IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v98y2025ics1059056025000255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial spillover effects of environmental regulation on ecological industrialization: Evidence from the upper reaches of the Yangtze River

Author

Listed:
  • Xie, Wangying
  • Qing, Yun
  • Tao, Lixia
  • Li, Wenyu
  • Wen, Chuanhao

Abstract

In the context of China's ecological civilization initiative, understanding the spatial spillover effects of environmental regulation on ecological industrialization in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River is essential for fostering a synergistic relationship between environmental regulation and industrial development. This synergy promotes the supply of high-quality ecological products and supports the transformation of “lucid waters and lush mountains” into “gold and silver mountains.” Drawing on data from 47 cities in the region between 2005 and 2022, this study employs the global Moran's I index, local Moran's I scatter plots, the spatial Durbin model, and spatial effect decomposition methods to explore these spillover effects. The results show that command-and-control, market-based, and public participation environmental regulations all exhibit significant spatial spillover effects on ecological industrialization. Threshold effect tests further reveal that the impact of environmental regulation on ecological industrialization varies according to per capita GDP levels. Mechanism analysis highlights green technological innovation as a key driver of the positive effects of environmental regulation on ecological industrialization. These findings provide novel theoretical insights into the spatial effects and mechanisms underlying the interaction between environmental regulation and ecological industrialization.

Suggested Citation

  • Xie, Wangying & Qing, Yun & Tao, Lixia & Li, Wenyu & Wen, Chuanhao, 2025. "Spatial spillover effects of environmental regulation on ecological industrialization: Evidence from the upper reaches of the Yangtze River," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:98:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025000255
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2025.103862
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056025000255
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2025.103862?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gillian Bristow & Peter Wells, 2005. "Innovative discourse for sustainable local development: a critical analysis of eco-industrialism," International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1/2), pages 168-179.
    2. Wenjing Li & Chuanmin Shuai & Yu Shuai & Xin Cheng & Yue Liu & Fubin Huang, 2020. "How Livelihood Assets Contribute to Sustainable Development of Smallholder Farmers," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 408-429, April.
    3. Paul Lanoie & Michel Patry & Richard Lajeunesse, 2008. "Environmental regulation and productivity: testing the porter hypothesis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 121-128, October.
    4. de Groot, Rudolf S. & Wilson, Matthew A. & Boumans, Roelof M. J., 2002. "A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 393-408, June.
    5. Dahlman, Carl J, 1979. "The Problem of Externality," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(1), pages 141-162, April.
    6. Eli Berman & Linda T. M. Bui, 2001. "Environmental Regulation And Productivity: Evidence From Oil Refineries," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 83(3), pages 498-510, August.
    7. Dale W. Jorgenson & Peter J. Wilcoxen, 1990. "Environmental Regulation and U.S. Economic Growth," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 21(2), pages 314-340, Summer.
    8. George van Leeuwen & Pierre Mohnen, 2017. "Revisiting the Porter hypothesis: an empirical analysis of Green innovation for the Netherlands," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1-2), pages 63-77, February.
    9. Paul Lanoie & Jérémy Laurent‐Lucchetti & Nick Johnstone & Stefan Ambec, 2011. "Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 803-842, September.
    10. Adam B. Jaffe & Karen Palmer, 1997. "Environmental Regulation And Innovation: A Panel Data Study," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 79(4), pages 610-619, November.
    11. Morgenstern, Richard D. & Pizer, William A. & Shih, Jhih-Shyang, 2002. "Jobs Versus the Environment: An Industry-Level Perspective," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 412-436, May.
    12. Sang-Ho Lee & Chul-Hi Park, 2011. "Environmental Regulations on Vertical Oligopolies with Eco-Industry," Korean Economic Review, Korean Economic Association, vol. 27, pages 311-327.
    13. Andrea Fabrizi & Marco Gentile & Giulio Guarini & Valentina Meliciani, 2024. "The impact of environmental regulation on innovation and international competitiveness," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 169-204, January.
    14. Han, Xinyu & Cai, Qihua, 2024. "Environmental regulation, green credit, and corporate environmental investment," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(3).
    15. Yanli Ji & Jie Xue & Kaiyang Zhong, 2022. "Does Environmental Regulation Promote Industrial Green Technology Progress? Empirical Evidence from China with a Heterogeneity Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-23, January.
    16. Ziyi Zhao & Kangning Xiong & Bin Ying & Rong Zhao & Jiawang Yan & Huiqiong Huang, 2024. "A Review of Eco-Product Value Realization and Eco-Industry with Enlightenment toward Village Ecosystem Service in the Karst Desertification Control," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-34, May.
    17. Turner, R. Kerry & van den Bergh, Jeroen C. J. M. & Soderqvist, Tore & Barendregt, Aat & van der Straaten, Jan & Maltby, Edward & van Ierland, Ekko C., 2000. "Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 7-23, October.
    18. Li, Jianglong & Gao, Jinfeng & Liao, Meiling, 2024. "Operating risk of enterprises when adopting environmental regulation: Evidence from environmental protection law in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 901-914.
    19. List, John A. & McHone, W. Warren & Millimet, Daniel L., 2004. "Effects of environmental regulation on foreign and domestic plant births: is there a home field advantage?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 303-326, September.
    20. Yonghua Li & Huarong Wang & Chunju Liu & Jianhua Sun & Qinchuan Ran, 2024. "Optimizing the Valuation and Implementation Path of the Gross Ecosystem Product: A Case Study of Tonglu County, Hangzhou City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-24, February.
    21. Qingzi Huang & Dongdong Li, 2024. "Pressures and responses to stationary waste gas emissions: evaluation of a moderated chain mediating model using Chinese empirical data," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 7255-7283, March.
    22. Huilan Wei & Yanlong Wang & Chendan Yang & Peiyao Yu, 2024. "Empirical Analysis of the Role of Digital Agriculture in Enabling Coordinated Development of Ecosystem Services and Human Well-Being: Evidence from Provincial Panel Data in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-34, November.
    23. Tao He & Xiuwei Lin & Yongli Qu & Chunbo Wei, 2023. "Study on the Relationship between Economic Growth of Animal Husbandry and Carbon Emission Based on Logarithmic Average Index Method and Decoupling Model: A Case Study of Heilongjiang Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, June.
    24. Bruce Domazlicky & William Weber, 2004. "Does Environmental Protection Lead to Slower Productivity Growth in the Chemical Industry?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 28(3), pages 301-324, July.
    25. Li Song & Xiaoliang Zhou, 2021. "Does the Green Industry Policy Reduce Industrial Pollution Emissions?—Evidence from China’s National Eco-Industrial Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, June.
    26. Lihua Ma & Shiya Ma & Qisheng Tang & Mingmei Sun & Huizhe Yan & Xiuling Yuan & Wei Tian & Yufei Chen, 2024. "Environmental regulation effect on the different technology innovation-based the empirical analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(1), pages 1-32, January.
    27. Yi Ding, 2023. "The impact of agricultural industrial agglomeration on farmers’ income: An influence mechanism test based on a spatial panel model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-25, September.
    28. Khurshid, Adnan & Huang, Yupei & Cifuentes-Faura, Javier & Khan, Khalid, 2024. "Beyond borders: Assessing the transboundary effects of environmental regulation on technological development in Europe," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    29. Zhang, Zhiyuan & Li, Runfei & Song, Yang & Sahut, Jean-Michel, 2024. "The impact of environmental regulation on the optimization of industrial structure in energy-based cities," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    30. Yuling Gao & Man Cai & Xin He, 2023. "Influence of Financial Support to Agriculture on Carbon Emission Intensity of the Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-12, January.
    31. Brännlund, Runar, 2008. "Productivity and environmental regulations - A long run analysis of the Swedish industry," Umeå Economic Studies 728, Umeå University, Department of Economics.
    32. Yingli Huang & Guoyi Lou & Jiabin Yao, 2023. "Research on the Profit Contribution of Forest Ecological Benefits Based on Policy and Market-Tools Compensation Projects in Nanping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
    33. Guanghui Tian & Jianming Miao & Changhong Miao & Yehua Dennis Wei & Dongyang Yang, 2022. "Interplay of Environmental Regulation and Local Protectionism in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-21, May.
    34. Bruno, Daniel & Sorando, Ricardo & Álvarez-Farizo, Begoña & Castellano, Clara & Céspedes, Vanessa & Gallardo, Belinda & Jiménez, Juan J. & López, M. Victoria & López-Flores, Rocío & Moret-Fernández, D, 2021. "Depopulation impacts on ecosystem services in Mediterranean rural areas," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    35. J. Paul Elhorst, 2014. "Matlab Software for Spatial Panels," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 37(3), pages 389-405, July.
    36. Barbera, Anthony J. & McConnell, Virginia D., 1990. "The impact of environmental regulations on industry productivity: Direct and indirect effects," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 50-65, January.
    37. Yanhong Feng & Shuanglian Chen & Pierre Failler, 2020. "Productivity Effect Evaluation on Market-Type Environmental Regulation: A Case Study of SO 2 Emission Trading Pilot in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-27, October.
    38. Letchumanan, Raman & Kodama, Fumio, 2000. "Reconciling the conflict between the 'pollution-haven' hypothesis and an emerging trajectory of international technology transfer," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 59-79, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shang Chen & Yuanhe Du & Yeye Liu, 2025. "Regional Integration and Urban Green and Low-Carbon Development: A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on the Expansion of the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-34, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei Shan & Jingyi Wang, 2019. "The Effect of Environmental Performance on Employment: Evidence from China’s Manufacturing Industries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Nusrate Aziz & Belayet Hossain & Laura Lamb, 2022. "Does green policy pay dividends?," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 24(2), pages 147-172, April.
    3. Yang, Chih-Hai & Tseng, Yu-Hsuan & Chen, Chiang-Ping, 2012. "Environmental regulations, induced R&D, and productivity: Evidence from Taiwan's manufacturing industries," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 514-532.
    4. Albrizio, Silvia & Kozluk, Tomasz & Zipperer, Vera, 2017. "Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 209-226.
    5. Dietrich Earnhart & Dylan G. Rassier, 2016. "“Effective regulatory stringency” and firms’ profitability: the effects of effluent limits and government monitoring," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 111-145, October.
    6. Rassier, Dylan G. & Earnhart, Dietrich, 2015. "Effects of environmental regulation on actual and expected profitability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 129-140.
    7. Ferris, Ann & Garbaccio, Richard & Marten, Alex & Wolverton, Ann, 2017. "The Impacts of Environmental Regulation on the U.S. Economy," National Center for Environmental Economics-NCEE Working Papers 280936, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    8. Anabel Zárate-Marco & Jaime Vallés-Giménez, 2015. "Environmental tax and productivity in a decentralized context: new findings on the Porter hypothesis," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 313-339, October.
    9. Johan Brolund & Robert Lundmark, 2017. "Effect of Environmental Regulation Stringency on the Pulp and Paper Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Xiaoning Zhang & Mei Qu, 2020. "Impact of Environmental Regulation on Scientific and Technological Competitiveness of Resource-Based Cities in China—Based on Panel Data of 33 Resource-Based Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Kneller, Richard & Manderson, Edward, 2012. "Environmental regulations and innovation activity in UK manufacturing industries," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 211-235.
    12. Rubashkina, Yana & Galeotti, Marzio & Verdolini, Elena, 2015. "Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 288-300.
    13. Zhang, Yijun & Song, Yi, 2022. "Tax rebates, technological innovation and sustainable development: Evidence from Chinese micro-level data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    14. Stefan Ambec & Mark A. Cohen & Stewart Elgie & Paul Lanoie, 2013. "The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 7(1), pages 2-22, January.
    15. Dylan Rassier & Dietrich Earnhart, 2010. "Does the Porter Hypothesis Explain Expected Future Financial Performance? The Effect of Clean Water Regulation on Chemical Manufacturing Firms," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 45(3), pages 353-377, March.
    16. Antonietti, Roberto & Marzucchi, Alberto, 2014. "Green tangible investment strategies and export performance: A firm-level investigation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 150-161.
    17. Wang, Yan & Shen, Neng, 2016. "Environmental regulation and environmental productivity: The case of China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 758-766.
    18. Zhu, Xuehong & Zuo, Xuguang & Li, Hailing, 2021. "The dual effects of heterogeneous environmental regulation on the technological innovation of Chinese steel enterprises—Based on a high-dimensional fixed effects model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    19. Mian Yang & Yining Yuan & Fuxia Yang & Dalia Patino-Echeverri, 2021. "Effects of environmental regulation on firm entry and exit and China’s industrial productivity: a new perspective on the Porter Hypothesis," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(4), pages 915-944, October.
    20. Wang, Ailun & Hu, Shuo & Lin, Boqiang, 2021. "Can environmental regulation solve pollution problems? Theoretical model and empirical research based on the skill premium," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:98:y:2025:i:c:s1059056025000255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.