IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/riibaf/v76y2025ics0275531925000583.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reversal of divergent decisions: Wise or hasty decisions?

Author

Listed:
  • Andreu, Laura
  • Gimeno, Ruth
  • Sarto, José Luis
  • Serrano, Miguel

Abstract

We examine whether the reversals of buying decisions by fund managers depend on the performance of the stocks; or do they depend on the divergence in the trading decisions of peer managers. Through separate analyses, we find that stock performance positively influences the reversal of trading decisions while the level of divergence has a negative effect. However, when we analyse the joint effect of performance and divergence, we find a more rapid reversal in more divergent decisions that lead to good results. This asymmetric evidence might be linked to the disposition effect and could entail the loss of potential good outcomes. The results indicate that managers who reverse their buying decisions take greater advantage of the potential performance, providing evidence of skill in their selling decisions. Finally, we observe that team structures mitigate the preference of managers to hold on to their special bets.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreu, Laura & Gimeno, Ruth & Sarto, José Luis & Serrano, Miguel, 2025. "Reversal of divergent decisions: Wise or hasty decisions?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:76:y:2025:i:c:s0275531925000583
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531925000583
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.102802?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Disposition effect; Mutual funds; Performance consequences; Reversal decisions; Trading divergence;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:76:y:2025:i:c:s0275531925000583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ribaf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.