani & Mohammad Iranmanesh & Morteza Ghobakhloo, 2021. "Digitalization in Food Supply Chains: A Bibliometric Review and Key-Route Main Path Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-29, December.
    25. Ron Adner & Rahul Kapoor, 2010. "Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 306-333, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabriel Gomes Moreira & Robério José Rogério dos Santos & Victor Diogho Heuer de Carvalho & Francisco José Peixoto Rosário & Agnaldo José dos Santos, 2024. "Potential for Frugal Innovation in a Brazilian Regional System: A Study Based on a Multicriteria Approach," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peili Yu & Junguo Shi & Bert M. Sadowski & Önder Nomaler, 2020. "Catching Up in the Face of Technological Discontinuity: Exploring the Role of Demand Structure and Technological Regimes in the Transition from 2G to 3G in China," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 815-841, July.
    2. Li, Daitian & Malerba, Franco, 2024. "Technological change and the evolution of the links across sectoral systems: The case of mobile communications," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    3. Lee, Keun & Malerba, Franco, 2017. "Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership:Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 338-351.
    4. Strupeit, Lars, 2017. "An innovation system perspective on the drivers of soft cost reduction for photovoltaic deployment: The case of Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 273-286.
    5. Yuanyang Teng & Yicun Li & Xiaobo Wu, 2024. "Exploring the mechanism of path-creating strategy for latecomers: a combined approach of econometrics and causal machine learning," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Li, Daitian & Capone, Gianluca & Malerba, Franco, 2019. "The long march to catch-up: A history-friendly model of China’s mobile communications industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 649-664.
    7. Zahedi Rad, Vahid & Seifi, Abbas & Fadai, Dawud, 2023. "Policy design for transition from imitation to innovation in emerging photovoltaic sectors using a system dynamics model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    8. Gianluca Capone & Franco Malerba & Richard R. Nelson & Luigi Orsenigo & Sidney G. Winter, 2019. "History friendly models: retrospective and future perspectives," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Muscio, Alessandro & Nardone, Gianluca & Stasi, Antonio, 2012. "Perceived Technological Regimes: An Empirical Analysis of the Apulian Wine Industry," 2012 International European Forum, February 13-17, 2012, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 144969, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    10. Labarthe, Pierre & Coléno, François & Enjalbert, Jérôme & Fugeray-Scarbel, Aline & Hannachi, Mourad & Lemarié, Stéphane, 2021. "Exploration, exploitation and environmental innovation in agriculture. The case of variety mixture in France and Denmark," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    11. Rakas, Marija & Hain, Daniel S., 2019. "The state of innovation system research: What happens beneath the surface?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    12. Rikap, Cecilia, 2022. "Becoming an intellectual monopoly by relying on the national innovation system: the State Grid Corporation of China's experience," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(4).
    13. Jorge Niosi, 2010. "Building National and Regional Innovation Systems," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14006.
    14. Binz, Christian & Truffer, Bernhard, 2017. "Global Innovation Systems—A conceptual framework for innovation dynamics in transnational contexts," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(7), pages 1284-1298.
    15. Rodríguez, Alicia & Hernández, Virginia & Nieto, María Jesús, 2022. "International and domestic external knowledge in the innovation performance of firms from transition economies: The role of institutions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    16. Chen, Shin-Horng & Wen, Pei-Chang, 2016. "Post Catch-up with Market Cultivation and Product Servicizing: Case of Taiwan's Transportation Equipment Industries," AGI Working Paper Series 2016-16, Asian Growth Research Institute.
    17. Minaee, Mohammadreza & Elahi, Shaban & Majidpour, Mehdi & Manteghi, Manoochehr, 2021. "Lessons learned from an unsuccessful “catching-up” in the automobile industry of Iran," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    18. Dahesh, Mehran Badin & Tabarsa, Gholamali & Zandieh, Mostafa & Hamidizadeh, Mohammadreza, 2020. "Reviewing the intellectual structure and evolution of the innovation systems approach: A social network analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    19. Chao Bi & Jingjing Zeng & Wanli Zhang & Yonglin Wen, 2020. "Modelling the Coevolution of the Fuel Ethanol Industry, Technology System, and Market System in China: A History-Friendly Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-26, February.
    20. Zhongji Yang & Liangqun Qi & Xin Li & Tianxi Wang, 2022. "How Does Successful Catch-Up Occur in Complex Products and Systems from the Innovation Ecosystem Perspective? A Case of China’s High-Speed Railway," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:200:y:2024:i:c:s0040162523008557. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.