IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jomega/v36y2008i3p363-372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multi-objective geographic information system for route selection of nuclear waste transport

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Yuh-Wen
  • Wang, Chi-Hwang
  • Lin, Sain-Ju

Abstract

Nuclear power is widely used throughout the world today. Functioning nuclear power plants produce large quantities of radioactive wastes needing to be transported to safe sites for proper management. With public emphasis on environmental protection and concern for safe transport of nuclear wastes, the problem of selecting an appropriate route for transporting nuclear wastes is a vitally important issue. The aforementioned route selection problem involves conflicting objectives among interested parties; therefore, we develop a multi-objective geographic information system (GIS) with ESRI ArcView GIS 3.x interface to practically support the involved parties for such a multi-objective route selection problem in engineering practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Yuh-Wen & Wang, Chi-Hwang & Lin, Sain-Ju, 2008. "A multi-objective geographic information system for route selection of nuclear waste transport," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 363-372, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:36:y:2008:i:3:p:363-372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305-0483(06)00120-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bahar Y. Kara & Vedat Verter, 2004. "Designing a Road Network for Hazardous Materials Transportation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 188-196, May.
    2. Saltelli A. & Tarantola S., 2002. "On the Relative Importance of Input Factors in Mathematical Models: Safety Assessment for Nuclear Waste Disposal," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 97, pages 702-709, September.
    3. Patricia E. Boiko & Richard L. Morrill & James Flynn & Elaine M. Faustman & Gerald van Belle & Gilbert S. Omenn, 1996. "Who Holds the Stakes? A Case Study of Stakeholder Identification at Two Nuclear Weapons Production Sites," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 237-249, April.
    4. Aldrich, Mark, 2002. "Regulating Transportation of Hazardous Substances: Railroads and Reform, 1883–1930," Business History Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 76(2), pages 267-297, July.
    5. George List & Pitu Mirchandani, 1991. "An Integrated Network/Planar Multiobjective Model for Routing and Siting for Hazardous Materials and Wastes," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 146-156, May.
    6. Mary Riddel & Christine Dwyer & W. Douglass Shaw, 2003. "Environmental Risk and Uncertainty: Insights from Yucca Mountain," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 435-458, August.
    7. G. Scott Mills & K. Sieglinde Neuhauser, 1998. "Urban Risks of Truck Transport of Radioactive Material," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(6), pages 781-785, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kim, Changsu & Yang, Kyung Hoon & Kim, Jaekyung, 2008. "A strategy for third-party logistics systems: A case analysis using the blue ocean strategy," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 522-534, August.
    2. Marion Rauner & Michaela Schaffhauser-Linzatti & Helmut Niessner, 2012. "Resource planning for ambulance services in mass casualty incidents: a DES-based policy model," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 254-269, September.
    3. Wei Huang & Peiqi Hu & Fu-Sheng Tsai & Yinke Liu & Yu Huang, 2022. "Smart Sales Empower Small Farmers: An Integrated Matching Method between Suppliers and Consumers Based on the Information Axiom," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    4. De Boeck, Kim & Decouttere, Catherine & Jónasson, Jónas Oddur & Vandaele, Nico, 2022. "Vaccine supply chains in resource-limited settings: Mitigating the impact of rainy season disruptions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 301(1), pages 300-317.
    5. Mota, Caroline Maria de Miranda & Figueiredo, Ciro José Jardim de & Pereira, Débora Viana e Sousa, 2021. "Identifying areas vulnerable to homicide using multiple criteria analysis and spatial analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    6. Murray, Alan T., 2021. "Contemporary optimization application through geographic information systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    7. Ditta, A. & Figueroa, O. & Galindo, G. & Yie-Pinedo, R., 2019. "A review on research in transportation of hazardous materials," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    8. Overholts II, Dale L. & Bell, John E. & Arostegui, Marvin A., 2009. "A location analysis approach for military maintenance scheduling with geographically dispersed service areas," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 838-852, August.
    9. Noguchi, H. & Hienuki, S. & Fuse, M., 2020. "Network theory-based accident scenario analysis for hazardous material transport: A case study of liquefied petroleum gas transport in japan," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    10. Zajac, Sandra & Huber, Sandra, 2021. "Objectives and methods in multi-objective routing problems: a survey and classification scheme," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 1-25.
    11. Xin, Li & Xi, Chen & Sagir, Mujgan & Wenbo, Zhang, 2023. "How can infectious medical waste be forecasted and transported during the COVID-19 pandemic? A hybrid two-stage method," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    12. Chung, Sung H. & Weaver, Robert D. & Friesz, Terry L., 2012. "Oligopolies in pollution permit markets: A dynamic game approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 48-56.
    13. Macharis, Cathy & Bernardini, Annalia, 2015. "Reviewing the use of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the evaluation of transport projects: Time for a multi-actor approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 177-186.
    14. Mor, Andrea & Archetti, Claudia & Jabali, Ola & Simonetto, Alberto & Speranza, M. Grazia, 2022. "The Bi-objective Long-haul Transportation Problem on a Road Network," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    15. Li, Cong-Cong & Dong, Yucheng & Liang, Haiming & Pedrycz, Witold & Herrera, Francisco, 2022. "Data-driven method to learning personalized individual semantics to support linguistic multi-attribute decision making," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    16. David M. Goldberg & Sukhwa Hong, 2019. "Minimizing the Risks of Highway Transport of Hazardous Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-10, November.
    17. Chunlin Xin & Jie Wang & Ziping Wang & Chia-Huei Wu & Muhammad Nawaz & Sang-Bing Tsai, 2022. "Reverse logistics research of municipal hazardous waste: a literature review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1495-1531, February.
    18. Tao, Longlong & Wu, Jie & Ge, Daochuan & Chen, Liwei & Sun, Ming, 2022. "Risk-informed based comprehensive path-planning method for radioactive materials road transportation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kumar, Anand & Roy, Debjit & Verter, Vedat & Sharma, Dheeraj, 2018. "Integrated fleet mix and routing decision for hazmat transportation: A developing country perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 225-238.
    2. Bronfman, Andrés & Marianov, Vladimir & Paredes-Belmar, Germán & Lüer-Villagra, Armin, 2015. "The maximin HAZMAT routing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 241(1), pages 15-27.
    3. Bronfman, Andrés & Marianov, Vladimir & Paredes-Belmar, Germán & Lüer-Villagra, Armin, 2016. "The maxisum and maximin-maxisum HAZMAT routing problems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 316-333.
    4. Eric Tate, 2012. "Social vulnerability indices: a comparative assessment using uncertainty and sensitivity analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 63(2), pages 325-347, September.
    5. S. Cucurachi & E. Borgonovo & R. Heijungs, 2016. "A Protocol for the Global Sensitivity Analysis of Impact Assessment Models in Life Cycle Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 357-377, February.
    6. Plischke, Elmar & Borgonovo, Emanuele, 2019. "Copula theory and probabilistic sensitivity analysis: Is there a connection?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 1046-1059.
    7. Borgonovo, E., 2010. "Sensitivity analysis with finite changes: An application to modified EOQ models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 127-138, January.
    8. Tarantola, S. & Gatelli, D. & Mara, T.A., 2006. "Random balance designs for the estimation of first order global sensitivity indices," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(6), pages 717-727.
    9. Bogyrbayeva, Aigerim & Kwon, Changhyun, 2021. "Pessimistic evasive flow capturing problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(1), pages 133-148.
    10. Tobias Fissler & Silvana M. Pesenti, 2022. "Sensitivity Measures Based on Scoring Functions," Papers 2203.00460, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    11. Mohri, Seyed Sina & Mohammadi, Mehrdad & Gendreau, Michel & Pirayesh, Amir & Ghasemaghaei, Ali & Salehi, Vahid, 2022. "Hazardous material transportation problems: A comprehensive overview of models and solution approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 1-38.
    12. Erhan Erkut & Vedat Verter, 1995. "A Framework for Hazardous Materials Transport Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(5), pages 589-601, October.
    13. Shang, Xiaobing & Su, Li & Fang, Hai & Zeng, Bowen & Zhang, Zhi, 2023. "An efficient multi-fidelity Kriging surrogate model-based method for global sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    14. Lu, Xuefei & Borgonovo, Emanuele, 2023. "Global sensitivity analysis in epidemiological modeling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(1), pages 9-24.
    15. Xuefei Lu & Alessandro Rudi & Emanuele Borgonovo & Lorenzo Rosasco, 2020. "Faster Kriging: Facing High-Dimensional Simulators," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 233-249, January.
    16. Becker William & Paruolo Paolo & Saltelli Andrea, 2021. "Variable Selection in Regression Models Using Global Sensitivity Analysis," Journal of Time Series Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(2), pages 187-233, July.
    17. Ke, Ginger Y. & Zhang, Huiwen & Bookbinder, James H., 2020. "A dual toll policy for maintaining risk equity in hazardous materials transportation with fuzzy incident rate," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    18. Paul Berglund & Changhyun Kwon, 2014. "Robust Facility Location Problem for Hazardous Waste Transportation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 91-116, March.
    19. Hunkar Toyoglu & Oya Ekin Karasan & Bahar Yetis Kara, 2011. "Distribution network design on the battlefield," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(3), pages 188-209, April.
    20. Bolado-Lavin, R. & Castaings, W. & Tarantola, S., 2009. "Contribution to the sample mean plot for graphical and numerical sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(6), pages 1041-1049.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jomega:v:36:y:2008:i:3:p:363-372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/375/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.