IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v85y2025ics096969892500075x.html

The power of personal losses: How the loss-gain frame influences public green participation intentions

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Chunfeng
  • Zhang, Depeng
  • Zhu, Lu
  • Wu, Junbao

Abstract

Despite the growing public awareness of environmental issues, a common gap between attitude and behavior persists. Effectively promoting public participation in pro-environmental actions remains a critical challenge in enhancing environmental governance. This research focuses on the gain-loss framing of green appeals and develops a research model to investigate the influence of different framing types (personal loss vs. collective gain) on the public's intention to engage in green behavior. Through four experiments, including both field and laboratory studies, the research demonstrates that framing green appeals in terms of personal losses is more likely to foster a higher intention to engage in green behavior than framing them in terms of collective gains. The underlying mechanism of this effect is that emphasizing personal losses strengthens the public's sense of psychological empowerment, thereby increasing their sense of green self-accountability, which, in turn, boosts their intentions to participate in green behaviors. However, this effect is moderated by individuals' green self-efficacy. The higher an individual's green self-efficacy, the weaker the impact of the gain-loss framing on their psychological empowerment.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Chunfeng & Zhang, Depeng & Zhu, Lu & Wu, Junbao, 2025. "The power of personal losses: How the loss-gain frame influences public green participation intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:85:y:2025:i:c:s096969892500075x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096969892500075X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2025.104296?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tran, Thi Thanh Huong & Paparoidamis, Nicholas G., 2021. "Taking a closer look: Reasserting the role of self-accountability in ethical consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 542-555.
    2. Hung Vu Nguyen & Cuong Hung Nguyen & Thoa Thi Bao Hoang, 2019. "Green consumption: Closing the intention‐behavior gap," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 118-129, January.
    3. Micael-Lee Johnstone & Lay Tan, 2015. "Exploring the Gap Between Consumers’ Green Rhetoric and Purchasing Behaviour," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(2), pages 311-328, December.
    4. Carissa Dieli & Anushree Priyadarshini & Robert Ludgate & Lorraine Foley, 2024. "Bridging the Gap: Determinants of Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Environmentally Friendly Packages of Leafy Greens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Yu-Shan Chen & Ching-Hsun Chang & Shu-Ling Yeh & Hsin-I Cheng, 2015. "Green shared vision and green creativity: the mediation roles of green mindfulness and green self-efficacy," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 1169-1184, May.
    6. Sun, Qingzhou & Guo, Haozhi & Wang, Jiarui & Zhang, Jing & Jiang, Chengming & Liu, Yongfang, 2021. "Differences in cooperation between social dilemmas of gain and loss," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(6), pages 1506-1524, November.
    7. J. Miguel Villas-Boas, 2024. "Toward an Information-Processing Theory of Loss Aversion," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(3), pages 523-541, May.
    8. Kirsten Passyn & Mita Sujan, 2006. "Self-Accountability Emotions and Fear Appeals: Motivating Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 32(4), pages 583-589, March.
    9. John G. Lynch Jr., 2006. "Accessibility-Diagnosticity and the Multiple Pathway Anchoring and Adjustment Model," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 33(1), pages 25-27, June.
    10. Yang, Defeng & Lu, Yue & Zhu, Wenting & Su, Chenting, 2015. "Going green: How different advertising appeals impact green consumption behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(12), pages 2663-2675.
    11. George E. Newman & Margarita Gorlin & Ravi Dhar, 2014. "When Going Green Backfires: How Firm Intentions Shape the Evaluation of Socially Beneficial Product Enhancements," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(3), pages 823-839.
    12. Kim, Soo Hyun & Seock, Yoo-Kyoung, 2019. "The roles of values and social norm on personal norms and pro-environmentally friendly apparel product purchasing behavior: The mediating role of personal norms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 83-90.
    13. Dhir, Amandeep & Sadiq, Mohd & Talwar, Shalini & Sakashita, Mototaka & Kaur, Puneet, 2021. "Why do retail consumers buy green apparel? A knowledge-attitude-behaviour-context perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    14. Gleim, Mark R. & Smith, Jeffery S. & Andrews, Demetra & Cronin, J. Joseph, 2013. "Against the Green: A Multi-method Examination of the Barriers to Green Consumption," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 44-61.
    15. Lee, Sun Young & Kim, Yeuseung & Kim, Young, 2021. "Engaging consumers with corporate social responsibility campaigns: The roles of interactivity, psychological empowerment, and identification," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 507-517.
    16. Ishaq, Muhammad Ishtiaq & Baloch, Rukhsar & Raza, Ali & Talpur, Qurat-ul-ain & Ahmad, Rehan, 2025. "Ecological consciousness, moral self-identity and green conspicuous behavior: Moderating role of religiosity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    17. Noah J. Goldstein & Robert B. Cialdini & Vladas Griskevicius, 2008. "A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 35(3), pages 472-482, March.
    18. Ali Nawaz Khan, 2024. "Elucidating the effects of environmental consciousness and environmental attitude on green travel behavior: Moderating role of green self‐efficacy," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 2223-2232, June.
    19. Qingzhou Sun & Haozhi Guo & Jiarui Wang & Jing Zhang & Chengming Jiang & Yongfang Liu, 2021. "Differences in cooperation between social dilemmas of gain and loss," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 16(6), pages 1506-1524, November.
    20. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goodarzi, Shadi & Masini, Andrea & Aflaki, Sam & Fahimnia, Behnam, 2021. "Right information at the right time: Reevaluating the attitude–behavior gap in environmental technology adoption," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    2. Wintschnig, Bea Alexandra, 2021. "The Attitude-Behavior Gap – Drivers and Barriers of Sustainable Consumption," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 6(2), pages 324-346.
    3. Matthew B. Lunde, 2018. "Sustainability in marketing: a systematic review unifying 20 years of theoretical and substantive contributions (1997–2016)," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 8(3), pages 85-110, December.
    4. Hilton, Joshua, 2025. "An integrated analysis of greenhush," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 4(2).
    5. Shamila Nabi Khan & Nayab Minhas & Nathan Neale, 2025. "Bridging the green gap: examining consumer green perceptions in an extended model of theory of planned behavior," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-24, December.
    6. Dixon, Darcie & Mikolon, Sven, 2021. "Cents of self: How and when self-signals influence consumer value derived from choices of green products," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 365-386.
    7. Gleim, Mark R. & McCullough, Heath & Sreen, Naman & Pant, Logan G., 2023. "Is doing right all that matters in sustainability marketing? The role of fit in sustainable marketing strategies," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    8. Pengfei Deng & Xingye Zhou & Dan Xie & Peng Zheng, 2024. "How to Drive Tourists’ Pro-Environmental Behavior: Interactive Effect of Benefit Appeals and Goal Framing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-19, June.
    9. David Bürgin & Robert Wilken, 2022. "Increasing Consumers’ Purchase Intentions Toward Fair-Trade Products Through Partitioned Pricing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(4), pages 1015-1040, December.
    10. Loebnitz, Natascha & Frank, Phillip & Otterbring, Tobias, 2022. "Stairway to organic heaven: The impact of social and temporal distance in print ads," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1044-1057.
    11. Dan R. Bradbury & J. Joseph Cronin, 2025. "Environmentally friendly but strategically useful? A systematic review of marketing’s consideration of green initiatives," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 15(1), pages 261-288, June.
    12. Todd D. Gerarden & Richard G. Newell & Robert N. Stavins, 2025. "Assessing the Energy-Efficiency Gap," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Economics of Environment, Climate Change, and Wine Selected Papers of Robert N Stavins Volume 3 (2011–2023), chapter 4, pages 53-118, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    13. Ming, Yaxin & Deng, Huixin & Wu, Xiaoyue, 2022. "The negative effect of air pollution on people's pro-environmental behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 72-87.
    14. Zou, Lili Wenli & Chan, Ricky Y.K., 2019. "Why and when do consumers perform green behaviors? An examination of regulatory focus and ethical ideology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 113-127.
    15. Sebastian Schneider, 2022. "Price-related consumer discussions in China and the United States: a cross-cultural study investigating price perceptions and word-of-mouth transmission," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(3), pages 274-290, June.
    16. Petschnig, Martin & Heidenreich, Sven & Spieth, Patrick, 2014. "Innovative alternatives take action – Investigating determinants of alternative fuel vehicle adoption," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 68-83.
    17. Joerß, Tom & Hoffmann, Stefan & Mai, Robert & Akbar, Payam, 2021. "Digitalization as solution to environmental problems? When users rely on augmented reality-recommendation agents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 510-523.
    18. Schleich, Joachim & Gassmann, Xavier & Faure, Corinne & Meissner, Thomas, 2016. "Making the implicit explicit: A look inside the implicit discount rate," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 321-331.
    19. Häckel, Björn & Pfosser, Stefan & Tränkler, Timm, 2017. "Explaining the energy efficiency gap - Expected Utility Theory versus Cumulative Prospect Theory," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 414-426.
    20. Heutel, Garth, 2019. "Prospect theory and energy efficiency," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 236-254.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:85:y:2025:i:c:s096969892500075x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.