IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceco/v107y2023ics2214804323001039.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The income inequality trap: When redistributive preferences do not correct greater inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Bernasconi, Michele
  • Neunhoeffer, Frieder

Abstract

In a lab study, we examine how preferences for redistribution are affected by income inequality, uncertainty of income class, income mobility, and the source of income (random or effort based). Under income class uncertainty we discover an inequality trap where individuals exposed to a more unequal pre-tax distribution also demonstrate greater acceptance of post-tax inequality. This effect is particularly pronounced in the effort condition and with low mobility. However, as individuals become aware of their true economic positions, the conflict between the poor and the rich intensifies, decreasing tolerance for inequality. These findings indicate that traditional rational-expectations models which solely rely on risk aversion and inequality aversion cannot fully explain subjects’ redistributive preferences. We also consider other factors, such as fairness considerations, social class memberships, and overconfidence in income expectations as potential drivers.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernasconi, Michele & Neunhoeffer, Frieder, 2023. "The income inequality trap: When redistributive preferences do not correct greater inequality," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:107:y:2023:i:c:s2214804323001039
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2023.102077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214804323001039
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socec.2023.102077?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Uncertainty; Overconfidence; Income inequality; Social mobility;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution
    • D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
    • C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:107:y:2023:i:c:s2214804323001039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620175 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.