IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10101-d1179497.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Tea Plantation Suitability Using Geostatistical and Machine Learning Techniques: A Case of Darjeeling Himalaya, India

Author

Listed:
  • Netrananda Sahu

    (Department of Geography, Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, New Delhi 110007, India)

  • Pritiranjan Das

    (Department of Geography, Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, New Delhi 110007, India
    Department of Geography, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Evening College, University of Delhi, New Delhi 110017, India)

  • Atul Saini

    (Delhi School of Climate Change & Sustainability, Institution of Eminence, University of Delhi, New Delhi 110007, India)

  • Ayush Varun

    (Department of Geography, Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, New Delhi 110007, India)

  • Suraj Kumar Mallick

    (Department of Geography, Shaheed Bhagat Singh College, University of Delhi, New Delhi 110017, India)

  • Rajiv Nayan

    (Department of Commerce, Ramanujan College, University of Delhi, New Delhi 110019, India)

  • S. P. Aggarwal

    (Department of Commerce, Ramanujan College, University of Delhi, New Delhi 110019, India)

  • Balaram Pani

    (Department of Chemistry (Environmental Science), Bhaskarcharya College of Applied Science, University of Delhi, New Delhi 110075, India)

  • Ravi Kesharwani

    (Department of Geography, Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, New Delhi 110007, India)

  • Anil Kumar

    (Department of Geography, Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, New Delhi 110007, India)

Abstract

This study aimed to identify suitable sites for tea cultivation using both random forest and logistic regression models. The study utilized 2770 sample points to map the tea plantation suitability zones (TPSZs), considering 12 important conditioning factors, such as temperature, rainfall, elevation, slope, soil depth, soil drainability, soil electrical conductivity, base saturation, soil texture, soil pH, the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and land use land cover (LULC). The data were normalized using ArcGIS 10.2 and the models were calibrated using 70% of the total data, while the remaining 30% of the data were used for validation. The final TPSZ map was classified into four different categories: highly suitable zones, moderately suitable zones, marginally suitable zones, and not-suitable zones. The study revealed that the random forest (RF) model was more precise than the logistic regression model, with areas under the curve (AUCs) of 85.2% and 83.3%, respectively. The results indicated that well-drained soil with a pH range between 5.6 and 6.0 is ideal for tea farming, highlighting the importance of climate and soil properties in tea cultivation. Furthermore, the study emphasized the need to balance economic and environmental considerations when considering tea plantation expansion. The findings of this study provide important insights into tea cultivation site selection and can aid tea farmers, policymakers, and other stakeholders in making informed decisions regarding tea plantation expansion.

Suggested Citation

  • Netrananda Sahu & Pritiranjan Das & Atul Saini & Ayush Varun & Suraj Kumar Mallick & Rajiv Nayan & S. P. Aggarwal & Balaram Pani & Ravi Kesharwani & Anil Kumar, 2023. "Analysis of Tea Plantation Suitability Using Geostatistical and Machine Learning Techniques: A Case of Darjeeling Himalaya, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10101-:d:1179497
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10101/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10101/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. Abdul Rahaman & S. Aruchamy, 2022. "Land Suitability Evaluation of Tea ( Camellia sinensis L.) Plantation in Kallar Watershed of Nilgiri Bioreserve, India," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Vincenzi, Simone & Zucchetta, Matteo & Franzoi, Piero & Pellizzato, Michele & Pranovi, Fabio & De Leo, Giulio A. & Torricelli, Patrizia, 2011. "Application of a Random Forest algorithm to predict spatial distribution of the potential yield of Ruditapes philippinarum in the Venice lagoon, Italy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(8), pages 1471-1478.
    3. Prokop, Paweł, 2018. "Tea plantations as a driving force of long-term land use and population changes in the Eastern Himalayan piedmont," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 51-62.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wiltshire, Kathryn H & Tanner, Jason E, 2020. "Comparing maximum entropy modelling methods to inform aquaculture site selection for novel seaweed species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 429(C).
    2. Bin Yang & Zhanqi Wang & Bo Zhang & Di Zhang, 2020. "Allocation Efficiency, Influencing Factors and Optimization Path of Rural Land Resources: A Case Study in Fang County of Hubei Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Owais Bashir & Shabir Ahmad Bangroo & Wei Guo & Gowhar Meraj & Gebiaw T. Ayele & Nasir Bashir Naikoo & Shahid Shafai & Perminder Singh & Mohammad Muslim & Habitamu Taddese & Irfan Gani & Shafeeq Ur Ra, 2022. "Simulating Spatiotemporal Changes in Land Use and Land Cover of the North-Western Himalayan Region Using Markov Chain Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Dandan Zhao & Hong S. He & Wen J. Wang & Lei Wang & Haibo Du & Kai Liu & Shengwei Zong, 2018. "Predicting Wetland Distribution Changes under Climate Change and Human Activities in a Mid- and High-Latitude Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Jig Han Jeong & Jonathan P Resop & Nathaniel D Mueller & David H Fleisher & Kyungdahm Yun & Ethan E Butler & Dennis J Timlin & Kyo-Moon Shim & James S Gerber & Vangimalla R Reddy & Soo-Hyung Kim, 2016. "Random Forests for Global and Regional Crop Yield Predictions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, June.
    6. So Young Woo & Chung Gil Jung & Ji Wan Lee & Seong Joon Kim, 2019. "Evaluation of Watershed Scale Aquatic Ecosystem Health by SWAT Modeling and Random Forest Technique," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, June.
    7. V. Kohestani & M. Hassanlourad & A. Ardakani, 2015. "Evaluation of liquefaction potential based on CPT data using random forest," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(2), pages 1079-1089, November.
    8. das Neves, Patricia Bittencourt Tavares & Blanco, Claudio José Cavalcante & Montenegro Duarte, André Augusto Azevedo & das Neves, Filipe Bittencourt Souza & das Neves, Isabela Bittencourt Souza & de P, 2021. "Amazon rainforest deforestation influenced by clandestine and regular roadway network," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    9. Zhou, Bing-Bing & Aggarwal, Rimjhim & Wu, Jianguo & Lv, Ligang, 2021. "Urbanization-associated farmland loss: A macro-micro comparative study in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    10. Grimmett, Liam & Whitsed, Rachel & Horta, Ana, 2020. "Presence-only species distribution models are sensitive to sample prevalence: Evaluating models using spatial prediction stability and accuracy metrics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 431(C).
    11. Kosicki, Jakub Z., 2017. "Should topographic metrics be considered when predicting species density of birds on a large geographical scale? A case of Random Forest approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 349(C), pages 76-85.
    12. Dandan Zhao & Hong S. He & Wen J. Wang & Jiping Liu & Haibo Du & Miaomiao Wu & Xinyuan Tan, 2018. "Distribution and Driving Factors of Forest Swamp Conversions in a Cold Temperate Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-14, September.
    13. Ewa Wilk & Małgorzata Krówczyńska & Bogdan Zagajewski, 2019. "Modelling the Spatial Distribution of Asbestos—Cement Products in Poland with the Use of the Random Forest Algorithm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-13, August.
    14. Fukuda, Shinji & Spreer, Wolfram & Yasunaga, Eriko & Yuge, Kozue & Sardsud, Vicha & Müller, Joachim, 2013. "Random Forests modelling for the estimation of mango (Mangifera indica L. cv. Chok Anan) fruit yields under different irrigation regimes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 142-150.
    15. Manorama Thapa & SUBHANKAR Gurung & Binghui He, 2022. "The Effects of Tea Plantation Upon the Soil Properties Based Upon the Comparative Study of India and China: A Meta – Analysis," Journal of Agriculture and Crops, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 8(4), pages 309-322, 10-2022.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10101-:d:1179497. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.