IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v122y2021icp293-303.html

Collective market shaping by competitors and its contribution to market resilience

Author

Listed:
  • Beninger, Stefanie
  • Francis, June N.P.

Abstract

Employing an inductive approach, we found that competitors engage in market shaping, where they actively change their market through their purposeful actions. These competitors shape their market from one characterized by competition to one of collaboration when facing disturbances, ultimately contributing to market resilience, with benefits to market actors. They achieve this through engaging in unique forms of work, which we have called ‘resilience work’ and its three associated practices, namely meshing, pooling, and deploying. The competitors engage in these practices, which provide for and deploy communally pooled resources across their cultivated web of meshed relationships in the face of disturbances. The findings, which provide a model of market resilience, contribute to marketing’s emerging knowledge of competitors’ collective actions with respect to market shaping, while delineating an important outcome of market shaping, that of resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Beninger, Stefanie & Francis, June N.P., 2021. "Collective market shaping by competitors and its contribution to market resilience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 293-303.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:122:y:2021:i:c:p:293-303
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296320305816
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pereira, Carla Roberta & Da Silva, Andrea Lago, . "Key Organisational Factors to Building Supply Chain Resilience: a Multiple Case Study of Buyers and Suppliers," Journal of Operations and Supply Chain Management (JOSCM), Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (FGV EAESP), vol. 8(2).
    2. Thomas Lawrence & Roy Suddaby & Bernard Leca, 2009. "Introduction: theorizing and studying institutional work," Post-Print hal-00576557, HAL.
    3. T. Lawrence & R. Suddaby & B. Leca, 2009. "Introduction : Theorizing and studying institutional work," Post-Print hal-00808954, HAL.
    4. Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Kraus, Sascha, 2013. "Innovation in knowledge-intensive industries: The double-edged sword of coopetition," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 2060-2070.
    5. Parker, Hamieda & Ameen, Khadija, 2018. "The role of resilience capabilities in shaping how firms respond to disruptions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 535-541.
    6. Martha S. Feldman & Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2011. "Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1240-1253, October.
    7. Suvi Nenonen & Kaj Storbacka & Charlotta Windahl, 2019. "Capabilities for market-shaping: triggering and facilitating increased value creation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 617-639, July.
    8. Michel Callon & Fabian Muniesa, 2005. "Economic markets as calculative collective devices," Post-Print halshs-00087477, HAL.
    9. Abhijit V. Banerjee & Esther Duflo, 2007. "The Economic Lives of the Poor," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 21(1), pages 141-168, Winter.
    10. Polsa, Pia, 2013. "The crossover-dialog approach: The importance of multiple methods for international business," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 288-297.
    11. Solomon, Robert C., 1994. "The Corporation as Community a Reply to Ed Hartman," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(3), pages 271-285, July.
    12. Jarvis, Cheryl Burke & MacKenzie, Scott B & Podsakoff, Philip M, 2003. "A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 30(2), pages 199-218, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Yifeng & Wang, Xinyu & Wei, Hongxu & Cao, Zhanhua, 2025. "Predicting retail shop number against roadside tree canopy shade: A national wide demonstration across 148 cities of China," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    2. Alexander Flaig & Daniel Kindström & Mikael Ottosson, 2021. "Market-shaping phases—a qualitative meta-analysis and conceptual framework," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 11(3), pages 354-374, December.
    3. Gebhardt, Maximilian & Spieske, Alexander & Kopyto, Matthias & Birkel, Hendrik, 2022. "Increasing global supply chains’ resilience after the COVID-19 pandemic: Empirical results from a Delphi study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 59-72.
    4. Beninger, Stefanie & Francis, June N.P., 2022. "Resources for business resilience in a COVID-19 world: A community-centric approach," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 227-238.
    5. Lin, Jiabao & Fan, Yuchen, 2024. "Seeking sustainable performance through organizational resilience: Examining the role of supply chain integration and digital technology usage," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    6. Napier, Elizabeth & Liu, Steven Y.H. & Liu, Jingting, 2024. "Adaptive strength: Unveiling a multilevel dynamic process model for organizational resilience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    7. Benmecheddal, Ahmed & Nguyen, Arthur & Özçaglar-Toulouse, Nil, 2023. "The micro dynamics of participation in collective market work: The case of Community-Supported Agriculture in France," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Liang Luo & Yetong Li & Wenjie Ma & Jianbo Rong & Jie Wei & Yong Cui & Tingting Qu, 2025. "Temporal–Spatial Dynamics and Collaborative Effects of Cropland Resilience in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-30, January.
    9. Iftikhar, Anas & Purvis, Laura & Giannoccaro, Ilaria, 2021. "A meta-analytical review of antecedents and outcomes of firm resilience," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 408-425.
    10. Ghizlane Errabi, 2023. "Reflections on resilience in the context of failure - Proposal of a Theoretical Framework," Post-Print hal-04623885, HAL.
    11. Syväri, Mariia & Tähtinen, Jaana & Nordberg-Davies, Sini, 2025. "Enacting ‘true business sustainability’ − Market shaping for environmental impact," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    12. Meinhold, Kathrin & Dumenu, William Kwadwo & Darr, Dietrich, 2022. "Connecting rural non-timber forest product collectors to global markets: The case of baobab (Adansonia digitata L.)," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    13. Antolín-López, Raquel & Jerez-Gómez, Pilar & Rengel-Rojas, Susana B., 2022. "Uncovering local communities’ motivational factors to partner with a nonprofit for social impact: A mixed-methods approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 564-583.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Möllering, Guido, 2010. "Collective market-making efforts at an engineering conference," MPIfG Discussion Paper 10/2, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    2. Martínez-Ferrero, Jennifer & García-Sánchez, Isabel-María, 2017. "Coercive, normative and mimetic isomorphism as determinants of the voluntary assurance of sustainability reports," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 102-118.
    3. Maximilian Benner, 2021. "System-level agency and its many shades: How to shape the system for path development?," PEGIS geo-disc-2021_10, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    4. repec:hal:journl:hal-00914824 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Healy John & Clarke Madeleine, 2020. "Implementing choice-based models of social service: The importance of involving people who use services in reform processes," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 68(4), pages 181-199, December.
    6. Arthur Gautier & Anne-Claire Pache & Imran Chowdhury, 2013. "Nonprofit Roles in For-profit Firms: The Institutionalization of Corporate Philanthropy in France," Working Papers hal-00914824, HAL.
    7. Böhling, Kathrin & Arzberger, Monika B., 2014. "New modes of governance in Bavaria's alpine forests: The ‘Mountain Forest Initiative’ at work," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 43-50.
    8. Victoria Johnson & Walter W. Powell, 2015. "Poisedness and Propagation: Organizational Emergence and the Transformation of Civic Order in 19th-Century New York City," NBER Working Papers 21011, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Syed Imran Saqib & Matthew MC Allen & Geoffrey Wood, 2022. "Lordly Management and its Discontents: ‘Human Resource Management’ in Pakistan," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(3), pages 465-484, June.
    10. Calabrò, Andrea & Conti, Elisa & Masè, Stefania, 2024. "Trapped in a “golden cage”! The legitimation of women leadership in family business," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 15(2).
    11. Giovanni Favero & Vladi Finotto & Anna Moretti, 2016. "Historicizing Entrepreneurial Imprinting: Sensitive Periods, Cognitive Frames and Resistance," Working Papers 10, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    12. Hilton, Joshua, 2025. "An integrated analysis of greenhush," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 4(2).
    13. Ertimur, Burçak & Chen, Steven, 2020. "Adaptation and diffusion of renovations: The case of the paleo diet," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 572-580.
    14. Garry D. Carnegie & Ann Martin-Sardesai & Lisa Marini & James Guthrie AM, 2021. "“Taming the black elephant”: assessing and managing the impacts of COVID-19 on public universities in Australia," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(6), pages 1783-1808, October.
    15. Rishikesan Parthiban & Israr Qureshi & Somprakash Bandyopadhyay & Babita Bhatt & Saravana Jaikumar, 2020. "Leveraging ICT to Overcome Complementary Institutional Voids: Insights from Institutional Work by a Social Enterprise to Help Marginalized," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 633-653, June.
    16. Rocha, Robson Sø & Granerud, Lise, 2011. "The search for legitimacy and organizational change: The agency of subordinated actors," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 261-272, September.
    17. Martin, Graeme & Farndale, Elaine & Paauwe, Jaap & Stiles, Philip G., 2016. "Corporate governance and strategic human resource management: Four archetypes and proposals for a new approach to corporate sustainability," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 22-35.
    18. Henk E. Meier & Marcel Reinold, 2018. "Immunizing Inefficient Field Frames for Mitigating Social Problems: The Institutional Work Behind the Technocratic Antidoping System," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(2), pages 21582440187, June.
    19. Orlikowski, Wanda J. & Scott, Susan V., 2015. "The algorithm and the crowd: considering the materiality of service innovation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 57601, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Davina Allen & Carl May, 2017. "Organizing Practice and Practicing Organization: An Outline of Translational Mobilization Theory," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(2), pages 21582440177, June.
    21. Gurd, Bruce & Helliar, Christine, 2017. "Looking for leaders: ‘Balancing’ innovation, risk and management control systems," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 91-102.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:122:y:2021:i:c:p:293-303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.