IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jcjust/v100y2025ics0047235225001230.html

Interpretable Machine Learning and Criminological Theories: Global Evidence on Bullying Perpetration and Victimization (2001–2014)

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, Heejin
  • Wilcox, Pamela
  • Chang, Won

Abstract

While existing criminological theories offer valuable insights into the risk factors associated with bullying perpetration and victimization, further empirical assessments are needed—particularly across diverse temporal and cultural contexts. This study applies interpretable machine learning (IML), specifically random forest algorithms with feature importance measures, to explore the predictive relevance of key factors using four waves (2001–2014) of the Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) survey across approximately 40 countries. The findings reveal that antisocial lifestyle factors are the most salient predictors of bullying perpetration, whereas physical and psychological traits are more strongly associated with victimization. These patterns demonstrate notable consistency across both time and region, reinforcing the applicability of existing theoretical frameworks. By using the transparency of IML, this study not only evaluates core theoretical claims but also contributes to the development of targeted, evidence-based policies and interventions for bullying prevention in school settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Heejin & Wilcox, Pamela & Chang, Won, 2025. "Interpretable Machine Learning and Criminological Theories: Global Evidence on Bullying Perpetration and Victimization (2001–2014)," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:100:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225001230
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235225001230
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102474?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei-Hsuan Lo-Ciganic & Julie M Donohue & Eric G Hulsey & Susan Barnes & Yuan Li & Courtney C Kuza & Qingnan Yang & Jeanine Buchanich & James L Huang & Christina Mair & Debbie L Wilson & Walid F Gellad, 2021. "Integrating human services and criminal justice data with claims data to predict risk of opioid overdose among Medicaid beneficiaries: A machine-learning approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Reid, Joan A. & Beauregard, Eric, 2020. "Exploring a machine learning approach: Predicting death in sexual assault," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Guido Vittorio Travaini & Federico Pacchioni & Silvia Bellumore & Marta Bosia & Francesco De Micco, 2022. "Machine Learning and Criminal Justice: A Systematic Review of Advanced Methodology for Recidivism Risk Prediction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-13, August.
    4. N. Tollenaar & P. G. M. van der Heijden, 2013. "Which method predicts recidivism best?: a comparison of statistical, machine learning and data mining predictive models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 176(2), pages 565-584, February.
    5. Richard A. Berk & Susan B. Sorenson & Geoffrey Barnes, 2016. "Forecasting Domestic Violence: A Machine Learning Approach to Help Inform Arraignment Decisions," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 94-115, March.
    6. Jon Kleinberg & Himabindu Lakkaraju & Jure Leskovec & Jens Ludwig & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2018. "Human Decisions and Machine Predictions," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 133(1), pages 237-293.
    7. Jon Pareliussen & Christophe André & Hyunjeong Hwang, 2019. "Improving school results and equity in compulsory education in Sweden," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1587, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas A. Loughran & Megan Augustyn & Mauri Matsuda & Kimberly L. Henry, 2024. "Prognosticating Offending in Early Adulthood: How Early Can We Predict?," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 40(1), pages 99-129, March.
    2. Richard Berk, 2019. "Accuracy and Fairness for Juvenile Justice Risk Assessments," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), pages 175-194, March.
    3. Eli Ben-Michael & D. James Greiner & Melody Huang & Kosuke Imai & Zhichao Jiang & Sooahn Shin, 2024. "Does AI help humans make better decisions? A statistical evaluation framework for experimental and observational studies," Papers 2403.12108, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    4. Daníelsson, Jón & Macrae, Robert & Uthemann, Andreas, 2022. "Artificial intelligence and systemic risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    5. Yucheng Yang & Zhong Zheng & Weinan E, 2020. "Interpretable Neural Networks for Panel Data Analysis in Economics," Papers 2010.05311, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2020.
    6. Daniel Carter & Amelia Acker & Dan Sholler, 2021. "Investigative approaches to researching information technology companies," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(6), pages 655-666, June.
    7. Md Mohsan Khudri & Kang Keun Rhee & Mohammad Shabbir Hasan & Karar Zunaid Ahsan, 2023. "Predicting nutritional status for women of childbearing age from their economic, health, and demographic features: A supervised machine learning approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-31, May.
    8. Pilar Garcia‐Gomez & Pierre Koning & Owen O'Donnell & Carlos Riumalló‐Herl, 2025. "Selective exercise of discretion in disability insurance awards," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(3), pages 816-835, June.
    9. Ratzanyel Rincón, 2023. "Quarterly multidimensional poverty estimates in Mexico using machine learning algorithms/Estimaciones trimestrales de pobreza multidimensional en México mediante algoritmos de aprendizaje de máquina," Estudios Económicos, El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Económicos, vol. 38(1), pages 3-68.
    10. Klockmann, Victor & von Schenk, Alicia & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2022. "Artificial intelligence, ethics, and intergenerational responsibility," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 284-317.
    11. Daniel Graeber & Lorenz Meister & Carsten Schröder & Sabine Zinn, 2025. "Random Forests for Labor Market Analysis: Balancing Precision and Interpretability," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1230, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    12. Shan Huang & Michael Allan Ribers & Hannes Ullrich, 2021. "The Value of Data for Prediction Policy Problems: Evidence from Antibiotic Prescribing," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1939, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    13. Tamer Boyacı & Caner Canyakmaz & Francis de Véricourt, 2024. "Human and Machine: The Impact of Machine Input on Decision Making Under Cognitive Limitations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(2), pages 1258-1275, February.
    14. Daniel Bjorkegren & Joshua E. Blumenstock & Samsun Knight, 2020. "Manipulation-Proof Machine Learning," Papers 2004.03865, arXiv.org.
    15. Anthony Niblett, 2018. "Regulatory Reform in Ontario: Machine Learning and Regulation," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 507, March.
    16. Ekaterina Jussupow & Kai Spohrer & Armin Heinzl & Joshua Gawlitza, 2021. "Augmenting Medical Diagnosis Decisions? An Investigation into Physicians’ Decision-Making Process with Artificial Intelligence," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 713-735, September.
    17. Delogu, Marco & Lagravinese, Raffaele & Paolini, Dimitri & Resce, Giuliano, 2024. "Predicting dropout from higher education: Evidence from Italy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    18. Anja Garbely & Elias Steiner, 2023. "Understanding compliance with voluntary sustainability standards: a machine learning approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11209-11239, October.
    19. Hwanoong Lee & Kahyun Lee, 2025. "Identifying high-risk elderly for suicide using machine learning," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 69(4), pages 2467-2499, October.
    20. Jason Anastasopoulos & George J. Borjas & Gavin G. Cook & Michael Lachanski, 2018. "Job Vacancies, the Beveridge Curve, and Supply Shocks: The Frequency and Content of Help-Wanted Ads in Pre- and Post-Mariel Miami," NBER Working Papers 24580, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jcjust:v:100:y:2025:i:c:s0047235225001230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jcrimjus .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.