IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finlet/v18y2016icp297-301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The systemic importance of banks – name and shame seems to work

Author

Listed:
  • Bańbuła, Piotr
  • Iwanicz-Drozdowska, Małgorzata

Abstract

We test the impact of announcements of the list of global systemically important banks by the Financial Stability Board on the systemic importance of these banks. To this end we estimate the Systemic Importance Index introduced by Zhou (2010) for 110 banks, including global systemically important banks, over the period 1991–2014. For each bank we control for a number of variables, including size, quality of the bank balance sheet and business model that can affect systemic importance. We find that the announcement has decreased the systemic importance of these institutions by about 25%, a substantial and statistically significant amount.

Suggested Citation

  • Bańbuła, Piotr & Iwanicz-Drozdowska, Małgorzata, 2016. "The systemic importance of banks – name and shame seems to work," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 297-301.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:18:y:2016:i:c:p:297-301
    DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2016.05.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612316300794
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.frl.2016.05.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen Zhou, 2010. "Are Banks Too Big to Fail? Measuring Systemic Importance of Financial Institutions," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 6(34), pages 205-250, December.
    2. Moenninghoff, Sebastian C. & Ongena, Steven & Wieandt, Axel, 2015. "The perennial challenge to counter Too-Big-to-Fail in banking: Empirical evidence from the new international regulation dealing with Global Systemically Important Banks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 221-236.
    3. Jacob Kleinow & Tobias Nell & Silvia Rogler & Andreas Horsch, 2014. "The value of being systemically important: event study on regulatory announcements for banks," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(24), pages 1585-1604, December.
    4. Abreu, José Filipe & Gulamhussen, Mohamed Azzim, 2013. "The stock market reaction to the public announcement of a supranational list of too-big-to-fail banks during the financial crisis," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 49-72.
    5. Bongini, Paola & Nieri, Laura & Pelagatti, Matteo, 2015. "The importance of being systemically important financial institutions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 562-574.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Berlinger, Edina, 2017. "Implicit rating: A potential new method to alert crisis on the interbank lending market," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 277-283.
    2. Konstantinos Drakos & Ioannis Malandrakis, 2021. "Global Versus Non-Global Banks: A Capital Ratios-Based Analysis," Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Central bank of Montenegro, vol. 10(2), pages 5-22.
    3. Kleinow, Jacob & Moreira, Fernando & Strobl, Sascha & Vähämaa, Sami, 2017. "Measuring systemic risk: A comparison of alternative market-based approaches," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 40-46.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gündüz, Yalin, 2020. "The market impact of systemic risk capital surcharges," Discussion Papers 09/2020, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    2. Stephen Kawas & Everton Dockery, 2023. "What do we know about the stock markets’ reaction to regulatory announcements regarding financial institutions? Evidence from UK financial institutions," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 31-67, January.
    3. Andrieș, Alin Marius & Nistor, Simona & Ongena, Steven & Sprincean, Nicu, 2020. "On Becoming an O-SII (“Other Systemically Important Institution”)," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    4. Markoulis, Stelios & Martzoukos, Spiridon & Patsalidou, Elena, 2022. "Global systemically important banks regulation: Blessing or curse?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    5. Allen, Kyle D. & Cyree, Ken B. & Whitledge, Matthew D. & Winters, Drew B., 2018. "An event study analysis of too-big-to-fail after the Dodd-Frank act: Who is too big to fail?," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 19-31.
    6. Schnabel, Isabel & Weder di Mauro, Beatrice & Schäfer, Alexander, 2016. "Bail-in Expectations for European Banks: Actions Speak Louder than Words," CEPR Discussion Papers 11061, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Ohsung Kwon & Sung-guan Yun & Seung Hun Han & Yang Hon Chung & Duk Hee Lee, 2018. "Network Topology and Systemically Important Firms in the Interfirm Credit Network," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 51(4), pages 847-864, April.
    8. Moch Nils, 2018. "The Contribution of Large Banking Institutions to Systemic Risk: What Do We Know? A Literature Review," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 69(3), pages 231-257, December.
    9. Egger, Peter H. & Li, Jie & Zhu, Jiaqing, 2023. "The network and own effects of global-systemically-important-bank designations," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    10. Schäfer, Alexander & Schnabel, Isabel & Weder di Mauro, Beatrice, 2016. "Bail-in expectations for European banks: Actions speak louder than words," ESRB Working Paper Series 7, European Systemic Risk Board.
    11. Elayan, Fayez A. & Aktas, Rafet & Brown, Kareen & Pacharn, Parunchana, 2018. "The impact of the Volcker rule on targeted banks, systemic risk, liquidity, and financial reporting quality," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 69-89.
    12. Vogel, Ursula, 2020. "O-SII designation and deposit funding costs," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    13. Bellia, Mario & Heynderickx, Wouter & Maccaferri, Sara & Schich, Sebastian, 2020. "Do CDS markets care about the G-SIB status?," Working Papers 2020-02, Joint Research Centre, European Commission.
    14. Schäfer, Alexander & Schnabel, Isabel & Weder di Mauro, Beatrice, 2016. "Bail-in Expectations for European Banks: Actions Speak Louder than Words," CEPR Discussion Papers 11061, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    15. Lilit Popoyan & Mauro Napoletano & Andrea Roventini, 2023. "Systemically important banks - emerging risk and policy responses: An agent-based investigation," LEM Papers Series 2023/30, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    16. Silva, Walmir & Kimura, Herbert & Sobreiro, Vinicius Amorim, 2017. "An analysis of the literature on systemic financial risk: A survey," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 91-114.
    17. Dewenter, Kathryn L. & Riddick, Leigh A., 2018. "What's the value of a TBTF guaranty? Evidence from the G-SII designation for insurance companies✰," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 70-85.
    18. Degryse, Hans & Mariathasan, Mike & Tang, Thi Hien, 2020. "GSIB status and corporate lending: An international analysis," CEPR Discussion Papers 15564, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    19. Schäfer, Alexander, 2016. "A SIFI Badge for Banks in Europe: Reduction in Bail-Out Expectations or Monumental Heritage Protection?," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145754, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    20. Bongini, Paola & Nieri, Laura & Pelagatti, Matteo & Piccini, Andrea, 2017. "Curbing systemic risk in the insurance sector: A mission impossible?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 256-273.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Systemic importance; G-SIBs;

    JEL classification:

    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finlet:v:18:y:2016:i:c:p:297-301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/frl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.