IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reecon/v79y2025i4s1090944325000572.html

Rethinking tobacco policy: Why a Cap-and-Levy scheme can outperform the UK’s sales ban

Author

Listed:
  • Madia, Joan E.

Abstract

The United Kingdom aims to be smoke-free by 2030, and in pursuit of this goal, has proposed a Generational Sales Ban (GSB). While somewhat innovative, the GSB exclusively targets future generations, potentially overlooking the immediate health burdens and illicit market risks associated with current smokers. This study argues for a Cap-and-Levy scheme as a more comprehensive and efficient alternative. By directly addressing supply, consumption, and state tax revenues, a Cap-and-Levy approach offers a broader impact on smoking prevalence including existing smokers, while potentially mitigating the unintended consequences of a sales ban, such as fuelling the illicit trade and reducing tax revenues. This analysis suggests that a Cap-and-Levy mechanism warrants consideration as a policy instrument that could outperform the GSB in achieving significant and immediate reductions in smoking-related harm, without the unintended consequences that the GSB would produce.

Suggested Citation

  • Madia, Joan E., 2025. "Rethinking tobacco policy: Why a Cap-and-Levy scheme can outperform the UK’s sales ban," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(4).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reecon:v:79:y:2025:i:4:s1090944325000572
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rie.2025.101084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090944325000572
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rie.2025.101084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oecd, 2018. "Designing Publicly Funded Healthcare Markets," OECD Roundtables on Competition Policy Papers 223, OECD Publishing.
    2. UNCTAD & World Bank, 2018. "Healthy and Safe Working Environment," World Bank Publications - Reports 29475, The World Bank Group.
    3. Michael R. Pakko, 2006. "On the economic analysis of smoking bans," Regional Economic Development, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue Oct, pages 115-130.
    4. Orenstein, Daniel G JD, MPH & Glantz, Stanton A PhD, 2018. "Public Health Language for Recreational Cannabis Laws," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt05d5g5db, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    5. Cotti, Chad & DeCicca, Philip & Nesson, Erik, 2024. "The effects of tobacco 21 laws on smoking and vaping: Evidence from panel data and biomarkers," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    6. William B.P. Robson, 2018. "Healthcare Costs in Canada: Stopping Bad News Getting Worse," e-briefs 275, C.D. Howe Institute.
    7. Barrie Craven & Michael L. Marlow, 2008. "Economic Effects Of Smoking Bans On Restaurants And Pubs," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 57-61, December.
    8. Karim W. F. Youssef, 2018. "The built environment and public health," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 121-122, January.
    9. Jérôme Adda & Francesca Cornaglia, 2010. "The Effect of Bans and Taxes on Passive Smoking," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 2(1), pages 1-32, January.
    10. Adriana Gabriela ALEXANDRU & Irina Miruna RADU & Madalina - Lavinia BIZON, 2018. "Big Data in Healthcare - Opportunities and Challenges," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(2), pages 43-54.
    11. World Health Organization & World Bank Group & OECD, 2018. "Delivering Quality Health Services," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 29970, April.
    12. Jérôme Adda & Francesca Cornaglia, 2010. "Passive smoking: the effect of bans and taxes," CentrePiece - The magazine for economic performance 315, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    13. Che, Yi & Li, Xin, 2018. "Retirement and health: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 84-95.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee Worden & Rae Wannier & Nicole A Hoff & Kamy Musene & Bernice Selo & Mathias Mossoko & Emile Okitolonda-Wemakoy & Jean Jacques Muyembe Tamfum & George W Rutherford & Thomas M Lietman & Anne W Rimoi, 2019. "Projections of epidemic transmission and estimation of vaccination impact during an ongoing Ebola virus disease outbreak in Northeastern Democratic Republic of Congo, as of Feb. 25, 2019," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Wittmer, Josie, 2021. "“We live and we do this work”: Women waste pickers’ experiences of wellbeing in Ahmedabad, India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    3. Fanzo, Jessica & Haddad, Lawrence & Schneider, Kate R. & Béné, Christophe & Covic, Namukolo M. & Guarin, Alejandro & Herforth, Anna W. & Herrero, Mario & Sumaila, U. Rashid & Aburto, Nancy J. & Amuyun, 2021. "Viewpoint: Rigorous monitoring is necessary to guide food system transformation in the countdown to the 2030 global goals," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    4. Leah K. Lakdawala & David Simon, 2017. "The Intergenerational Consequences of Tobacco Policy: A Review of Policy's Influence on Maternal Smoking and Child Health," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 84(1), pages 229-274, July.
    5. Jang, Soomin & Kim, Dongyoung, 2026. "Consistency of perception of tobacco use: Evidence from a biomarker," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 388(C).
    6. Peters, Luke & MacKenzie, Don, 2019. "The death and rebirth of bikesharing in Seattle: Implications for policy and system design," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 208-226.
    7. Kim, Dohyung & Yörük, Barış K., 2015. "The impact of restaurant smoking bans on dining out expenditures: Evidence from panel data," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 38-49.
    8. Chin, Marshall H. & King, Paula T. & Jones, Rhys G. & Jones, Bryn & Ameratunga, Shanthi N. & Muramatsu, Naoko & Derrett, Sarah, 2018. "Lessons for achieving health equity comparing Aotearoa/New Zealand and the United States," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(8), pages 837-853.
    9. Annette Hofmann & Martin Nell, 2012. "Smoking bans and the secondhand smoking problem: an economic analysis," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 13(3), pages 227-236, June.
    10. Abel Brodeur, 2012. "Smoking, Income and Subjective Well-Being: Evidence from Smoking Bans," Working Papers halshs-00664269, HAL.
    11. Aline Bütikofer & René Karadakic & Kjell G. Salvanes, 2021. "Income Inequality and Mortality: A Norwegian Perspective," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(1), pages 193-221, March.
    12. Esteban Petruzzello, 2019. "Measuring the Effect of Policy on the Demand for Menthol Cigarettes: Evidence from Household-Level Purchase Data," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 45(3), pages 422-445, June.
    13. repec:ejw:journl:v:15:y:2018:i:2:p:129-157 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Daniel Kuehnle & Christoph Wunder, 2017. "The Effects of Smoking Bans on Self‐Assessed Health: Evidence from Germany," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 321-337, March.
    15. Sungtak Hong & Kanishka Misra, 2023. "The impact of commodity taxation on product variety: a multi-category investigation," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 591-604, December.
    16. Cornelia Chadi, 2022. "Smoking Bans, Leisure Time and Subjective Well-being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 3765-3797, December.
    17. Kai‐Wen Cheng & Feng Liu & MariaElena Gonzalez & Stanton Glantz, 2017. "The Effects of Workplace Clean Indoor Air Law Coverage on Workers' Smoking‐Related Outcomes," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 226-242, February.
    18. Christopher Carpenter & Sabina Postolek & Casey Warman, 2011. "Public-Place Smoking Laws and Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS)," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 3(3), pages 35-61, August.
    19. Madhur Verma & Soundappan Kathirvel & Milan Das & Ramnika Aggarwal & Sonu Goel, 2020. "Trends and patterns of second-hand smoke exposure amongst the non-smokers in India-A secondary data analysis from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) I & II," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, June.
    20. Clément de Chaisemartin & Pierre‐Yves Geoffard & Anne‐Laurence le Faou, 2011. "Workplace smoking ban effects on unhappy smokers," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(9), pages 1043-1055, September.
    21. Silke Anger & Michael Kvasnicka & Thomas Siedler, 2010. "One Last Puff? – Public Smoking Bans and Smoking Behavior," Ruhr Economic Papers 0180, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universität Dortmund, Universität Duisburg-Essen.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reecon:v:79:y:2025:i:4:s1090944325000572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/622941 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.