IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gnt/wpaper/24.html

Designing AI for Prosecutorial Governance: Case Prioritization and Statutory Oversight in Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • Fernanda Sobrino

    (School of Government and Public Transformation, Tecnológico de Monterrey)

  • Adolfo De Unánue T.

    (School of Government and Public Transformation, Tecnológico de Monterrey)

  • Edgar Hernández

    (School of Government and Public Transformation, Tecnológico de Monterrey)

  • Patricia Villa

    (School of Government and Public Transformation, Tecnológico de Monterrey)

  • Elena Villalobos

    (School of Government and Public Transformation, Tecnológico de Monterrey)

  • David Aké

    (School of Government and Public Transformation, Tecnológico de Monterrey)

  • Stephany Cisneros

    (School of Government and Public Transformation, Tecnológico de Monterrey)

  • Cristian Paul Camacho Osnay

    (Office of the Attorney General of the State of Zacatecas, Mexico)

  • Armando García Neri

    (Office of the Attorney General of the State of Zacatecas, Mexico)

  • Israel Hernández

    (Office of the Attorney General of the State of Zacatecas, Mexico)

Abstract

Prosecutors across Mexico face growing backlogs due to high caseloads and limited institutional capacity. This paper presents a machine learning (ML) system co-developed with the Zacatecas State Prosecutor’s Office to support internal case triage. Focusing on the Módulo de Atención Temprana (MAT)—the unit responsible for intake and early-stage case resolution—we train classification models on administrative data from the state’s digital case management system (PIE) to predict which open cases are likely to finalize within six months. The model generates weekly ranked lists of 300 cases to assist prosecutors in identifying actionable files. Using historical data from 2014 to 2024, we evaluate model performance under real-time constraints, finding that Random Forest classifiers achieve a mean Precision@300 of 0.74. The system emphasizes interpretability and operational feasibility, and we will test it via a randomized controlled trial. Our results suggest that data-driven prioritization can serve as a low-overhead tool for improving prosecutorial efficiency without disrupting existing workflows.

Suggested Citation

  • Fernanda Sobrino & Adolfo De Unánue T. & Edgar Hernández & Patricia Villa & Elena Villalobos & David Aké & Stephany Cisneros & Cristian Paul Camacho Osnay & Armando García Neri & Israel Hernández, 2026. "Designing AI for Prosecutorial Governance: Case Prioritization and Statutory Oversight in Mexico," Working Paper Series of the School of Government and Public Transformation 24, School of Governement and Public Transformation.
  • Handle: RePEc:gnt:wpaper:24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://egobiernoytp.tec.mx/sites/default/files/2026-02/ai_prosecutorial_governance_case_prioritization_mexico.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin Haibe-Kains & George Alexandru Adam & Ahmed Hosny & Farnoosh Khodakarami & Levi Waldron & Bo Wang & Chris McIntosh & Anna Goldenberg & Anshul Kundaje & Casey S. Greene & Tamara Broderick & Mi, 2020. "Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence," Nature, Nature, vol. 586(7829), pages 14-16, October.
    2. Matthew J. Salganik & Ian Lundberg & Alexander T. Kindel & Caitlin E. Ahearn & Khaled Al-Ghoneim & Abdullah Almaatouq & Drew M. Altschul & Jennie E. Brand & Nicole Bohme Carnegie & Ryan James Compton , 2020. "Measuring the predictability of life outcomes with a scientific mass collaboration," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(14), pages 8398-8403, April.
    3. Veale, Michael & Van Kleek, Max & Binns, Reuben, 2018. "Fairness and Accountability Design Needs for Algorithmic Support in High-Stakes Public Sector Decision-Making," SocArXiv 8kvf4, Center for Open Science.
    4. repec:osf:socarx:8kvf4_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Xinqin Liao & Weitao Song & Xiangyu Zhang & Chaoqun Yan & Tianliang Li & Hongliang Ren & Cunzhi Liu & Yongtian Wang & Yuanjin Zheng, 2020. "A bioinspired analogous nerve towards artificial intelligence," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    6. Bernd W. Wirtz & Jan C. Weyerer & Carolin Geyer, 2019. "Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector—Applications and Challenges," International Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(7), pages 596-615, May.
    7. Jon Kleinberg & Himabindu Lakkaraju & Jure Leskovec & Jens Ludwig & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2018. "Human Decisions and Machine Predictions," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 133(1), pages 237-293.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shengyu Cao & Ming Hu, 2026. "Collusive Pricing Under LLM," Papers 2601.01279, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    2. Marko D. Petrović & Tamara Gajić & Shakhislam Laiskhanov & Milan M. Radovanović & Željko Anđelković & Emin Atasoy & Dariga M. Khamitova, 2025. "Do Different Settings Matter in the Economically Sustainable Tourism Approach? A Comparative Study of Serbia, Kazakhstan, and Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-35, May.
    3. Juan Carlos Henao & Liliana López-Jiménez, 2021. "Disrupción tecnológica, transformación digital y sociedad. Tomo IV, Aires de revolución : nuevos desafíos tecnológicos a las instituciones económicas, financieras y organizacionales de nuestros tiempos," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1283.
    4. Vespignani, Joaquin & Smyth, Russell & Saadaoui, Jamel & Wang, Yitian, 2026. "Where Geopolitical Risk Binds: Stockpiling and AI as Complementary Strategies for Mitigating Supply Chain Risk in Critical Minerals," Working Papers 2026-01, University of Tasmania, Tasmanian School of Business and Economics.
    5. Weege, Maria & Zweigle, Tanja, 2025. "AI in marketing education: Capabilities required of marketers today," IU Discussion Papers - Marketing & Communication 2 (April 2025), IU International University of Applied Sciences.
    6. Plantinga, Paul, 2022. "Digital discretion and public administration in Africa: Implications for the use of artificial intelligence," SocArXiv 2r98w, Center for Open Science.
    7. Sunil Kumar Jauhar & Susmitha Harinath & Venkataraghavan Krishnaswamy & Sanjoy Kumar Paul, 2025. "Explainable artificial intelligence to improve the resilience of perishable product supply chains by leveraging customer characteristics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 354(1), pages 103-142, November.
    8. repec:osf:socarx:casb7_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Chuyi Luo & Liang Xia & Sung-Hugh Hong, 2025. "A Method for Selecting the Appropriate Source Domain Buildings for Building Energy Prediction in Transfer Learning: Using the Euclidean Distance and Pearson Coefficient," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-27, July.
    10. Daníelsson, Jón & Macrae, Robert & Uthemann, Andreas, 2022. "Artificial intelligence and systemic risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    11. Yucheng Yang & Zhong Zheng & Weinan E, 2020. "Interpretable Neural Networks for Panel Data Analysis in Economics," Papers 2010.05311, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2020.
    12. Daniel Carter & Amelia Acker & Dan Sholler, 2021. "Investigative approaches to researching information technology companies," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 72(6), pages 655-666, June.
    13. Md Mohsan Khudri & Kang Keun Rhee & Mohammad Shabbir Hasan & Karar Zunaid Ahsan, 2023. "Predicting nutritional status for women of childbearing age from their economic, health, and demographic features: A supervised machine learning approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(5), pages 1-31, May.
    14. Pilar Garcia‐Gomez & Pierre Koning & Owen O'Donnell & Carlos Riumalló‐Herl, 2025. "Selective exercise of discretion in disability insurance awards," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(3), pages 816-835, June.
    15. Ratzanyel Rincón, 2023. "Quarterly multidimensional poverty estimates in Mexico using machine learning algorithms/Estimaciones trimestrales de pobreza multidimensional en México mediante algoritmos de aprendizaje de máquina," Estudios Económicos, El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Económicos, vol. 38(1), pages 3-68.
    16. Klockmann, Victor & von Schenk, Alicia & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2022. "Artificial intelligence, ethics, and intergenerational responsibility," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 284-317.
    17. Daniel Graeber & Lorenz Meister & Carsten Schröder & Sabine Zinn, 2025. "Random Forests for Labor Market Analysis: Balancing Precision and Interpretability," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1230, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    18. Shan Huang & Michael Allan Ribers & Hannes Ullrich, 2021. "The Value of Data for Prediction Policy Problems: Evidence from Antibiotic Prescribing," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1939, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    19. Takaaki Onaga & Masaki Fujita & Yoshinobu Kano, 2024. "Contribution Analysis of Large Language Models and Data Augmentations for Person Names in Solving Legal Bar Examination at COLIEE 2023," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 123-143, April.
    20. Shivam Gupta & Shampy Kamboj & Surajit Bag, 2023. "Role of Risks in the Development of Responsible Artificial Intelligence in the Digital Healthcare Domain," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 2257-2274, December.
    21. Daniel Bjorkegren & Joshua E. Blumenstock & Samsun Knight, 2020. "Manipulation-Proof Machine Learning," Papers 2004.03865, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration
    • K42 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law
    • C38 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Classification Methdos; Cluster Analysis; Principal Components; Factor Analysis
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gnt:wpaper:24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Fabian Fuentes-Rivas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/emitemx.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.