IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v55y2026i2s0048733325002057.html

Entrepreneurial narratives, digital community discussion, and crowdfunding success

Author

Listed:
  • Bade, Marco
  • Reichenbach, Felix

Abstract

This study examines how entrepreneurial narratives are related to crowdfunding success, both directly and indirectly, through community discussion. It draws on the Expectation Confirmation Model (ECM) to conceptualize community discussion as a potential mediator. Using a dataset of 26,996 Indiegogo campaigns and more than 3000 Reddit posts and comments, we apply structural equation modeling and sentiment analysis. We find that the intensity of entrepreneurial narratives, measured by description length and update frequency, is positively associated with both crowdfunding success and community discussion activity. However, community discussion activity, particularly when driven by promotion posts or emerging late in the campaign, is associated with reduced crowdfunding success. These findings highlight the double-edged nature of digital visibility and extend the ECM to capture cross-platform, socially distributed feedback effects. We derive practical guidance for entrepreneurs to strategically time and tailor their communication to avoid backlash and maximize crowdfunding success.

Suggested Citation

  • Bade, Marco & Reichenbach, Felix, 2026. "Entrepreneurial narratives, digital community discussion, and crowdfunding success," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:55:y:2026:i:2:s0048733325002057
    DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2025.105376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733325002057
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:55:y:2026:i:2:s0048733325002057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/respol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.