IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/joecag/v32y2025ics2212828x25000623.html

Free health check-ups and chronic disease care among older adults in China

Author

Listed:
  • Huang, Zhiyong
  • Kämpfen, Fabrice

Abstract

We evaluate the impact of a free health check-up program targeting older adults in China on the diagnosis and management of chronic diseases, focusing on hypertension and diabetes. Drawing on nine years of panel data from five waves of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), we use a fixed-effects instrumental variable (IV) strategy that leverages age-based eligibility (65+) for free check-ups to address endogeneity in health service uptake. Our findings show that eligibility for a check-up increases the probability of diabetes diagnosis by 8.3 percentage points (p = 0.042), with even stronger effects for women in rural areas (13.3 percentage points, p = 0.063). In contrast, we find no significant impact on hypertension diagnosis. Although the check-up policy improves diabetes detection, our causal estimates show no statistically significant effects on treatment, disease control, or provider recommendations. For hypertension, the policy raises lifestyle advice, but we estimate no precise impacts on clinical outcomes. These results suggest that while preventive screening can enhance disease detection among older adults, substantial gaps remain in the delivery of effective follow-up care and disease management. This has important implications for designing cost-effective chronic disease interventions in aging populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang, Zhiyong & Kämpfen, Fabrice, 2025. "Free health check-ups and chronic disease care among older adults in China," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 32(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:joecag:v:32:y:2025:i:c:s2212828x25000623
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jeoa.2025.100607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212828X25000623
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jeoa.2025.100607?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carolin E. Pflueger & Su Wang, 2015. "A robust test for weak instruments in Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 15(1), pages 216-225, March.
    2. Gaggero, Alessio & Gil, Joan & Jiménez-Rubio, Dolores & Zucchelli, Eugenio, 2022. "Does health information affect lifestyle behaviours? The impact of a diabetes diagnosis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    3. Angus Deaton, 2010. "Instruments, Randomization, and Learning about Development," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 48(2), pages 424-455, June.
    4. David S. Lee & Justin McCrary & Marcelo J. Moreira & Jack Porter, 2022. "Valid t-Ratio Inference for IV," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(10), pages 3260-3290, October.
    5. Kim, Hyuncheol Bryant & Lee, Suejin A. & Lim, Wilfredo, 2019. "Knowing is not half the battle: Impacts of information from the National Health Screening Program in Korea," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 1-14.
    6. Kämpfen, Fabrice & Maurer, Jürgen, 2016. "Time to burn (calories)? The impact of retirement on physical activity among mature Americans," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 91-102.
    7. Isaiah Andrews & James H. Stock & Liyang Sun, 2019. "Weak Instruments in Instrumental Variables Regression: Theory and Practice," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 727-753, August.
    8. Guo, Lin & Sang, Bin & Zhang, Linlin & Yin, Wenqiang & Yuan, Xiaoping & Ma, Chunxiao, 2024. "Easing caregiver strain: The power of health check-ups," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 362(C).
    9. Heckman, James J. & Urzúa, Sergio, 2010. "Comparing IV with structural models: What simple IV can and cannot identify," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 156(1), pages 27-37, May.
    10. Alberto Ciancio & Fabrice Kämpfen & Hans-Peter Kohler & Rebecca Thornton, 2025. "Surviving Bad News: Health Information without Treatment Options," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Iizuka, Toshiaki & Nishiyama, Katsuhiko & Chen, Brian & Eggleston, Karen, 2021. "False alarm? Estimating the marginal value of health signals," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    12. Imbens, Guido W & Angrist, Joshua D, 1994. "Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 62(2), pages 467-475, March.
    13. Slade, Alexander N., 2012. "Health investment decisions in response to diabetes information in older Americans," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 502-520.
    14. Keane, Michael & Neal, Timothy, 2023. "Instrument strength in IV estimation and inference: A guide to theory and practice," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 1625-1653.
    15. Kämpfen, Fabrice & Mosca, Irene, 2024. "Heterogeneous effects of blood pressure screening," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    16. Tiantian Dai & Shenyi Jiang & Xiangbo Liu & Ang Sun, 2022. "The effects of a hypertension diagnosis on health behaviors: A two‐dimensional regression discontinuity analysis," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 574-596, April.
    17. Shaoda Wang & David Y. Yang, 2025. "Policy Experimentation in China: The Political Economy of Policy Learning," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 133(7), pages 2180-2228.
    18. Emily Oster, 2018. "Diabetes and Diet: Purchasing Behavior Change in Response to Health Information," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 10(4), pages 308-348, October.
    19. Pascaline Dupas, 2011. "Health Behavior in Developing Countries," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 3(1), pages 425-449, September.
    20. Guido W. Imbens, 2010. "Better LATE Than Nothing: Some Comments on Deaton (2009) and Heckman and Urzua (2009)," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 48(2), pages 399-423, June.
    21. Fabrice Kämpfen & Nilmini Wijemunige & Benedict Evangelista, 2018. "Aging, non-communicable diseases, and old-age disability in low- and middle-income countries: a challenge for global health," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(9), pages 1011-1012, December.
    22. José Luis Montiel Olea & Carolin Pflueger, 2013. "A Robust Test for Weak Instruments," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 358-369, July.
    23. Capuno, Joseph & Kraft, Aleli & O'Donnell, Owen, 2021. "Effectiveness of clinic-based cardiovascular disease prevention: A randomized encouragement design experiment in the Philippines," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    24. Ciancio, Alberto & Kämpfen, Fabrice & Kohler, Hans-Peter & Kohler, Iliana V., 2021. "Health screening for emerging non-communicable disease burdens among the global poor: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kämpfen, F.; & Gómez-Olivé, X.; & O’Donnell, O.; & Riumallo Herl, C.;, 2023. "Effectiveness of Population-Based Hypertension Screening: A Multidimensional Regression Discontinuity Design," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 23/15, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    2. Mogstad, Magne & Torgovitsky, Alexander, 2024. "Instrumental variables with unobserved heterogeneity in treatment effects," Handbook of Labor Economics,, Elsevier.
    3. Gaggero, Alessio & Gil, Joan & Jiménez-Rubio, Dolores & Zucchelli, Eugenio, 2022. "Does health information affect lifestyle behaviours? The impact of a diabetes diagnosis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    4. Meng ZHAO & Ting YIN & Yoichi SEKIZAWA, 2023. "Make Behavioral Changes for a Healthier Liver? Evidence from a liver function test in Japan," Discussion papers 23010, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    5. Breen, Richard & Ermisch, John, 2021. "Instrumental Variable Estimation in Demographic Studies: The LATE interpretation of the IV estimator with heterogenous effects," SocArXiv vx9m7, Center for Open Science.
    6. Peter Hull & Michal Kolesár & Christopher Walters, 2022. "Labor by design: contributions of David Card, Joshua Angrist, and Guido Imbens," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 124(3), pages 603-645, July.
    7. Arne Henningsen & Guy Low & David Wuepper & Tobias Dalhaus & Hugo Storm & Dagim Belay & Stefan Hirsch, 2026. "Estimating Causal Effects With Observational Data: Guidelines for Agricultural and Applied Economists," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(2), pages 356-382, June.
    8. Anna Baiardi & Paul S. Clarke & Andrea A. Naghi & Annalivia Polselli, 2026. "Double Machine Learning for Static Panel Data with Instrumental Variables: New Method and Applications," Papers 2603.20464, arXiv.org.
    9. Wang, Wenjie & Zhang, Yichong, 2024. "Wild bootstrap inference for instrumental variables regressions with weak and few clusters," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 241(1).
    10. repec:osf:socarx:vx9m7_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Jeffrey Smith & Arthur Sweetman, 2016. "Viewpoint: Estimating the causal effects of policies and programs," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 49(3), pages 871-905, August.
    12. Duo Qin & Yanqun Zhang, 2013. "A History of Polyvalent Structural Parameters: the Case of Instrument Variable Estimators," Working Papers 183, Department of Economics, SOAS University of London, UK.
    13. Martin Huber, 2019. "An introduction to flexible methods for policy evaluation," Papers 1910.00641, arXiv.org.
    14. Titus J. Galama & Adriana Lleras-Muney & Hans van Kippersluis, 2018. "The Effect of Education on Health and Mortality: A Review of Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Evidence," NBER Working Papers 24225, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Martin Huber & Giovanni Mellace, 2010. "Sharp IV bounds on average treatment effects under endogeneity and noncompliance," University of St. Gallen Department of Economics working paper series 2010 2010-31, Department of Economics, University of St. Gallen.
    16. Huber, Martin & Wüthrich, Kaspar, 2017. "Evaluating local average and quantile treatment effects under endogeneity based on instruments: a review," FSES Working Papers 479, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Freiburg/Fribourg Switzerland.
    17. Nobel Prize Committee, 2021. "Answering causal questions using observational data," Nobel Prize in Economics documents 2021-2, Nobel Prize Committee.
    18. Black, Dan A. & Joo, Joonhwi & LaLonde, Robert & Smith, Jeffrey A. & Taylor, Evan J., 2022. "Simple Tests for Selection: Learning More from Instrumental Variables," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    19. Alberto Bisin & Andrea Moro, 2020. "LATE for History," NBER Working Papers 28113, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Kämpfen, Fabrice & Maurer, Jürgen, 2016. "Time to burn (calories)? The impact of retirement on physical activity among mature Americans," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 91-102.
    21. Blaise Melly und Kaspar W thrich, 2016. "Local quantile treatment effects," Diskussionsschriften dp1605, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • C26 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Instrumental Variables (IV) Estimation
    • I12 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Behavior
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • J14 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of the Elderly; Economics of the Handicapped; Non-Labor Market Discrimination

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:joecag:v:32:y:2025:i:c:s2212828x25000623. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-journal-of-the-economics-of-ageing .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.