IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/irlaec/v83y2025ics0144818825000249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of antitrust enforcement on China’s digital platforms: Evidence from SAMR v. Alibaba

Author

Listed:
  • Khoo, Kenneth
  • Lai, Sinchit
  • Tian, Chuyue

Abstract

In this article, we explore the dynamics of antitrust enforcement in the Chinese e-commerce platform market by examining the landmark decision of SAMR v. Alibaba (2021) using an event study methodology. We find that the announcement of the antitrust investigation leads to a negative impact on Alibaba’s abnormal returns, while its competitors experience mixed outcomes, with some showing positive abnormal returns and others showing statistically insignificant changes. However, the announcement of the financial penalty triggers a positive stock market response for Alibaba and a negative response for its competitors, consistent with narratives suggesting that investors adjust their expectations based on new information revealed by the investigation. To assess the cumulative effects of the investigation on Alibaba, we conduct a long-horizon event study, which shows a 17 to 25% decline in Alibaba’s abnormal stock returns, with a relatively smaller decrease for its competitors. Additionally, using a synthetic control approach, we identify a 7 to 9% reduction in Alibaba’s gross profit margins compared to similar firms. Our findings reveal that the decision has a substantial impact on Alibaba’s profitability, with our estimates indicating an effect significantly larger than that observed in comparable studies in the EU and U.S.

Suggested Citation

  • Khoo, Kenneth & Lai, Sinchit & Tian, Chuyue, 2025. "The impact of antitrust enforcement on China’s digital platforms: Evidence from SAMR v. Alibaba," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:83:y:2025:i:c:s0144818825000249
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2025.106268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144818825000249
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irle.2025.106268?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:irlaec:v:83:y:2025:i:c:s0144818825000249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/irle .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.