IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/respol/v54y2025i6s0048733325000836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Offline vs. Online interactions: The effects on scientific research

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Yichuan
  • Leng, Xuan
  • Zhu, Tianyun

Abstract

Does digital technology lead to the death of distance? In this paper, we explore this question through the lens of scientific innovation in universities. To assess the impact of online and offline communication on the quantity and quality of scientific research, we employ the difference-in-differences approach, using two types of exogenous shocks—the adoption of Broadband China and the opening of urban subway system—as proxy for improvements in online and offline communication respectively. By analyzing these two treatments within a unified framework, we find that both online and offline communication can enhance the quantity of scientific research in universities. Meanwhile, online communication cannot improve the quality of scientific research, whereas offline communication can significantly boost the publications in top-tier journals. In terms of the underlying mechanism, we find that the increase in research quantity is mainly driven by increased collaboration, and the improvement in research quality results from reduced execution costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Yichuan & Leng, Xuan & Zhu, Tianyun, 2025. "Offline vs. Online interactions: The effects on scientific research," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(6).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:54:y:2025:i:6:s0048733325000836
    DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2025.105254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733325000836
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105254?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:respol:v:54:y:2025:i:6:s0048733325000836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/respol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.