IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v99y2019icp398-404.html

Attachment styles and electronic word of mouth (e-WOM) adoption on social networking sites

Author

Listed:
  • Park, Min-Sook
  • Shin, Jong-Kuk
  • Ju, Yong

Abstract

It becomes more and more important for marketers to understand why individuals adopt electronic word-of-mouth (e-WOM) on social networking sites. This paper aims to understand the social networking sites users e-WOM adoption based on the attachment theory. Attachment avoidance, attachment anxiety, and their interaction effects are tested to understand the direct effect on e-WOM adoption. Moreover, the mediating effect of self-surveillance and social surveillance between attachment styles and e-WOM adoption has also evaluated. The results indicated that attachment avoidance has an adverse effect on e-WOM adoption; attachment anxiety and the interactive effect have a positive effect on e-WOM adoption. Self-surveillance and social surveillance have a mediating effect between two attachment dimensions (avoidance and anxiety) and e-WOM adoption, and the interaction of anxiety and avoidance mediated by social surveillance.

Suggested Citation

  • Park, Min-Sook & Shin, Jong-Kuk & Ju, Yong, 2019. "Attachment styles and electronic word of mouth (e-WOM) adoption on social networking sites," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 398-404.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:99:y:2019:i:c:p:398-404
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.09.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296317303387
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.09.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Min-Sook Park & Jong-Kuk Shin & Yong Ju, 2014. "Social networking atmosphere and online retailing," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 89-107, January.
    2. Yubo Chen & Jinhong Xie, 2005. "Third-Party Product Review and Firm Marketing Strategy," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 218-240, February.
    3. Seong Do Cho & Kyoungeun Kim & Daekwan Kim, 2015. "Antecedents and effects of customer-service employee attachments on customer-company identification and word-of-mouth: the case of Cheong in South Korea," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 91-105, January.
    4. Jong Kuk Shin & Minsook Park, 2014. "Mediating effect of store attachment in formation of store emotions and patronage through art and culture sponsorship in retailing," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 441-452, September.
    5. Kleine, Susan Schultz & Kleine, Robert E, III & Allen, Chris T, 1995. "How Is a Possession "Me" or "Not Me"? Characterizing Types and an Antecedent of Material Possession Attachment," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 22(3), pages 327-343, December.
    6. Filieri, Raffaele, 2015. "What makes online reviews helpful? A diagnosticity-adoption framework to explain informational and normative influences in e-WOM," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1261-1270.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ma, Guanhua & Ma, Junhua & Li, Hao & Wang, Yiming & Wang, Zhaohua & Zhang, Bin, 2022. "Customer behavior in purchasing energy-saving products: Big data analytics from online reviews of e-commerce," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    2. Affifa Sardar & Amir Manzoor & Khurram Adeel Shaikh & Liaqat Ali, 2021. "An Empirical Examination of the Impact of eWom Information on Young Consumers’ Online Purchase Intention: Mediating Role of eWom Information Adoption," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    3. Kim, Hyojung & Yoo, Jungmin & Park, Minjung, 2025. "Metaverse friends with social benefits: Effects of social identity on the intention to purchase virtual products through site attachment, user engagement, and public self-consciousness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    4. Suparna Dhar & Indranil Bose, 2023. "Corporate Users’ Attachment to Social Networking Sites: Examining the Role of Social Capital and Perceived Benefits," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1197-1217, June.
    5. Hongjie Sun & Xiaoting Xu & Xiaobing Xu, 2025. "When social media sharing backfires: how early sharing intention shapes divergent consumer choices," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 669-687, September.
    6. Mengmeng Wang & Wenjie Yang, 2021. "What Drives Rural Consumers to Change E-Commerce Attitude and Adopt E-Commerce through the Moderating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in an Emerging Market? An Empirical Investigation in the C," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Kejun Lin & Wenbin Du & Shixin Yang & Chang Liu & Sanggyun Na, 2023. "The Effects of Social Media Communication and e-WOM on Brand Equity: The Moderating Roles of Product Involvement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-19, April.
    8. Muhammad Junaid Shahid Hasni & Faruk Anıl Konuk & Tobias Otterbring, 2025. "Anxious Altruism: Virtue Signaling Mediates the Impact of Attachment Style on Consumers’ Green Purchase Behavior and Prosocial Responses," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 196(3), pages 603-637, January.
    9. Deriu, Valerio & Pozharliev, Rumen & De Angelis, Matteo, 2024. "How trust and attachment styles jointly shape job candidates’ AI receptivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Essig, Richard A., 2024. "The preference for users to experts in the domain of online product ratings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. Jong Kuk Shin & Minsook Park, 2014. "Mediating effect of store attachment in formation of store emotions and patronage through art and culture sponsorship in retailing," Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 441-452, September.
    3. Onofrei, George & Filieri, Raffaele & Kennedy, Lorraine, 2022. "Social media interactions, purchase intention, and behavioural engagement: The mediating role of source and content factors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 100-112.
    4. Kim, Juran & Kang, Seungmook & Bae, Joonheui, 2022. "Human likeness and attachment effect on the perceived interactivity of AI speakers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 797-804.
    5. Yucheng Zhang & Zhiling Wang & Lin Xiao & Lijun Wang & Pei Huang, 2023. "Discovering the evolution of online reviews: A bibliometric review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Shobhit Kakaria & Aline Simonetti & Enrique Bigne, 2024. "Interaction between extrinsic and intrinsic online review cues: perspectives from cue utilization theory," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 2469-2497, December.
    7. Rosillo-Díaz, Elena & Muñoz-Rosas, Juan Francisco & Blanco-Encomienda, Francisco Javier, 2024. "Impact of heuristic–systematic cues on the purchase intention of the electronic commerce consumer through the perception of product quality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    8. Dan Ke & Heci Zhang & Ning Yu & Yanbin Tu, 2021. "Who will stay with the brand after posting non-5/5 rating of purchase? An empirical study of online consumer repurchase behavior," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 405-437, June.
    9. Muhammad Rifki Shihab & Audry Pragita Putri, 2019. "Negative online reviews of popular products: understanding the effects of review proportion and quality on consumers’ attitude and intention to buy," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 159-187, March.
    10. Monic Sun, 2012. "How Does the Variance of Product Ratings Matter?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(4), pages 696-707, April.
    11. Russell Belk, 2007. "Why Not Share Rather Than Own?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 611(1), pages 126-140, May.
    12. Reo Song & Sungha Jang & Gangshu (George) Cai, 2016. "Does advertising indicate product quality? Evidence from prelaunch and postlaunch advertising in the movie industry," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 791-804, December.
    13. Ruvio, Ayalla A. & Shoham, Aviv, 2016. "Consumer arrogance: Scale development and validation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 3989-3997.
    14. Zheng, Lili, 2021. "The classification of online consumer reviews: A systematic literature review and integrative framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 226-251.
    15. F. Magnoni & Elyette Roux, 2011. "Stretching a luxury brand down: An experimental study of core brand dilution effects," Post-Print halshs-00644899, HAL.
    16. Book, Laura A. & Tanford, Sarah & Chang, Wen, 2018. "Customer reviews are not always informative: The impact of effortful versus heuristic processing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 272-280.
    17. Bag, Sujoy & Tiwari, Manoj Kumar & Chan, Felix T.S., 2019. "Predicting the consumer's purchase intention of durable goods: An attribute-level analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 408-419.
    18. Hollenbeck, Candice R. & Peters, Cara & Zinkhan, George M., 2008. "Retail Spectacles and Brand Meaning: Insights from a Brand Museum Case Study," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 334-353.
    19. Pooja Katyal & Reetika Sehgal, 2025. "Unraveling the impact of online consumer reviews on consumer buying behavior," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 16(1), pages 330-345, January.
    20. Yabing Jiang & Hong Guo, 2015. "Design of Consumer Review Systems and Product Pricing," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 714-730, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:99:y:2019:i:c:p:398-404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.