IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/anname/v611y2007i1p126-140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why Not Share Rather Than Own?

Author

Listed:
  • Russell Belk

    (Schulich School of Business at York University)

Abstract

Sharing is an alternative form of distribution to commodity exchange and gift giving. Compared to these alternative modes, sharing can foster community, save resources, and create certain synergies. Yet outside of our immediate families, we do little sharing. Even within the family, there is increased privatization. This article addresses impediments to sharing as well as incentives that may encourage more sharing of both tangible and intangible goods. Two recent developments, the Internet and intellectual property rights doctrines, are locked in a battle that will do much to determine the future of sharing. Businesses may lead the way with virtual corporations outsourcing the bulk of their operations. Whether virtual consumers sharing some of their major possessions are a viable counterpart remains an open question.

Suggested Citation

  • Russell Belk, 2007. "Why Not Share Rather Than Own?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 611(1), pages 126-140, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:611:y:2007:i:1:p:126-140
    DOI: 10.1177/0002716206298483
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716206298483
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0002716206298483?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sherry, John F, Jr, 1983. "Gift Giving in Anthropological Perspective," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 10(2), pages 157-168, September.
    2. Hal R. Varian, 2000. "Buying, Sharing and Renting Information Goods," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 473-488, December.
    3. Inglehart, Ronald, 1981. "Post-Materialism in an Environment of Insecurity," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 75(4), pages 880-900, December.
    4. McGraw, A Peter & Tetlock, Philip E & Kristel, Orie V, 2003. "The Limits of Fungibility: Relational Schemata and the Value of Things," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(2), pages 219-229, September.
    5. Belk, Russell W & Coon, Gregory S, 1993. "Gift Giving as Agapic Love: An Alternative to the Exchange Paradigm Based on Dating Experiences," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 20(3), pages 393-417, December.
    6. Webley, P. & Lea, S. E. G. & Portalska, R., 1983. "The unacceptability of money as a gift," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 223-238.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bart Cammaerts, 2011. "Disruptive sharing in a digital age: rejecting neoliberalism?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 32857, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Camilla Lenzi & Elisa Panzera, 2022. "The Geography Of The Sharing Economy In Europe," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, DECEMBER.
    3. Rodrigo Gandia & Fabio Antonialli & Julia Oliveira & Lucas Patrício & Joel Sugano & Isabelle Nicolaï & Izabela Cardoso Oliveira, 2021. "Casual Carpooling as a Strategy to Implement Mobility-as-a-Service schemes in a Developing Country," Post-Print hal-03687581, HAL.
    4. Valentin Clemens & Christopher Albert Sabel & Johann Nils Foege & Stephan Nüesch, 2022. "System Design Choice in the Sharing Economy: How Different Institutional Logics Drive Consumer Perception and Consumers’ Intention to Use Sharing Systems," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 201-234, June.
    5. Charles Touma & Anita D. Bhappu, 2023. "To Share or Not to Share: A Framework for Understanding Coworker Collaborative Consumption," Merits, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-14, April.
    6. Saubhagya Bhalla, 2023. "Motivations and Constraints of Collaborative Consumption, Testing the Mediating Role of Attitude and nature of Trust," Vision, , vol. 27(2), pages 189-201, April.
    7. Ebru Tumer Kabadayi & Nilsah Cavdar Aksoy & Nihal Yazici & Alev Kocak Alan, 2022. "Airbnb as a sharing economy-enabled digital service platform: The power of motivational factors and the moderating role of experience," Tourism Economics, , vol. 28(3), pages 748-771, May.
    8. Jeff Muldoon & Eric W. Liguori & Shelby Solomon & Josh Bendickson, 2023. "Technological Innovation and the expansion of Entrepreneurship Ecosystems," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1789-1808, July.
    9. Johanna F. Gollnhofer & Katharina Hellwig & Felicitas Morhart, 2016. "Fair Is Good, but What Is Fair? Negotiations of Distributive Justice in an Emerging Nonmonetary Sharing Model," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(2), pages 226-245.
    10. Kang, Jingoo & Kang, Minwook, 2022. "Durable goods as commitment devices under quasi-hyperbolic discounting," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    11. Chapman, Alexis & Dilmperi, Athina, 2022. "Luxury brand value co-creation with online brand communities in the service encounter," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 902-921.
    12. Abrate, Graziano & Sainaghi, Ruggero & Mauri, Aurelio G., 2022. "Dynamic pricing in Airbnb: Individual versus professional hosts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 191-199.
    13. Belezas, Fernando & Daniel, Ana Dias, 2023. "Innovation in the sharing economy: A systematic literature review and research framework," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    14. Bozana Zekan & Ulrich Gunter, 2022. "Zooming into Airbnb listings of European cities: Further investigation of the sector’s competitiveness," Tourism Economics, , vol. 28(3), pages 772-794, May.
    15. Khalek, Sk Abu & Chakraborty, Anirban, 2023. "Access or collaboration? A typology of sharing economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PA).
    16. Meng-Xun Ho & Hideyoshi Yanagisawa, 2023. "Design for Well-Being and Sustainability: A Conceptual Framework of the Peer-to-Peer Sharing and Reuse Platform in the Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, May.
    17. Anna Y. Veretennikova & Daria A. Selezneva, 2023. "Development of Regulatory Strategies in the Sharing Economy: The Application of Game Theory," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Anne Bäro & Felix Toepler & Timo Meynhardt & Vivek K. Velamuri, 2022. "Participating in the sharing economy: The role of individual characteristics," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(8), pages 3715-3735, December.
    19. Yanwen Ruan & Yingjiao Xu & Hanna Lee, 2022. "Consumer Motivations for Luxury Fashion Rental: A Second-Order Factor Analysis Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
    20. Emeka Ndaguba & Cina Van Zyl, 2023. "Professionalizing Sharing Platforms for Sustainable Growth in the Hospitality Sector: Insights Gained through Hierarchical Linear Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-24, May.
    21. Mariam Mohsin & Fizzah Khalid Butt, 2022. "Digitalisation and Disruption— Consequences for Business and Theory," PIDE-Working Papers 2022:14, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng, Andong & Meloy, Margaret G. & Polman, Evan, 2021. "Picking Gifts for Picky People," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 191-206.
    2. Cavanaugh, Lisa A. & Gino, Francesca & Fitzsimons, Gavan J., 2015. "When doing good is bad in gift giving: Mis-predicting appreciation of socially responsible gifts," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 178-189.
    3. Sandrine Frémeaux & Grant Michelson, 2011. ""No Strings Attached": Welcoming the Existential Gift in Business," Post-Print hal-00797037, HAL.
    4. Cruz-Cárdenas, Jorge & del Val Núñez, M. Teresa, 2016. "Clothing disposition by gifting: Benefits for consumers and new consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 4975-4979.
    5. Guglielmo Faldetta, 2011. "The Logic of Gift and Gratuitousness in Business Relationships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 100(1), pages 67-77, March.
    6. Johanna F. Gollnhofer & Katharina Hellwig & Felicitas Morhart, 2016. "Fair Is Good, but What Is Fair? Negotiations of Distributive Justice in an Emerging Nonmonetary Sharing Model," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(2), pages 226-245.
    7. Chen, Ning & Petersen, Francine E. & Lowrey, Tina M., 2022. "The effect of altruistic gift giving on self-indulgence in affordable luxury," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 84-94.
    8. Joo, Young-Hyuck & Kim, Yunsik & Yang, Suk-Joon, 2011. "Valuing customers for social network services," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(11), pages 1239-1244.
    9. Booth, Jonathan E. & Park, Kyoung Won & Glomb, Theresa M., 2009. "Employer-supported volunteering benefits: gift exchange among employers, employees, and volunteer organizations," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 30020, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    10. Ertimur, Burçak & Muñoz, Caroline & Hutton, James G., 2015. "Regifting: A multi-perspective processual overview," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(9), pages 1997-2004.
    11. Ramon Silva Leite & Sérgio Cruz Passos & Marcelo de Rezende Pinto, 2020. "Personal values and gift giving act: a proposed connection," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, vol. 36(155), pages 218-228, June.
    12. Bernard Cova & Eric Remy, 2014. "Consumption Seen From the Gift: State of the Art and Prospective [La consommation en clé de don : état des lieux rétrospectif et prospectif]," Post-Print hal-01581986, HAL.
    13. Vanhamme, Joëlle & de Bont, Cees J.P.M., 2008. "“Surprise Gift” Purchases: Customer Insights from the Small Electrical Appliances Market," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 354-369.
    14. Morvinski, Coby & Shani, Yaniv, 2022. "Misaligned mindsets between borrowers and lenders of small interpersonal loans," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    15. Reshadi, Farnoush, 2023. "Failing to give the gift of improvement: When and why givers withhold self-improvement gifts," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    16. Schiffman, Leon G. & Cohn, Deborah Y., 2009. "Are they playing by the same rules? A consumer gifting classification of marital dyads," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(11), pages 1054-1062, November.
    17. Olsen, Barbara, 2012. "Reflexive introspection on sharing gifts and shaping stories," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(4), pages 467-474.
    18. Sandrine Frémeaux & Grant Michelson, 2011. "‘No Strings Attached’: Welcoming the Existential Gift in Business," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 99(1), pages 63-75, March.
    19. Vanhamme, J. & de Bont, C.J.P.M., 2005. "“Surprise Gift” Purchases of Small Electric Appliances: A Pilot Study," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2005-081-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    20. Carolina Rezende Pereira & Suzane Strehlau, 2016. "Social Bond Development Through Continuous Indebtedness," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 241-259, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:anname:v:611:y:2007:i:1:p:126-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.