IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v179y2025ics1389934125001984.html

Exploring trade-offs in forest carbon storage: A cost-effectiveness study of Nordic forests and harvested wood products

Author

Listed:
  • Hu, Junhui
  • Jåstad, Eirik Ogner
  • Rørstad, Per Kristian

Abstract

Forest-based carbon sequestration plays an important role in climate mitigation, yet strategies vary widely in effectiveness and cost. This study compares two optimization goals in the Nordic forest sector, maximizing carbon in harvested wood products (HWP) and in avoided forest harvest plus HWPs. A partial equilibrium forest sector model (NFSM), combined with the method of Modeling to Generate Alternatives (MGA), is used to assess trade-offs between economic outcomes and carbon storage goals. Marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves are indirectly derived from the results. The analysis shows that maximizing avoided harvest and HWP achieves higher CO₂ gains at substantially lower costs (about €15–463/tCO₂) compared to only maximizing HWP (about €44–1200/tCO₂). In addition, the results reveal that carbon-focused strategies reshape industrial and trade dynamics in opposing ways. Bioeconomy-oriented approaches drive production and exports at higher carbon costs, while conservation-focused strategies reduce harvests and raise the risk of market leakage. These findings highlight the need for integrated policies that reduce reliance on product-based carbon storage while strengthening forest-based sequestration and storage.

Suggested Citation

  • Hu, Junhui & Jåstad, Eirik Ogner & Rørstad, Per Kristian, 2025. "Exploring trade-offs in forest carbon storage: A cost-effectiveness study of Nordic forests and harvested wood products," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:179:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125001984
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934125001984
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103619?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xavier Tanguay & Gatien Geraud Essoua Essoua & Ben Amor, 2021. "Attributional and consequential life cycle assessments in a circular economy with integration of a quality indicator: A case study of cascading wood products," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(6), pages 1462-1473, December.
    2. Latta, Gregory S. & Sjølie, Hanne K. & Solberg, Birger, 2013. "A review of recent developments and applications of partial equilibrium models of the forest sector," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 350-360.
    3. Sedjo, Roger A. & Sohngen, Brent & Mendelsohn, Robert, 2001. "Estimating Carbon Supply Curves for Global Forests and Other Land Uses," Discussion Papers 10663, Resources for the Future.
    4. Bjart Holtsmark, 2012. "Harvesting in boreal forests and the biofuel carbon debt," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 415-428, May.
    5. Chen, Yi-kuang & Kirkerud, Jon Gustav & Bolkesjø, Torjus Folsland, 2022. "Balancing GHG mitigation and land-use conflicts: Alternative Northern European energy system scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    6. Mustapha, Walid Fayez & Trømborg, Erik & Bolkesjø, Torjus Folsland, 2019. "Forest-based biofuel production in the Nordic countries: Modelling of optimal allocation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 45-54.
    7. Sampo Soimakallio & Tuomo Kalliokoski & Aleksi Lehtonen & Olli Salminen, 2021. "On the trade-offs and synergies between forest carbon sequestration and substitution," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-17, January.
    8. Brent Sohngen & Robert Mendelsohn & Roger Sedjo, 1999. "Forest Management, Conservation, and Global Timber Markets," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 81(1), pages 1-13.
    9. Luhas, Jukka & Mikkilä, Mirja & Kylkilahti, Eliisa & Miettinen, Jenni & Malkamäki, Arttu & Pätäri, Satu & Korhonen, Jaana & Pekkanen, Tiia-Lotta & Tuppura, Anni & Lähtinen, Katja & Autio, Minna & Linn, 2021. "Pathways to a forest-based bioeconomy in 2060 within policy targets on climate change mitigation and biodiversity protection," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    10. Price, James & Keppo, Ilkka, 2017. "Modelling to generate alternatives: A technique to explore uncertainty in energy-environment-economy models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 356-369.
    11. Brent Sohngen & Robert Mendelsohn, 2003. "An Optimal Control Model of Forest Carbon Sequestration," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 85(2), pages 448-457.
    12. Eirik Ogner Jåstad & Torjus Folsland Bolkesjø & Per Kristian Rørstad & Atle Midttun & Judit Sandquist & Erik Trømborg, 2021. "The Future Role of Forest-Based Biofuels: Industrial Impacts in the Nordic Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-24, April.
    13. Liu, Wan-Yu & Chiang, Yi-Hua & Lin, Chun-Cheng, 2022. "Adopting renewable energies to meet the carbon reduction target: Is forest carbon sequestration cheaper?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    14. E. Downey Brill, Jr. & Shoou-Yuh Chang & Lewis D. Hopkins, 1982. "Modeling to Generate Alternatives: The HSJ Approach and an Illustration Using a Problem in Land Use Planning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 221-235, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Monge, Juan J. & Bryant, Henry L. & Gan, Jianbang & Richardson, James W., 2016. "Land use and general equilibrium implications of a forest-based carbon sequestration policy in the United States," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 102-120.
    2. Martínez-Cortés, Oscar Geovani & Kant, Shashi & Isufllari, Henrieta, 2024. "Forest sector models for tropical countries - A case study of Colombia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Aditya Sinha & Aranya Venkatesh & Katherine Jordan & Cameron Wade & Hadi Eshraghi & Anderson R. Queiroz & Paulina Jaramillo & Jeremiah X. Johnson, 2024. "Diverse decarbonization pathways under near cost-optimal futures," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Miguel RIVIERE & Sylvain CAURLA, 2018. "Integrating non-timber objectives into bio-economic models of the forest sector: a review of recent innovations and current shortcomings," Working Papers of BETA 2018-26, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    5. Baker, J.S. & Wade, C.M. & Sohngen, B.L. & Ohrel, S. & Fawcett, A.A., 2019. "Potential complementarity between forest carbon sequestration incentives and biomass energy expansion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 391-401.
    6. Esser, Katharina & Finke, Jonas & Bertsch, Valentin & Löschel, Andreas, 2025. "Participatory modelling to generate alternatives to support decision-makers with near-optimal decarbonisation options," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 395(C).
    7. Michetti, Melania & Parrado, Ramiro, "undated". "Improving land-use modelling within CGE to assess forest-based mitigation potential and costs," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124887, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Favero, Alice & Mendelsohn, Robert & Sohngen, Brent, "undated". "Carbon Storage and Bioenergy: Using Forests for Climate Mitigation," MITP: Mitigation, Innovation and Transformation Pathways 232215, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    9. Daigneault, Adam & Baker, Justin S. & Guo, Jinggang & Lauri, Pekka & Favero, Alice & Forsell, Nicklas & Johnston, Craig & Ohrel, Sara & Sohngen, Brent, 2021. "How the Future of the Global Forest Sink Depends on Timber Demand, Forest Management, and Carbon Prices," CEnREP Working Papers 340059, North Carolina State University, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    10. Ovando, Paola & Caparrós, Alejandro, 2009. "Land use and carbon mitigation in Europe: A survey of the potentials of different alternatives," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 992-1003, March.
    11. Sohngen, Brent & Favero, Alice & Jin, Yufang & Huang, Yuhan, "undated". "Global cost estimates of forest climate mitigation with albedo: A new policy approach," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274307, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Kai Lan & Alice Favero & Yuan Yao & Robert O. Mendelsohn & Hannah Szu-Han Wang, 2025. "Global land and carbon consequences of mass timber products," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Ujjayant Chakravorty & Marie‐Hélène Hubert & Michel Moreaux & Linda Nøstbakken, 2017. "Long‐Run Impact of Biofuels on Food Prices," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 119(3), pages 733-767, July.
    14. Daigneault, Adam J., "undated". "Global forest management and carbon sequestration futures under alternative shared socioeconomic pathways," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274308, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Favero, Alice & Mendelsohn, Robert, 2013. "Evaluating the Global Role of Woody Biomass as a Mitigation Strategy," Climate Change and Sustainable Development 148929, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    16. Lintunen, Jussi & Uusivuori, Jussi, 2014. "On The Economics of Forest Carbon: Renewable and Carbon Neutral But Not Emission Free," Climate Change and Sustainable Development 165755, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    17. Calzadilla, Alvaro & Delzeit, Ruth & Klepper, Gernot, 2014. "DART-BIO: Modelling the interplay of food, feed and fuels in a global CGE model," Kiel Working Papers 1896, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    18. Miguel Riviere & Sylvain Caurla, 2020. "Representations of the Forest Sector in Economic Models [Les représentations du secteur forestier dans les modèles économiques]," Post-Print hal-03088084, HAL.
    19. Acosta, Montserrat & Sohngen, Brent, 2009. "How big is leakage from forestry carbon credits? Estimates from a Global Model," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49468, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Alice Favero & Robert Mendelsohn & Brent Sohngen, 2017. "Using forests for climate mitigation: sequester carbon or produce woody biomass?," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 195-206, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:179:y:2025:i:c:s1389934125001984. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.