IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v100y2025ics0047235225001230.html

Interpretable Machine Learning and Criminological Theories: Global Evidence on Bullying Perpetration and Victimization (2001–2014)

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, Heejin
  • Wilcox, Pamela
  • Chang, Won

Abstract

While existing criminological theories offer valuable insights into the risk factors associated with bullying perpetration and victimization, further empirical assessments are needed—particularly across diverse temporal and cultural contexts. This study applies interpretable machine learning (IML), specifically random forest algorithms with feature importance measures, to explore the predictive relevance of key factors using four waves (2001–2014) of the Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) survey across approximately 40 countries. The findings reveal that antisocial lifestyle factors are the most salient predictors of bullying perpetration, whereas physical and psychological traits are more strongly associated with victimization. These patterns demonstrate notable consistency across both time and region, reinforcing the applicability of existing theoretical frameworks. By using the transparency of IML, this study not only evaluates core theoretical claims but also contributes to the development of targeted, evidence-based policies and interventions for bullying prevention in school settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Heejin & Wilcox, Pamela & Chang, Won, 2025. "Interpretable Machine Learning and Criminological Theories: Global Evidence on Bullying Perpetration and Victimization (2001–2014)," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:100:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225001230
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225001230
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102474?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard A. Berk & Susan B. Sorenson & Geoffrey Barnes, 2016. "Forecasting Domestic Violence: A Machine Learning Approach to Help Inform Arraignment Decisions," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 94-115, March.
    2. Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic & Julie M Donohue & Eric G Hulsey & Susan Barnes & Yuan Li & Courtney C Kuza & Qingnan Yang & Jeanine Buchanich & James L Huang & Christina Mair & Debbie L Wilson & Walid F Gellad, 2021. "Integrating human services and criminal justice data with claims data to predict risk of opioid overdose among Medicaid beneficiaries: A machine-learning approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Jon Pareliussen & Christophe André & Hyunjeong Hwang, 2019. "Improving school results and equity in compulsory education in Sweden," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1587, OECD Publishing.
    4. Reid, Joan A. & Beauregard, Eric, 2020. "Exploring a machine learning approach: Predicting death in sexual assault," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    5. Guido Vittorio Travaini & Federico Pacchioni & Silvia Bellumore & Marta Bosia & Francesco De Micco, 2022. "Machine Learning and Criminal Justice: A Systematic Review of Advanced Methodology for Recidivism Risk Prediction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-13, August.
    6. N. Tollenaar & P. G. M. van der Heijden, 2013. "Which method predicts recidivism best?: a comparison of statistical, machine learning and data mining predictive models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 176(2), pages 565-584, February.
    7. Jon Kleinberg & Himabindu Lakkaraju & Jure Leskovec & Jens Ludwig & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2018. "Human Decisions and Machine Predictions," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 133(1), pages 237-293.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard Berk, 2019. "Accuracy and Fairness for Juvenile Justice Risk Assessments," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 175-194, March.
    2. Thomas A. Loughran & Megan Augustyn & Mauri Matsuda & Kimberly L. Henry, 2024. "Prognosticating Offending in Early Adulthood: How Early Can We Predict?," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 99-129, March.
    3. Eli Ben-Michael & D. James Greiner & Melody Huang & Kosuke Imai & Zhichao Jiang & Sooahn Shin, 2024. "Does AI help humans make better decisions? A statistical evaluation framework for experimental and observational studies," Papers 2403.12108, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    4. Sophie-Charlotte Klose & Johannes Lederer, 2020. "A Pipeline for Variable Selection and False Discovery Rate Control With an Application in Labor Economics," Papers 2006.12296, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    5. D’Acunto, Francesco & Ghosh, Pulak & Rossi, Alberto G., 2026. "How costly are cultural biases? Evidence from FinTech," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    6. Peng, Qiao & McKillop, Donal & Quinn, Barry & Liu, Kailong, 2025. "Modeling and predicting failure in US credit unions," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 1237-1259.
    7. Fernanda Sobrino & Adolfo De Unánue T. & Edgar Hernández & Patricia Villa & Elena Villalobos & David Aké & Stephany Cisneros & Cristian Paul Camacho Osnay & Armando García Neri & Israel Hernández, 2026. "Designing AI for Prosecutorial Governance: Case Prioritization and Statutory Oversight in Mexico," Working Paper Series of the School of Government and Public Transformation 24, School of Governement and Public Transformation.
    8. Daníelsson, Jón & Macrae, Robert & Uthemann, Andreas, 2022. "Artificial intelligence and systemic risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    9. Yucheng Yang & Zhong Zheng & Weinan E, 2020. "Interpretable Neural Networks for Panel Data Analysis in Economics," Papers 2010.05311, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2020.
    10. Daniel Carter & Amelia Acker & Dan Sholler, 2021. "Investigative approaches to researching information technology companies," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(6), pages 655-666, June.
    11. Jens Ludwig & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2021. "Fragile Algorithms and Fallible Decision-Makers: Lessons from the Justice System," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 35(4), pages 71-96, Fall.
    12. Zhao, Shuping & Xu, Kai & Wang, Zhao & Liang, Changyong & Lu, Wenxing & Chen, Bo, 2022. "Financial distress prediction by combining sentiment tone features," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    13. Garbero, Alessandra & Sakos, Grayson & Cerulli, Giovanni, 2023. "Towards data-driven project design: Providing optimal treatment rules for development projects," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    14. Maude Lavanchy & Patrick Reichert & Jayanth Narayanan & Krishna Savani, 2023. "Applicants’ Fairness Perceptions of Algorithm-Driven Hiring Procedures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 125-150, November.
    15. Md Mohsan Khudri & Kang Keun Rhee & Mohammad Shabbir Hasan & Karar Zunaid Ahsan, 2023. "Predicting nutritional status for women of childbearing age from their economic, health, and demographic features: A supervised machine learning approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-31, May.
    16. Pilar Garcia‐Gomez & Pierre Koning & Owen O'Donnell & Carlos Riumalló‐Herl, 2025. "Selective exercise of discretion in disability insurance awards," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(3), pages 816-835, June.
    17. Ratzanyel Rincón, 2023. "Quarterly multidimensional poverty estimates in Mexico using machine learning algorithms/Estimaciones trimestrales de pobreza multidimensional en México mediante algoritmos de aprendizaje de máquina," Estudios Económicos, El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Económicos, vol. 38(1), pages 3-68.
    18. Klockmann, Victor & von Schenk, Alicia & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2022. "Artificial intelligence, ethics, and intergenerational responsibility," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 284-317.
    19. Jeffrey Grogger & Sean Gupta & Ria Ivandic & Tom Kirchmaier, 2021. "Comparing Conventional and Machine‐Learning Approaches to Risk Assessment in Domestic Abuse Cases," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 90-130, March.
    20. Ostheimer, Julia & Chowdhury, Soumitra & Iqbal, Sarfraz, 2021. "An alliance of humans and machines for machine learning: Hybrid intelligent systems and their design principles," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:100:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225001230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.