IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v91y2009i3p286-296.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Affiliation with a primary care provider in New Zealand: Who is, who isn't

Author

Listed:
  • Jatrana, Santosh
  • Crampton, Peter

Abstract

Aims New Zealand has a mixed public-private funded primary care system. In the last decade, considerable effort has gone into reducing the financial barriers to primary care, with some targeting of greater public funding of practices in more deprived areas. In this paper we explore the association of socio-demographic factors with affiliation with a primary care provider (PCP), and specifically examine the association with deprivation. Affiliation refers to having a doctor, nurse or medical centre one could go to if need arises.Methods We used data from the third wave (2004-2005) of an ongoing 8-year panel study of 22,000 adults that includes a health add-on. This paper utilises demographic, socio-economic and health behaviour characteristics of those who reported affiliation with a PCP at wave 3. Affiliation itself was measured with the question: "do you have a doctor, nurse or medical centre you usually go to, if you need to see a doctor?" Logistic regression is used to determine the independent association of a range of socio-demographic factors with affiliation with a PCP.Results Of the total of 18,320 respondents, 1530 (8.3%) reported no affiliation with a PCP. The odds of affiliation was significantly lower for males compared to females (OR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.39-0.50), never married compared to currently married (OR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.41-0.57), Asians compared to New Zealand Europeans (OR 0.47, 95% CI: 0.38-0.57), current smokers compared to never smokers (OR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.68-0.91) and those with post-school education compared to no education (OR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.55-0.76) and higher for older adults aged 65 years and over compared to young adults aged 15-24 years old (OR 5.14, 95% CI: 3.59-7.36), those reporting poor self-assessed health compared to those reporting good health (OR 1.45, 95% CI: 1.06-1.98), and those reporting one or more co-morbid conditions compared to no co-morbid conditions (OR 2.02, 95% CI: 1.78-2.29). However, there was no significant difference in affiliation with a PCP between those living in the most deprived areas and the least deprived areas.Conclusions Affiliation to a PCP is a measure of potential access to primary care. Overall, our data provide some support for the hypothesis that people with high health needs have high rates of affiliation with a PCP (e.g., elderly, women, Maori and those in poor health). The results also suggest that current health policies in New Zealand, with their emphasis on a strong primary health care system, are ensuring that people with greater health care needs are affiliated with a PCP.

Suggested Citation

  • Jatrana, Santosh & Crampton, Peter, 2009. "Affiliation with a primary care provider in New Zealand: Who is, who isn't," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 286-296, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:91:y:2009:i:3:p:286-296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168-8510(08)00295-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Starfield, Barbara & Shi, Leiyu, 2002. "Policy relevant determinants of health: an international perspective," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 201-218, June.
    2. Kandrack, Mary-Anne & Grant, Karen R. & Segall, Alexander, 1991. "Gender differences in health related behaviour: Some unanswered questions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 579-590, January.
    3. Shi, L. & Starfield, B., 2001. "The effect of primary care physician supply and income inequality on mortality among Blacks and Whites in US metropolitan areas," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 91(8), pages 1246-1250.
    4. Nicole Watson & Mark Wooden, 2004. "The HILDA Survey Four Years On," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 37(3), pages 343-349, September.
    5. Green, Carla A & Pope, Clyde R, 1999. "Gender, psychosocial factors and the use of medical services: a longitudinal analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 48(10), pages 1363-1372, May.
    6. Grumbach, K. & Keane, D. & Bindman, A., 1993. "Primary care and public emergency department overcrowding," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 83(3), pages 372-378.
    7. Hayward, R.A. & Bernard, A.M. & Freeman, H.E. & Corey, C.R., 1991. "Regular source of ambulatory care and access to health services," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 81(4), pages 434-438.
    8. Katharina Hauck & Nigel Rice, 2004. "A longitudinal analysis of mental health mobility in Britain," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 13(10), pages 981-1001, October.
    9. Phongsavan, Philayrath & Chey, Tien & Bauman, Adrian & Brooks, Robert & Silove, Derrick, 2006. "Social capital, socio-economic status and psychological distress among Australian adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(10), pages 2546-2561, November.
    10. Starfield, B., 1996. "Public health and primary care: a framework for proposed linkages," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 86(10), pages 1365-1369.
    11. Popay, Jennie & Bartley, Mel & Owen, Charlie, 1993. "Gender inequalities in health: Social position, affective disorders and minor physical morbidity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 21-32, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomson, Michael, 2019. "Who had access to doctors before and after new universal capitated subsidies in New Zealand?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(8), pages 756-764.
    2. Jatrana, Santosh & Crampton, Peter, 2021. "Do financial barriers to access to primary health care increase the risk of poor health? Longitudinal evidence from New Zealand," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    3. McRae, Ian & Yen, Laurann & Gillespie, James & Douglas, Kirsty, 2011. "Patient affiliation with GPs in Australia—Who is and who is not and does it matter?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 16-23.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Koopmans, Gerrit T. & Lamers, Leida M., 2007. "Gender and health care utilization: The role of mental distress and help-seeking propensity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(6), pages 1216-1230, March.
    2. Propper, Carol & Rigg, John A. & Burgess, Simon, 2005. "Health supplier quality and the distribution of child health," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 6252, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Hong, Michael & Thind, Amardeep & Zaric, Gregory S. & Sarma, Sisira, 2020. "The impact of improved access to after-hours primary care on emergency department and primary care utilization: A systematic review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(8), pages 812-818.
    4. Shi, Leiyu & Macinko, James & Starfield, Barbara & Politzer, Robert & Xu, Jiahong, 2005. "Primary care, race, and mortality in US states," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 65-75, July.
    5. Jatrana, Santosh & Crampton, Peter, 2009. "Primary health care in New Zealand: Who has access?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 1-10, November.
    6. Horev, Tuvia & Pesis-Katz, Irena & Mukamel, Dana B., 2004. "Trends in geographic disparities in allocation of health care resources in the US," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 223-232, May.
    7. Ellen Bockstal & Broos Maenhout, 2019. "A study on the impact of prioritising emergency department arrivals on the patient waiting time," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 589-614, December.
    8. Robert Drago & Mark Wooden & David Black, 2009. "Long Work Hours: Volunteers and Conscripts," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 47(3), pages 571-600, September.
    9. David Cantarero & Marta Pascual, 2005. "Regional Differences In Health In Spain - An Empirical Analysis," ERSA conference papers ersa05p551, European Regional Science Association.
    10. Gardner, Jonathan & Oswald, Andrew J., 2007. "Money and mental wellbeing: A longitudinal study of medium-sized lottery wins," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 49-60, January.
    11. Klaus, Püschel & à lvaro, Téllez & Joaquín, Montero & Astrid, Brunner & Blanca, Peñaloza & María Paulina, Rojas & Fernando, Poblete & Tomás, Pantoja, 2013. "Hacia un nuevo modelo de atención primaria en salud: evaluación del proyecto de salud familiar Ancora U.C," Estudios Públicos, Centro de Estudios Públicos, vol. 0(130), pages 23-52.
    12. Fiona Cocker & Angela Martin & Jenn Scott & Alison Venn & Kristy Sanderson, 2013. "Psychological Distress, Related Work Attendance, and Productivity Loss in Small-to-Medium Enterprise Owner/Managers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-21, October.
    13. Hernández-Quevedo, Cristina & Jones, Andrew M. & Rice, Nigel, 2008. "Persistence in health limitations: A European comparative analysis," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 1472-1488, December.
    14. Adolf Kwadzo Dzampe & Shingo Takahashi, 2024. "Financial incentives and health provider behaviour: Evidence from a capitation policy in Ghana," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 333-344, February.
    15. Umut Oguzoglu, 2010. "Dynamics of work limitation and work in Australia," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(6), pages 656-669, June.
    16. Michelle Calvarese, 2015. "The Effect of Gender on Stress Factors: An Exploratory Study among University Students," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-8, November.
    17. Jones, Andrew M. & Wildman, John, 2008. "Health, income and relative deprivation: Evidence from the BHPS," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 308-324, March.
    18. Paul Contoyannis & Jinhu Li, 2017. "The dynamics of adolescent depression: an instrumental variable quantile regression with fixed effects approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 180(3), pages 907-922, June.
    19. Ekaterina Aleksandrova & Venera Bagranova & Christopher J Gerry, 2021. "The effect of health shocks on labour market outcomes in Russia [Ageing and unused capacity in Europe: is there an early retirement trap?]," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 45(6), pages 1319-1336.
    20. Carole Roan Gresenz & Jeanette A. Rogowski & Jose Escarce, 2004. "Healthcare Markets, the Safety Net and Access to Care Among the Uninsured," NBER Working Papers 10799, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:91:y:2009:i:3:p:286-296. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.