IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p2228-d1046455.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Financial Support to Agriculture on Carbon Emission Intensity of the Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Yuling Gao

    (School of Economics, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China)

  • Man Cai

    (School of Economics, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China)

  • Xin He

    (School of Economics, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China)

Abstract

Financial support to agriculture is an important means by which to support agricultural development. While promoting agricultural economic growth, it also has an influence on the agricultural production environment. In order to explore the sustainable development of the agricultural economy, based on the provincial panel data of 31 provinces in China from 2000 to 2020, this paper uses Geoda software to construct a spatial distance weight matrix and uses Stata software to establish a spatial Durbin model of random effects, and analyzes the influence of the level of financial support to agriculture on the intensity of agricultural carbon emission (ACE). The results show that the support level has a significant spatial spillover effect, and that every 1% increase in the support level will increase the carbon emission (CE) intensity of the province by 0.1357% and the CE intensity of neighboring provinces by 0.0714%. Based on this, this paper puts forward suggestions that the structure of China’s financial support to agriculture needs to be further optimized, and that it is necessary to use such support to coordinate emission reduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuling Gao & Man Cai & Xin He, 2023. "Influence of Financial Support to Agriculture on Carbon Emission Intensity of the Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-12, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2228-:d:1046455
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2228/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/2228/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Santiago Guerrero & Maho Nakagawa, 2019. "Productivity improvements and reducing GHG emission intensity in agriculture go together – up to a point," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 18(3), pages 24-25, December.
    2. Sailian Xia & Daming You & Zhihua Tang & Bo Yang, 2021. "Analysis of the Spatial Effect of Fiscal Decentralization and Environmental Decentralization on Carbon Emissions under the Pressure of Officials’ Promotion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maxwell Chukwudi Udeagha & Marthinus Christoffel Breitenbach, 2023. "The Role of Fiscal Decentralization in Limiting CO2 Emissions in South Africa," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 1-30, September.
    2. Maxwell Chukwudi Udeagha & Edwin Muchapondwa, 2023. "Environmental sustainability in South Africa: Understanding the criticality of economic policy uncertainty, fiscal decentralization, and green innovation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(3), pages 1638-1651, June.
    3. Yongming Zhu & Xiaoyu Zhou & Junjie Li & Fan Wang, 2022. "Technological Innovation, Fiscal Decentralization, Green Development Efficiency: Based on Spatial Effect and Moderating Effect," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Wei Dong & Xiaomi Hou & Guowei Qin, 2023. "Research on the Carbon Emission Reduction Effect of Green Taxation under China’s Fiscal Decentralization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Yuxin Fang & Hongjun Cao & Jihui Sun, 2022. "Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Regional Green Development under China’s Environmental Decentralization System—Based on Spatial Durbin Model and Threshold Effect," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-27, November.
    6. Maxwell Chukwudi Udeagha & Nicholas Ngepah, 2022. "Dynamic ARDL Simulations Effects of Fiscal Decentralization, Green Technological Innovation, Trade Openness, and Institutional Quality on Environmental Sustainability: Evidence from South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-35, August.
    7. Jianan Liu & Ni Dai & Yuan Sui & Asmatullah Yaqoubi, 2023. "A Study on the Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Regional Green Development: A Perspective Based on the Emphasis on Sports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Xianpu Xu & Shan Li, 2022. "Neighbor-Companion or Neighbor-Beggar? Estimating the Spatial Spillover Effects of Fiscal Decentralization on China’s Carbon Emissions Based on Spatial Econometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-26, August.
    9. Zhao Yang, 2023. "Can the Digitalization Reduce Carbon Emission Intensity?—The Moderating Effects of the Fiscal Decentralization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, June.
    10. Luiz de Mello & João Tovar Jalles, 2022. "Decentralisation and the environment: Survey-based and cross-country evidence," Working Papers REM 2022/0215, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    11. Keliang Wang & Bin Zhao & Tianzheng Fan & Jinning Zhang, 2022. "Economic Growth Targets and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-16, June.
    12. Cao, Dongqin & Peng, Can & Yang, Guanglei, 2022. "The pressure of political promotion and renewable energy technological innovation: A spatial econometric analysis from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    13. Yinuo Wang & Fengxiu Zhou & Huwei Wen, 2023. "Does Environmental Decentralization Promote Renewable Energy Development? A Local Government Competition Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    14. Doris Läpple & Colin A. Carter & Cathal Buckley, 2022. "EU milk quota abolition, dairy expansion, and greenhouse gas emissions," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(1), pages 125-142, January.
    15. Liu, Xiaojing & Yang, Jie & Bilan, Yuriy & Shahzad, Umer, 2023. "Resources curse hypothesis and COP26 target: Mineral and oil resources economies COVID-19 perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    16. Aihui Ma & Yaya He & Peng Tang, 2021. "Understanding the Impact of Land Resource Misallocation on Carbon Emissions in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    17. Hengzhou Xu & Xiaoyan Li, 2023. "Effect mechanism of Chinese-style decentralization on regional carbon emissions and policy improvement: evidence from China’s 12 urban agglomerations," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 474-505, January.
    18. Shi Chen & Xun Liu & Chong Lu, 2022. "Fiscal Decentralization, Local Government Behavior, and Macroeconomic Effects of Environmental Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Maxwell Chukwudi Udeagha & Marthinus Christoffel Breitenbach, 2023. "Revisiting the nexus between fiscal decentralization and CO2 emissions in South Africa: fresh policy insights," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-46, December.
    20. Shuhua Zhang & Jian Li & Bao Jiang & Tianmiao Guo, 2023. "Government Intervention, Structural Transformation, and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-19, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:2228-:d:1046455. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.