IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v195y2025ics0148296325002310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mutual scrutiny and information exchange: Uncovering R&D Partners’ impact on ESG performance in the biopharmaceutical industry

Author

Listed:
  • Hu, Yahan
  • Zheng, Qinqin

Abstract

Advocacy for environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance is shaping the biopharmaceutical industry. Nevertheless, the impact of certain stakeholder groups within the industry, such as research and development (R&D) partners, remains largely underexplored. As risk and resources are two key dimensions in understanding R&D alliance activities, we propose that R&D partners may influence focal firms’ ESG performance through two forces: mutual scrutiny driven by risk considerations and information exchange reflecting resource access. Our investigation of strategic R&D alliances in the global biopharmaceutical industry from 2001 to 2020 supports the proposed enhancement effect of R&D partnerships on ESG performance. Moreover, this effect is stronger when focal firms perceive R&D partners as a more salient stakeholder group. Our study contributes to ESG research by integrating stakeholder theory with the strategic alliance literature and emphasising the non-financial effects of interorganisational relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Hu, Yahan & Zheng, Qinqin, 2025. "Mutual scrutiny and information exchange: Uncovering R&D Partners’ impact on ESG performance in the biopharmaceutical industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:195:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325002310
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115408
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325002310
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115408?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:195:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325002310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.