IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v77y2018icp51-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tea plantations as a driving force of long-term land use and population changes in the Eastern Himalayan piedmont

Author

Listed:
  • Prokop, Paweł

Abstract

Reconstructing the long-term impacts of tea plantations on land use and cover (LULC) change over time is important for making policy decisions on management and conservation. This can be very effectively done by integrating historical and remote sensing data; however, such approach has rarely been used to date. The present study analysed the role of the large tea plantation system in the forest cover change in 2105.9 km2 of the Himalayan piedmont in India’s West Bengal state, from the first settled agriculture in the mid-19th century to present day. The impact of domestic and international markets together with local factors such as floods on tea plantation development were also investigated to identify potential scenarios of LULC change in the next few decades. Analysis of historical and remote sensing data as well as census reports revealed that between 1874 and 2010, forest area decreased by 69.5% and land under tea cultivation increased to 30.7%. Population density grew as much as 5122.2% to 470 people km−2 between 1872 and 2011. Piedmont development was not uniform and denoted two periods: new land use structure formation (1874–1930) and its further stabilization (1930–2010). The first period showed rapid deforestation at an annual rate of 16–30 km2, with an increase of tea production areas up to 16 km2 per year. The second period saw slower deforestation rates (2–4 km2 annually) and steady growth of tea production areas (2 km2 annually). Population growth changed from workforce immigration to settled families. Limited space for settlement expansion favoured population concentration and initiated urbanization processes. Despite the initiation of deforestation and migration through the location of tea gardens, the close relationship between deforestation and population density has not been found in piedmont. At the early stages of plantation development, the greatest deforestation occurred at the lowest population density in the piedmont history. Later, a significant decline in the deforestation rate was accompanied by a demographic explosion. At the same time, reserved forest played the very important role in preserving the remnants of forest cover. Features of the natural environment and land use policy led to tea cultivation approaching maximum expansion in the studied area.

Suggested Citation

  • Prokop, Paweł, 2018. "Tea plantations as a driving force of long-term land use and population changes in the Eastern Himalayan piedmont," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 51-62.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:77:y:2018:i:c:p:51-62
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.035
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837717305586
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.035?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Derek Byerlee, 2014. "The Fall and Rise Again of Plantations in Tropical Asia: History Repeated?," Land, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Choudhury, Govinda, 2015. "Land Tenure and Forest Conservation in the Dooars of the Eastern Himalaya," Review of Agrarian Studies, Foundation for Agrarian Studies, vol. 5(1), July.
    3. Chavas, Jean-Paul, 2001. "Structural change in agricultural production: Economics, technology and policy," Handbook of Agricultural Economics, in: B. L. Gardner & G. C. Rausser (ed.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 5, pages 263-285, Elsevier.
    4. Miyamoto, Motoe & Mohd Parid, Mamat & Noor Aini, Zakaria & Michinaka, Tetsuya, 2014. "Proximate and underlying causes of forest cover change in Peninsular Malaysia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 18-25.
    5. Gupta, Bishnupriya, 2001. "The International Tea Cartel During The Great Depression, 1929–1933," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 61(1), pages 144-159, March.
    6. Miyamoto, Motoe, 2006. "Forest conversion to rubber around Sumatran villages in Indonesia: Comparing the impacts of road construction, transmigration projects and population," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, November.
    7. Govinda Choudhury, 2015. "Land Tenure and Forest Conservation in the Dooars of the Eastern Himalaya," Journal, Review of Agrarian Studies, vol. 5(1), pages 61-87, January-J.
    8. Paweł Prokop & Adam Walanus, 2017. "Impact of the Darjeeling–Bhutan Himalayan front on rainfall hazard pattern," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 89(1), pages 387-404, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Netrananda Sahu & Pritiranjan Das & Atul Saini & Ayush Varun & Suraj Kumar Mallick & Rajiv Nayan & S. P. Aggarwal & Balaram Pani & Ravi Kesharwani & Anil Kumar, 2023. "Analysis of Tea Plantation Suitability Using Geostatistical and Machine Learning Techniques: A Case of Darjeeling Himalaya, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Zhou, Bing-Bing & Aggarwal, Rimjhim & Wu, Jianguo & Lv, Ligang, 2021. "Urbanization-associated farmland loss: A macro-micro comparative study in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    3. Owais Bashir & Shabir Ahmad Bangroo & Wei Guo & Gowhar Meraj & Gebiaw T. Ayele & Nasir Bashir Naikoo & Shahid Shafai & Perminder Singh & Mohammad Muslim & Habitamu Taddese & Irfan Gani & Shafeeq Ur Ra, 2022. "Simulating Spatiotemporal Changes in Land Use and Land Cover of the North-Western Himalayan Region Using Markov Chain Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Manorama Thapa & SUBHANKAR Gurung & Binghui He, 2022. "The Effects of Tea Plantation Upon the Soil Properties Based Upon the Comparative Study of India and China: A Meta – Analysis," Journal of Agriculture and Crops, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 8(4), pages 309-322, 10-2022.
    5. Bin Yang & Zhanqi Wang & Bo Zhang & Di Zhang, 2020. "Allocation Efficiency, Influencing Factors and Optimization Path of Rural Land Resources: A Case Study in Fang County of Hubei Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miyamoto, Motoe, 2020. "Poverty reduction saves forests sustainably: Lessons for deforestation policies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    2. Feil, Jan-Henning & Musshoff, Oliver, 2013. "Investment, disinvestment and policy impact analysis in the dairy sector: a real options approach," Structural Change in Agriculture/Strukturwandel im Agrarsektor (SiAg) Working Papers 159229, Humboldt University Berlin, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    3. Jaza Folefack, Achille Jean & Ngo Njiki, Marie Gaelle & Darr, Dietrich, 2019. "Safeguarding forests from smallholder oil palm expansion by more intensive production? The case of Ngwei forest (Cameroon)," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 45-61.
    4. Deepananda Herath & Alfons Weersink, 2007. "Peasants and plantations in the Sri Lankan tea sector: causes of the change in their relative viability ," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 51(1), pages 73-89, March.
    5. Combes Motel, P. & Pirard, R. & Combes, J.-L., 2009. "A methodology to estimate impacts of domestic policies on deforestation: Compensated Successful Efforts for "avoided deforestation" (REDD)," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 680-691, January.
    6. Zegar, Józef S., 2012. "Gospodarstwa Rodzinne Wobec Wyzwań Wyżywienia I Ochrony Środowiska – Ujęcie Globalne," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 4(157).
    7. Naylor, Rosamond & Fang, Safari & Fanzo, Jessica, 2023. "A global view of aquaculture policy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    8. Manoranjan Ghosh & Somnath Ghosal, 2021. "Climate change vulnerability of rural households in flood-prone areas of Himalayan foothills, West Bengal, India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 2570-2595, February.
    9. Michael Euler & Stefan Schwarze & Hermanto Siregar & Matin Qaim, 2016. "Oil Palm Expansion among Smallholder Farmers in Sumatra, Indonesia," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(3), pages 658-676, September.
    10. Michler, Jeffrey D., 2020. "Agriculture in the process of development: A micro-perspective," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    11. Chavas, Jean-Paul & Barham, Bradford, 2007. "On the Microeconomics of Diversification under Uncertainty and Learning," Staff Paper Series 515, University of Wisconsin, Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    12. von Braun, Joachim & Mirzabaev, Alisher, 2015. "Small Farms: Changing Structures and Roles in Economic Development," Discussion Papers 210464, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    13. Letort, Elodie & Ridier, Aude, 2022. "The economic performance of transitional and non-transitional organic dairy farms: A panel data econometric approach in Brittany," Working Papers 320345, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    14. Madior Fall & Laurent Piet & Muriel Roger, 2010. "Trends in the French commercial farm population," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 91(3), pages 279-295.
    15. Byela Tibesigwa & Martine Visser & Jane Turpie, 2017. "Climate change and South Africa’s commercial farms: an assessment of impacts on specialised horticulture, crop, livestock and mixed farming systems," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 607-636, April.
    16. Vicente Lopez‐Ibor Mayor & Fazlun Khalid & Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed, 2021. "EU–Asian–American Partnership for a Third Industrial Revolution: Transitioning to High Productivity, Sustainable Infrastructures in the Age of COVID‐19," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(3), pages 380-391, May.
    17. Li, Dongmei & Yang, Yuanyuan & Du, Guoming & Huang, Shanlin, 2021. "Understanding the contradiction between rural poverty and rich cultivated land resources: A case study of Heilongjiang Province in Northeast China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    18. Varkkey, Helena & Tyson, Adam & Choiruzzad, Shofwan Al Banna, 2018. "Palm oil intensification and expansion in Indonesia and Malaysia: Environmental and socio-political factors influencing policy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 148-159.
    19. Franziska Appel & Alfons Balmann, 2023. "Predator or prey? Effects of farm growth on neighbouring farms," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 214-236, February.
    20. Zheng, Yanan & Goddard, Ellen W. & Qiu, Feng, 2018. "Exploring the Effect of Disease Outbreaks on Farm Structure Change: A Dynamic Analysis for Canadian Pig Industry," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 273801, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:77:y:2018:i:c:p:51-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.