IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p4985-d1667195.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do Different Settings Matter in the Economically Sustainable Tourism Approach? A Comparative Study of Serbia, Kazakhstan, and Hungary

Author

Listed:
  • Marko D. Petrović

    (Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić” SASA, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
    Department of Regional Economics and Geography, Faculty of Economics, Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 117198 Moscow, Russia)

  • Tamara Gajić

    (Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić” SASA, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Shakhislam Laiskhanov

    (Department of Science and Innovation, International Educational Corporation, Almaty 050043, Kazakhstan)

  • Milan M. Radovanović

    (Geographical Institute “Jovan Cvijić” SASA, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Željko Anđelković

    (Department of Geography and Tourism, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, University of Niš, 18000 Niš, Serbia)

  • Emin Atasoy

    (Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Education, Uludag University, 16059 Bursa, Turkey)

  • Dariga M. Khamitova

    (Department of Art and Art Management, Kazakh National Academy of Choreography, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

This study explores residents’ perceptions of tourism development with a particular emphasis on the economic dimension of sustainability, focusing on how economic benefits, costs, and related factors shape local support in Serbia, Kazakhstan, and Hungary. By analyzing perceived advantages and disadvantages, the study aims to assess the extent of local support for tourism and the moderating effects of travel frequency and contact with tourists. In parallel, tourist arrival forecasts for 2025–2030 provide context on the anticipated dynamics of tourism growth, with Hungary showing the highest projected increase. Using advanced statistical techniques, including Multi-Group Analysis (MGA), structural equation modeling (SEM), and machine learning methods, key factors driving tourism support were identified. Positive perceptions of economic benefits and cultural identification significantly enhance support for tourism, while perceived costs act as inhibitors. The application of Random Forest and XGBoost (version 1.7.x) models improved predictive accuracy, while K-means clustering and principal component analysis (PCA) clarified relationships among constructs. The findings provide actionable insights for developing sustainable tourism strategies that prioritize economic outcomes and community engagement, particularly in culturally and economically diverse settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Marko D. Petrović & Tamara Gajić & Shakhislam Laiskhanov & Milan M. Radovanović & Željko Anđelković & Emin Atasoy & Dariga M. Khamitova, 2025. "Do Different Settings Matter in the Economically Sustainable Tourism Approach? A Comparative Study of Serbia, Kazakhstan, and Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-35, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4985-:d:1667195
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4985/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4985/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Woosnam, Kyle M. & Draper, Jason & Jiang, Jingxian (Kelly) & Aleshinloye, Kayode D. & Erul, Emrullah, 2018. "Applying self-perception theory to explain residents' attitudes about tourism development through travel histories," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 357-368.
    2. Maurício Gonçalves e Silva & Paula Remoaldo & Marília Luíza Peluso, 2025. "Human values and tourism perception: a new approach in residents’ perceptions," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3), pages 353-358, February.
    3. Antoine Dechezleprêtre & Adrien Fabre & Tobias Kruse & Bluebery Planterose & Ana Sanchez Chico & Stefanie Stantcheva, 2025. "Fighting Climate Change: International Attitudes toward Climate Policies," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 115(4), pages 1258-1300, April.
    4. Benjamin Haibe-Kains & George Alexandru Adam & Ahmed Hosny & Farnoosh Khodakarami & Levi Waldron & Bo Wang & Chris McIntosh & Anna Goldenberg & Anshul Kundaje & Casey S. Greene & Tamara Broderick & Mi, 2020. "Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence," Nature, Nature, vol. 586(7829), pages 14-16, October.
    5. Gordon Wetzstein & Aydogan Ozcan & Sylvain Gigan & Shanhui Fan & Dirk Englund & Marin Soljačić & Cornelia Denz & David A. B. Miller & Demetri Psaltis, 2020. "Inference in artificial intelligence with deep optics and photonics," Nature, Nature, vol. 588(7836), pages 39-47, December.
    6. Reza Saleki & Farzana Quoquab & Jihad Mohammad, 2021. "To buy or not to buy organic food: evaluating the moderating effect of gender using PLS-MGA," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(1), pages 106-127.
    7. Hugo Pinto & Miriam Barboza & Carla Nogueira, 2025. "Perceptions and Behaviors Concerning Tourism Degrowth and Sustainable Tourism: Latent Dimensions and Types of Tourists," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-24, January.
    8. Abdul Hafaz Ngah & Nurul Izni Kamalrulzaman & Mohamad Firdaus Halimi Mohamad & Rosyati Abdul Rashid & Nor Omaima Harun & Nur Asma Ariffin & Noor Azuan Abu Osman, 2023. "Do Science and Social Science Differ? Multi-Group Analysis (MGA) of the Willingness to Continue Online Learning," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 2957-2980, August.
    9. Huiyue Liu & Qiancai Tan & Huiping Mai, 2023. "Stress-Buffering Effects of Social Support on Tourism Employees during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Moderated Mediation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Xinqin Liao & Weitao Song & Xiangyu Zhang & Chaoqun Yan & Tianliang Li & Hongliang Ren & Cunzhi Liu & Yongtian Wang & Yuanjin Zheng, 2020. "A bioinspired analogous nerve towards artificial intelligence," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.
    11. Samira Roudi & Huseyin Arasli & Seyi Saint Akadiri, 2019. "New insights into an old issue – examining the influence of tourism on economic growth: evidence from selected small island developing states," Current Issues in Tourism, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(11), pages 1280-1300, July.
    12. Qihang Qiu & Yifan Zuo & Mu Zhang, 2022. "Intangible Cultural Heritage in Tourism: Research Review and Investigation of Future Agenda," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    13. Isbandriyati Mutmainah & Iis Anisa Yulia & Foni Agus Setiawan & Aditya Sugih Setiawan & Immas Nurhayati & Bambang Hengky Rainanto & Sri Harini & Endri Endri, 2025. "Analysis of Factors Influencing Digital Transformation of Tourism Villages: Evidence from Bogor, Indonesia," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-23, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan Carlos Henao & Liliana López-Jiménez, 2021. "Disrupción tecnológica, transformación digital y sociedad. Tomo IV, Aires de revolución : nuevos desafíos tecnológicos a las instituciones económicas, financieras y organizacionales de nuestros tiempo," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, number 1283.
    2. Weege, Maria & Zweigle, Tanja, 2025. "AI in marketing education: Capabilities required of marketers today," IU Discussion Papers - Marketing & Communication 2 (April 2025), IU International University of Applied Sciences.
    3. Plantinga, Paul, 2022. "Digital discretion and public administration in Africa: Implications for the use of artificial intelligence," SocArXiv 2r98w, Center for Open Science.
    4. repec:osf:socarx:casb7_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Chuyi Luo & Liang Xia & Sung-Hugh Hong, 2025. "A Method for Selecting the Appropriate Source Domain Buildings for Building Energy Prediction in Transfer Learning: Using the Euclidean Distance and Pearson Coefficient," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-27, July.
    6. Garrod Brian & Almeida António & Machado Luiz, 2023. "Modelling of nonlinear asymmetric effects of changes in tourism on economic growth in an autonomous small-island economy," European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 154-172, December.
    7. König, Tobias & Schmacker, Renke, 2025. "Preferences regarding behavioral policy: Attitudes toward sugary beverage taxes in the US," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2025-201, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    8. Sterner, Thomas & Ewald, Jens & Sterner, Erik, 2024. "Economists and the climate," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    9. Jorge M. Uribe, 2023. ""Fiscal crises and climate change"," IREA Working Papers 202303, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Feb 2023.
    10. Ingar Haaland & Christopher Roth & Stefanie Stantcheva & Johannes Wohlfart, 2024. "Measuring What Is Top of Mind," CEBI working paper series 24-10, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics. The Center for Economic Behavior and Inequality (CEBI).
    11. Uktam Umurzakov & Shakhnoza Tosheva & Raufhon Salahodjaev, 2023. "Tourism and Sustainable Economic Development: Evidence from Belt and Road Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(1), pages 503-516, March.
    12. Lackner, Teresa & Fierro, Luca E. & Mellacher, Patrick, 2025. "Opinion dynamics meet agent-based climate economics: An integrated analysis of carbon taxation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    13. Linden, Jules & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Sologon, Denisa M., 2024. "The many faces of carbon tax regressivity—Why carbon taxes are not always regressive for the same reason," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    14. Takaaki Onaga & Masaki Fujita & Yoshinobu Kano, 2024. "Contribution Analysis of Large Language Models and Data Augmentations for Person Names in Solving Legal Bar Examination at COLIEE 2023," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 123-143, April.
    15. Eckert, Linus & Schemel, Benjamin & Stagl, Sigrid, 2024. "Gesellschaftliche Akzeptanz von Klimaschutzmaßnahmen: Erste Einblicke in die Ergebnisse," Ecological Economic Papers 47/2024, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    16. H. H. Zhu & J. Zou & H. Zhang & Y. Z. Shi & S. B. Luo & N. Wang & H. Cai & L. X. Wan & B. Wang & X. D. Jiang & J. Thompson & X. S. Luo & X. H. Zhou & L. M. Xiao & W. Huang & L. Patrick & M. Gu & L. C., 2022. "Space-efficient optical computing with an integrated chip diffractive neural network," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, December.
    17. Jakub Sokołowski & Piotr Lewandowski & Jan Frankowski, 2023. "How to Prevent Yellow Vests? Evaluating Preferences for a Carbon Tax with a Discrete Choice Experiment," IBS Working Papers 03/2023, Instytut Badan Strukturalnych.
    18. Campiglio, Emanuele & Lamperti, Francesco & Terranova, Roberta, 2024. "Believe me when I say green! Heterogeneous expectations and climate policy uncertainty," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    19. Cevat Giray Aksoy & Jose Maria Barrero & Nicholas Bloom & Steven J. Davis & Mathias Dolls & Pablo Zarate, 2022. "Working from Home Around the World," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 53(2 (Fall)), pages 281-360.
    20. Yunxiang Ge & Cheng Lu & Han Gao, 2023. "Constructing an Indicator System for Cultural Sustainability in Chinese Cities under the Objective of Urban Renewal and Capability Measurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-23, September.
    21. Ilyana Kuziemko & Nicolas Longuet-Marx & Suresh Naidu, 2024. "“Compensate the Losers?†Economic Policy and Partisan Realignment in the US," Working Papers 321, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Center for Economic Policy Studies..

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4985-:d:1667195. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.