IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v395y2025ics0306261925009146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participatory modelling to generate alternatives to support decision-makers with near-optimal decarbonisation options

Author

Listed:
  • Esser, Katharina
  • Finke, Jonas
  • Bertsch, Valentin
  • Löschel, Andreas

Abstract

Institutions of higher education promote and lead sustainability and climate action by example. Their campuses often have significant energy demands and emissions, potential for sector-coupling, and are centrally organised so that real data and key decision-makers can be involved. Energy system models are a key tool for providing guidance in such complex situations, however, we identify three typical shortcomings: (i) model uncertainty, (ii) simplification of real-world dynamics and pure cost-minimisation, and (iii) lack of interaction with decision-makers despite claiming to provide decision support. Concerning (i) and (ii), we developed a highly flexible implementation of modelling to generate alternatives (MGA) to explore diverse, near-cost-optimal decarbonisation paths for the energy supply of a large university campus. Concerning (iii), we apply a participatory approach with stakeholders to define the modelling targets and develop the energy system model. We use Ruhr University Bochum as a case study, representative of a large comprehensive university campus, and base the model on real data for heating, cooling and electricity. We find that the cost-optimum is extremely flat with significant room for choices in heating and cooling technologies only 1 % above the least cost. At 10 % extra cost, there are no must-have heating technologies. Bio-methane or pellet boilers can each provide up to 100 % of the heating demand, while high- and low-temperature air-water heat pumps can provide up to 86 % and 47 %, respectively, and a deep geothermal plant up to 38 %. Due to area availability, electricity supply always relies on 90 % procurement from the grid. Within this room for choices, we highlight alternatives that could be particularly desired due to risk diversification, realisation and maintenance efforts or synergies with research and teaching activities. The implementation of MGA reduces structural and parametric model uncertainty while the participatory modelling approach supports the internal decision-making process. Together with stakeholders, we develop guidelines to transfer our approach of early, holistic and near-optimal planning to other similarly scaled and organised systems such as neighbourhoods, municipalities, large companies and institutions or urban energy systems more generally and lead the energy transition by example.

Suggested Citation

  • Esser, Katharina & Finke, Jonas & Bertsch, Valentin & Löschel, Andreas, 2025. "Participatory modelling to generate alternatives to support decision-makers with near-optimal decarbonisation options," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 395(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:395:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925009146
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261925009146
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.126184?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:395:y:2025:i:c:s0306261925009146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.