IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v103y2011i1p16-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient affiliation with GPs in Australia—Who is and who is not and does it matter?

Author

Listed:
  • McRae, Ian
  • Yen, Laurann
  • Gillespie, James
  • Douglas, Kirsty

Abstract

Recent government reports have proposed voluntary enrolment with general practitioners for certain groups of patients to enhance their continuity of care.

Suggested Citation

  • McRae, Ian & Yen, Laurann & Gillespie, James & Douglas, Kirsty, 2011. "Patient affiliation with GPs in Australia—Who is and who is not and does it matter?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 16-23.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:103:y:2011:i:1:p:16-23
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.09.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851010002630
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.09.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jatrana, Santosh & Crampton, Peter, 2009. "Affiliation with a primary care provider in New Zealand: Who is, who isn't," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(3), pages 286-296, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Breton, Mylaine & Smithman, Mélanie Ann & Kreindler, Sara A. & Jbilou, Jalila & Wong, Sabrina T. & Gard Marshall, Emily & Sasseville, Martin & Sutherland, Jason M. & Crooks, Valorie A. & Shaw, Jay & C, 2021. "Designing centralized waiting lists for attachment to a primary care provider: Considerations from a logic analysis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomson, Michael, 2019. "Who had access to doctors before and after new universal capitated subsidies in New Zealand?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(8), pages 756-764.
    2. Jatrana, Santosh & Crampton, Peter, 2021. "Do financial barriers to access to primary health care increase the risk of poor health? Longitudinal evidence from New Zealand," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:103:y:2011:i:1:p:16-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.