IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orstsc/v7y2022i4p284-299.html

Getting to the Root of Things: The Role of Epistemic Motivation and Construal Levels in Strategic Problem Formulation

Author

Listed:
  • Chan Hyung Park

    (Olin Business School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130)

  • Markus Baer

    (Olin Business School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri 63130)

Abstract

When formulating strategic problems, managers and executives routinely overlook relevant causes. This oversight, in turn, compromises the effectiveness of solutions and strategies. To illuminate the factors determining the success of problem formulation, we develop a model of the individual-level drivers of problem formulation comprehensiveness—the number of nonredundant and relevant causes to a problem that individuals identify. Specifically, we theorize that epistemic motivation—the desire to learn and hold well-informed views of the world—is an important driver of comprehensiveness. Furthermore, we suggest that high construal levels—an abstract thinking style—enhance the benefits of epistemic motivation because they direct individual information processing away from the symptoms of a problem toward its underlying causes. We test this interaction model in two experimental studies involving Chinese top executives and university students in the United States. The results of our two studies are consistent with our theoretical model. High construal levels strengthen the effect of epistemic motivation, resulting in greater comprehensiveness of problem formulation. We discuss the implications of our work for theory and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Chan Hyung Park & Markus Baer, 2022. "Getting to the Root of Things: The Role of Epistemic Motivation and Construal Levels in Strategic Problem Formulation," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 284-299, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orstsc:v:7:y:2022:i:4:p:284-299
    DOI: 10.1287/stsc.2022.0155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2022.0155
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/stsc.2022.0155?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herbert A. Simon, 1955. "A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 69(1), pages 99-118.
    2. Jan W. Rivkin & Nicolaj Siggelkow, 2003. "Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 290-311, March.
    3. Giovanni Gavetti & Daniel A. Levinthal & Jan W. Rivkin, 2005. "Strategy making in novel and complex worlds: the power of analogy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(8), pages 691-712, August.
    4. Markus Baer & Kurt T. Dirks & Jackson A. Nickerson, 2013. "Microfoundations of strategic problem formulation†," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 197-214, February.
    5. Mayseless, Ofra & Kruglanski, Arie W., 1987. "What makes you so sure? Effects of epistemic motivations on judgmental confidence," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 162-183, April.
    6. Nicolaj Siggelkow & Jan W. Rivkin, 2005. "Speed and Search: Designing Organizations for Turbulence and Complexity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 101-122, April.
    7. Daniel A. Levinthal, 1997. "Adaptation on Rugged Landscapes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(7), pages 934-950, July.
    8. Arnaldo Camuffo & Alessandro Cordova & Alfonso Gambardella & Chiara Spina, 2020. "A Scientific Approach to Entrepreneurial Decision Making: Evidence from a Randomized Control Trial," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(2), pages 564-586, February.
    9. Hazhir Rahmandad & Jerker Denrell & Drazen Prelec, 2021. "What makes dynamic strategic problems difficult? Evidence from an experimental study," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(5), pages 865-897, May.
    10. Felipe A. Csaszar & Daniel A. Levinthal, 2016. "Mental representation and the discovery of new strategies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(10), pages 2031-2049, October.
    11. Livi, Stefano & Kruglanski, Arie W. & Pierro, Antonio & Mannetti, Lucia & Kenny, David A., 2015. "Epistemic motivation and perpetuation of group culture: Effects of need for cognitive closure on trans-generational norm transmission," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 105-112.
    12. Amit, Adi & Sagiv, Lilach, 2013. "The role of epistemic motivation in individuals’ response to decision complexity," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 104-117.
    13. Marjorie A. Lyles, 1981. "Formulating strategic problems: Empirical analysis and model development," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(1), pages 61-75, January.
    14. Roger J. Volkema, 1983. "Problem Formulation in Planning and Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 639-652, June.
    15. Jackson Nickerson & Nicholas Argyres, 2018. "Strategizing Before Strategic Decision Making," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 592-605, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chan Hyung Park & Markus Baer & Jackson Nickerson, 2025. "Looking at the Trees to See the Forest: Construal Level Shift in Strategic Problem Framing and Formulation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 1962-1979, September.
    2. Akhil Bhardwaj & Anastasia Sergeeva & Joseph Mahoney & Jackson Nickerson, 2025. "Theorizing as Problem Solving: A Pragmatist Perspective on the Logic of Pursuit," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 338-359, December.
    3. Yang, Jiho & Criscuolo, Paola & Sharapov, Dmitry, 2025. "Autonomous inventions, problem formulation, and inventive outcomes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(7).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chan Hyung Park & Markus Baer & Jackson Nickerson, 2025. "Looking at the Trees to See the Forest: Construal Level Shift in Strategic Problem Framing and Formulation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 1962-1979, September.
    2. Oliver Baumann & Nicolaj Siggelkow, 2013. "Dealing with Complexity: Integrated vs. Chunky Search Processes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 116-132, February.
    3. Friederike Wall, 2016. "Agent-based modeling in managerial science: an illustrative survey and study," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 135-193, January.
    4. Felipe A. Csaszar & Harsh Ketkar & Hyunjin Kim, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence and Strategic Decision-Making: Evidence from Entrepreneurs and Investors," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 322-345, December.
    5. Oliver Baumann, 2015. "Models of complex adaptive systems in strategy and organization research," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 14(2), pages 169-183, November.
    6. Daniel A. Levinthal & Maciej Workiewicz, 2018. "When Two Bosses Are Better Than One: Nearly Decomposable Systems and Organizational Adaptation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(2), pages 207-224, April.
    7. Chan Hyung Park, 2024. "Finding a road less traveled: Combining analysis and intuition to develop novel problem formulations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(11), pages 2368-2392, November.
    8. Stephan Billinger & Kannan Srikanth & Nils Stieglitz & Terry R. Schumacher, 2021. "Exploration and exploitation in complex search tasks: How feedback influences whether and where human agents search," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 361-385, February.
    9. Michael J. Leiblein & Jeffrey J. Reuer & Todd Zenger, 2018. "What Makes a Decision Strategic?," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 558-573, December.
    10. Cha Li & Felipe A. Csaszar, 2019. "Government as Landscape Designer: A Behavioral View of Industrial Policy," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(3), pages 175-192, September.
    11. Olav Sorenson, 2024. "Theory, Search, and Learning," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 372-381, December.
    12. Thorbjørn Knudsen & Daniel A. Levinthal, 2007. "Two Faces of Search: Alternative Generation and Alternative Evaluation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 39-54, February.
    13. Phanish Puranam & Murali Swamy, 2016. "How Initial Representations Shape Coupled Learning Processes," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 323-335, April.
    14. Juha Uotila, 2018. "Punctuated equilibrium or ambidexterity: dynamics of incremental and radical organizational change over time," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(1), pages 131-148.
    15. Sasanka Sekhar Chanda & Sougata Ray, 2025. "Is comprehensiveness in making strategic decisions always helpful?," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 50(4), pages 1011-1036, November.
    16. Daniella Laureiro-Martinez & Jose Pablo Arrieta & Stefano Brusoni, 2023. "Microfoundations of Problem Solving: Attentional Engagement Predicts Problem-Solving Strategies," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 2207-2230, November.
    17. Felipe A. Csaszar & Nicole Hinrichs & Mana Heshmati, 2024. "External representations in strategic decision‐making: Understanding strategy's reliance on visuals," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(11), pages 2191-2226, November.
    18. Sai Yayavaram & Sasanka Sekhar Chanda, 2023. "Decision making under high complexity: a computational model for the science of muddling through," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 300-335, June.
    19. Helmut M. Dietl & Markus Lang & Eric Lucas & Dirk Martignoni, 2012. "Learning Through Inaccurate Replication," Working Papers 312, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
    20. Felipe A. Csaszar, 2018. "A note on how NK landscapes work," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 7(1), pages 1-6, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orstsc:v:7:y:2022:i:4:p:284-299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.