IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joreco/v79y2024ics0969698924000997.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to make busy individuals donate more? The matching effect of charitable appeals and busyness on willingness to donate

Author

Listed:
  • Zheng, Chundong
  • Liu, Xinru
  • Liu, Shuqin

Abstract

Busyness is one of the most common states of the modern consumer. Previous studies have mainly distinguished busyness from the perspective of time pressure, but have not clearly categorized it. This study classifies busyness into two types: proactive busyness and forced busyness, based on the difference in the subject of work task assignment. This study proposes and tests a conceptual model based on the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) to reveal how to increase the willingness to donate of individuals with different types of busyness. Four studies were conducted in this research. The results showed that rational appeals increase the willingness to donate of proactively busy individuals by stimulating cognitive empathy. In contrast, emotional appeals increase the willingness to donate of forcedly busy individuals by activating affective empathy. This study also revealed that the potential boundary condition of this influence mechanism is the goal frame.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheng, Chundong & Liu, Xinru & Liu, Shuqin, 2024. "How to make busy individuals donate more? The matching effect of charitable appeals and busyness on willingness to donate," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:79:y:2024:i:c:s0969698924000997
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103803
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969698924000997
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103803?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joreco:v:79:y:2024:i:c:s0969698924000997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-retailing-and-consumer-services .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.