IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v54y2025i7s0048733325001003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Autonomous inventions, problem formulation, and inventive outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Jiho
  • Criscuolo, Paola
  • Sharapov, Dmitry

Abstract

Prior research on creativity by R&D teams has highlighted that autonomy in deciding how to solve a given problem (operational autonomy) positively influences creativity. However, R&D teams may also have autonomy in choosing which problems to address (strategic autonomy), the effects of which remain underexplored. This study examines how strategic autonomy influences the cognitive process of problem representation and in turn, the creativity of inventions produced by R&D teams. Leveraging a unique dataset consisting of descriptions of problems in invention disclosures by R&D professionals of a firm, along with information on whether an invention was autonomously initiated, we find that problem representation complexity is lower for autonomous inventions, or inventions for which R&D teams exert strategic autonomy to identify problems themselves, than top-down inventions for which problems are identified and assigned to them by managers. We further find that domain expertise and multi-project engagement of team members moderate this relationship, and that lower problem representation complexity in turn relates to lower creativity of inventions. By uncovering a novel mechanism through which autonomy negatively affects creativity, this study contributes to the literatures on creativity, innovation, and organizational design.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Jiho & Criscuolo, Paola & Sharapov, Dmitry, 2025. "Autonomous inventions, problem formulation, and inventive outcomes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(7).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:54:y:2025:i:7:s0048733325001003
    DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2025.105271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733325001003
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105271?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:54:y:2025:i:7:s0048733325001003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/respol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.